Paper · 2025 · Tropical Plant Pathology

Evaluation of chitosan oligosaccharide as an alternative treatment to mitigate Fusarium graminearum and mycotoxin contamination in wheat

Gabriel Ferreira Paiva; Lara Lorrayne Silvestre de Andrade; José Maria da Silva; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Fusarium head blight (FHB), caused by members of the Fusarium graminearum species complex, is one of the most serious wheat diseases worldwide, capable of causing severe yield losses and affecting grain quality. Methods available for FHB management include cultural practices, sowing of resistant cultivars, chemical control, and biological control. In the present study, we evaluated the effect of chitosan oligosaccharide on the control of fungal growth, seed infection, disease symptoms and mycotoxin contamination under both controlled environments and in the field. In the in vitro conditions, chitosan oligosaccharide directly affected fungal growth at different levels depending on the concentration used. When applied as a seed treatment, both tebuconazole and chitosan oligosaccharide reduced the incidence of F. graminearum and preserved seed germination potential of infected seeds. In the field, there was no significant difference in disease severity and DON in grains between the unsprayed check and the fungicide, regardless of the doses or times of chitosan oligosaccharide application. The results of this study suggest that chitosan oligosaccharide can potentially be used as a tool in the integrated management of the disease, establishing a basis for future studies to explore its use associated with chemical products, aiming to increase the efficacy of FHB control in wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan oligosaccharide affected fungal growth in vitro depending on concentration.

Treatment
chitosan oligosaccharidee0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
fungal growthe0
Qualifier
depending on the concentration usede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the in vitro conditions, chitosan oligosaccharide directly affected fungal growth at different levels depending on the concentration used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 580–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum and mycotoxin contamination in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tebuconazole seed treatment reduced F. graminearum incidence.

Treatment
tebuconazolee0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of F. graminearume0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied as a seed treatment, both tebuconazole and chitosan oligosaccharide reduced the incidence of F. graminearum and preserved seed germination potential of infected seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitosan oligosaccharide seed treatment reduced F. graminearum incidence.

Treatment
chitosan oligosaccharidee0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Outcome
incidence of F. graminearume0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When applied as a seed treatment, both tebuconazole and chitosan oligosaccharide reduced the incidence of F. graminearum and preserved seed germination potential of infected seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both seed treatments preserved germination potential of infected wheat seeds.

Treatment
chitosan oligosaccharidee0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogent0
Outcome
seed germination potentiale0
Direction
preservede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“both tebuconazole and chitosan oligosaccharide reduced the incidence of F. graminearum and preserved seed germination potential of infected seeds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–902 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field disease severity did not differ significantly between unsprayed and fungicide checks across chitosan applications.

Treatment
fungicidee0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
disease severitye0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
unsprayed checke0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field, there was no significant difference in disease severity and DON in grains between the unsprayed check and the fungicide, regardless of the doses or times of chitosan oligosaccharide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum and mycotoxin contamination in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Field grain DON did not differ significantly between unsprayed and fungicide checks across chitosan applications.

Treatment
fungicidee0
Interactor
Fusarium graminearumFusarium graminearumt0pathogen
Outcome
DON in grainse0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
unsprayed checke0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field, there was no significant difference in disease severity and DON in grains between the unsprayed check and the fungicide, regardless of the doses or times of chitosan oligosaccharide application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 903–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fusarium graminearum and mycotoxin contamination in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–136 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggest chitosan oligosaccharide may be useful in integrated wheat disease management.

Treatment
chitosan oligosaccharidee0
Outcome
integrated management of the diseasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chitosan oligosaccharide can potentially be used as a tool in the integrated management of the disease”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1253 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–136 · show in text ↑

tebuconazole · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

chitosan · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fungicide · Fusarium graminearum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.