Paper · 2025 · Environmental and Experimental Botany

Priming and memory in ancient olive cultivars: Enhancing drought resilience through rhizosphere microbial consortia under repeated stress cycles

Emanuele Fosso; Maria Tartaglia; Gina Gizzi; et al.

15
claims
31
verbatim quotes
0
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Understanding how olive cultivars respond to recurrent drought is critical to develop climate-resilient cropping systems. This study investigated the physiological, biochemical, and molecular responses of three autochthonous cultivars (Ortice, Ortolana, Racioppella) exposed to repeated water deficit, with and without inoculation of a PGPR consortium ( Bacillus subtilis , Pseudomonas fluorescens ). Under stress, Ortolana maintained stable water status, Ortice exhibited progressive adaptive plasticity, while Racioppella showed heightened stress sensitivity with limited recovery capacity. Microbial inoculation enhanced the accumulation of osmolytes (proline, soluble sugars) and antioxidants (phenols, flavonoids), and mitigated pigment degradation. At the molecular level, drought induced strong upregulation of NCED1 and repression of PP2C , while inoculated plants displayed a tempered transcriptional response, suggesting effective priming. Upon the second stress exposure, LEA46 and DHN1 expression increased markedly, particularly in Ortice, indicating activation of stress memory. Expression of OePIP2.1 aquaporin declined under drought, consistent with reduced membrane water permeability; however, cultivar-specific patterns emerged, implying differential regulatory strategies. The microbial consortium appeared to reinforce both primed and memory-based responses. These findings demonstrate that integrating tolerant genotypes with functional microbial inoculants enhances drought resilience through coordinated physiological regulation and timely modulation of stress-responsive genes, supporting sustainable olive production in water-limited environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought Ortolana maintained stable water status.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Material
Ortolanae0
Outcome
stable water statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under stress, Ortolana maintained stable water status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–454 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought Ortice showed progressive adaptive plasticity.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Material
Orticee0
Outcome
progressive adaptive plasticitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ortice exhibited progressive adaptive plasticity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–504 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under drought Racioppella showed heightened stress sensitivity with limited recovery.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Material
Racioppellae0
Outcome
heightened stress sensitivity with limited recovery capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Racioppella showed heightened stress sensitivity with limited recovery capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–591 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation enhanced osmolyte accumulation.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
Microbial inoculatione0
Outcome
accumulation of osmolytes (proline, soluble sugars)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial inoculation enhanced the accumulation of osmolytes (proline, soluble sugars)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation enhanced antioxidant accumulation.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
Microbial inoculatione0
Outcome
antioxidants (phenols, flavonoids)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial inoculation enhanced the accumulation of osmolytes (proline, soluble sugars) and antioxidants (phenols, flavonoids)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–718 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Microbial inoculation mitigated pigment degradation.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
Microbial inoculatione0
Outcome
pigment degradatione0
Direction
mitigatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Microbial inoculation enhanced the accumulation of osmolytes (proline, soluble sugars) and antioxidants (phenols, flavonoids), and mitigated pigment degradation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–753 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought upregulated NCED1.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
droughte0
Gene
NCED1e0
Outcome
upregulation of NCED1e0
Direction
upregulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought induced strong upregulation of NCED1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–823 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought repressed PP2C.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
droughte0
Gene
PP2Ce0
Outcome
repression of PP2Ce0
Direction
repressione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought induced strong upregulation of NCED1 and repression of PP2C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–846 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated plants had a tempered transcriptional response.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
inoculatede0
Outcome
transcriptional responsee0
Direction
temperede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculated plants displayed a tempered transcriptional response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second stress exposure increased LEA46 expression, particularly in Ortice.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Material
Orticee0
Treatment
second stress exposuree0
Gene
LEA46e0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upon the second stress exposure, LEA46 and DHN1 expression increased markedly, particularly in Ortice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second stress exposure increased DHN1 expression, particularly in Ortice.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Material
Orticee0
Treatment
second stress exposuree0
Gene
DHN1e0
Outcome
DHN1 expressione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upon the second stress exposure, LEA46 and DHN1 expression increased markedly, particularly in Ortice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1051 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OePIP2.1 aquaporin expression declined under drought.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
droughte0
Gene
OePIP2.1 aquaporine0
Outcome
Expression of OePIP2.1 aquaporine0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Expression of OePIP2.1 aquaporin declined under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

OePIP2.1 expression showed cultivar-specific patterns.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Gene
OePIP2.1 aquaporine1
Outcome
cultivar-specific patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivar-specific patterns emerged”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1246 · show in text ↑
e1

“Expression of OePIP2.1 aquaporin declined under drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1093–1148 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The consortium appeared to reinforce primed and memory-based drought responses.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Treatment
microbial consortiume0
Outcome
primed and memory-based responsese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“microbial consortium appeared to reinforce both primed and memory-based responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1297–1378 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrating tolerant genotypes with microbial inoculants enhanced drought resilience.

Taxon
oliveOlea europaeat0
Material
tolerant genotypese0
Treatment
functional microbial inoculantse0
Outcome
drought resiliencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Olea europaea
Olea europaea · TaxonHans Hillewaert · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“integrating tolerant genotypes with functional microbial inoculants enhances drought resilience”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1507 · show in text ↑
t0

“olive cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–45 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: phytochemicals · Olea europaea (common olive)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · molecular: expression · Olea europaea (common olive)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.