Paper · 2025 · Agroforestry Systems

Performance of cacao clones resistant to frosty pod rot under agroforestry systems and full sun in the Colombian Amazon

Jose Ivan Vanegas; Juan Carlos Suárez; Fernando Casanoves; et al.

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Cacao production under agroforestry systems (AFS) can increase the incidence of diseases such as Moniliophthora roreri (Cif.) Evans et al., commonly known as Frosty Pod Rot (FPR) of cacao. However, some clones have shown tolerance to this disease, even under AFS conditions. Therefore, this study aims to identify the behavior of different cacao clones planted under full sun and shade conditions with the aiming of identifying clones that combine greater tolerance to the disease with superior yields to 1000 kg ha −1 year −1 under AFS in the Colombian Amazon. The FPR resistance was evaluated in 18 cacao clones under both artificial inoculation and field conditions. Monitoring was conducted for one year in both full sun and shade. Data were analyzed using linear mixed models to determine differences between factors (i.e., clone, ii. condition) and the Disease Productivity Index (DPI). The FEC-2 clone stood out as the most resistant, showing no external or internal symptoms and the lowest pathogen incidence in both production systems (external severity 0.25 ± 0.07, internal severity 0.35 ± 0.06, and incidence of Moniliophthora roreri 0.15 ± 0.02). Other clones, such as ICS-95 and CCN-51, exhibited moderate tolerance, while most clones were classified as susceptible or moderately susceptible. The analysis revealed that shade conditions increased pathogen incidence in most clones, except for FEC-2. Additionally, clones like ICS-95, ICS-39, and FSV-155 reduced their incidence under shade. The Disease and Production Index (DPI) identified FEC-2 as the most promising clone, combining high productivity and tolerance, followed by ICS-95 and CCN-51, which also demonstrated disease tolerance and good yield levels. Clones such as FEAR-5, FSV-41, FLE-3, and ICS-1 were highly susceptible, while EET-8, FSA-12, and FGH-4 were classified as moderately susceptible. These findings highlight the importance of selecting resistant clones like FEC-2 to improve the sustainability and productivity of cacao in Amazonian agroforestry systems, mitigating losses caused by FPR.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone FEC-2 had the lowest Moniliophthora roreri incidence in both production systems, 0.15 ± 0.02.

Material
FEC-2e1
Interactor
Moniliophthora roreriMoniliophthora rorerie0pathogen
Outcome
pathogen incidencee1
Direction
loweste1
Value
0.15 ± 0.02e1
Setting
both production systemse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Moniliophthora roreri
Moniliophthora roreri · InteractorRonnydv10 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The FEC-2 clone stood out as the most resistant, showing no external or internal symptoms and the lowest pathogen incidence in both production systems (external severity 0.25 ± 0.07, internal severity 0.35 ± 0.06, and incidence of Moniliophthora roreri 0.15 ± 0.02)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1167 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cacao production under agroforestry systems (AFS) can increase the incidence of diseases such as Moniliophthora roreri (Cif.) Evans et al., commonly known as Frosty Pod Rot (FPR) of cacao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–196 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone FEC-2 had an external severity of 0.25 ± 0.07 to Moniliophthora roreri.

Material
FEC-2e1
Interactor
Moniliophthora roreriMoniliophthora rorerie0pathogen
Outcome
external severitye1
Value
0.25 ± 0.07e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Moniliophthora roreri
Moniliophthora roreri · InteractorRonnydv10 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The FEC-2 clone stood out as the most resistant, showing no external or internal symptoms and the lowest pathogen incidence in both production systems (external severity 0.25 ± 0.07, internal severity 0.35 ± 0.06, and incidence of Moniliophthora roreri 0.15 ± 0.02)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1167 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cacao production under agroforestry systems (AFS) can increase the incidence of diseases such as Moniliophthora roreri (Cif.) Evans et al., commonly known as Frosty Pod Rot (FPR) of cacao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–196 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone FEC-2 had an internal severity of 0.35 ± 0.06 to Moniliophthora roreri.

Material
FEC-2e1
Interactor
Moniliophthora roreriMoniliophthora rorerie0pathogen
Outcome
internal severitye1
Value
0.35 ± 0.06e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Moniliophthora roreri
Moniliophthora roreri · InteractorRonnydv10 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The FEC-2 clone stood out as the most resistant, showing no external or internal symptoms and the lowest pathogen incidence in both production systems (external severity 0.25 ± 0.07, internal severity 0.35 ± 0.06, and incidence of Moniliophthora roreri 0.15 ± 0.02)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1167 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cacao production under agroforestry systems (AFS) can increase the incidence of diseases such as Moniliophthora roreri (Cif.) Evans et al., commonly known as Frosty Pod Rot (FPR) of cacao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–196 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone FEC-2 showed no external or internal symptoms of frosty pod rot.

Material
FEC-2e1
Interactor
Moniliophthora roreriMoniliophthora rorerie0pathogen
Outcome
external or internal symptomse1
Direction
noe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Moniliophthora roreri
Moniliophthora roreri · InteractorRonnydv10 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The FEC-2 clone stood out as the most resistant, showing no external or internal symptoms and the lowest pathogen incidence in both production systems (external severity 0.25 ± 0.07, internal severity 0.35 ± 0.06, and incidence of Moniliophthora roreri 0.15 ± 0.02)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 902–1167 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cacao production under agroforestry systems (AFS) can increase the incidence of diseases such as Moniliophthora roreri (Cif.) Evans et al., commonly known as Frosty Pod Rot (FPR) of cacao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–196 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clones ICS-95 and CCN-51 showed moderate tolerance to frosty pod rot.

Material
ICS-95 and CCN-51e2
Outcome
tolerancee2
Direction
moderatee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Other clones, such as ICS-95 and CCN-51, exhibited moderate tolerance, while most clones were classified as susceptible or moderately susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1314 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cacao production under agroforestry systems (AFS) can increase the incidence of diseases such as Moniliophthora roreri (Cif.) Evans et al., commonly known as Frosty Pod Rot (FPR) of cacao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–196 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most cacao clones were classified as susceptible or moderately susceptible to frosty pod rot.

Outcome
classified as susceptible or moderately susceptiblee2
Qualifier
most clonese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Other clones, such as ICS-95 and CCN-51, exhibited moderate tolerance, while most clones were classified as susceptible or moderately susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1314 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cacao production under agroforestry systems (AFS) can increase the incidence of diseases such as Moniliophthora roreri (Cif.) Evans et al., commonly known as Frosty Pod Rot (FPR) of cacao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–196 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shade conditions increased pathogen incidence in most cacao clones, except FEC-2.

Treatment
shade conditionse3
Outcome
pathogen incidencee3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
most clones, except for FEC-2e3
Comparator
full sunt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The analysis revealed that shade conditions increased pathogen incidence in most clones, except for FEC-2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1421 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cacao production under agroforestry systems (AFS) can increase the incidence of diseases such as Moniliophthora roreri (Cif.) Evans et al., commonly known as Frosty Pod Rot (FPR) of cacao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–196 · show in text ↑
t0

“agroforestry systems and full sun”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clones ICS-95, ICS-39 and FSV-155 reduced their frosty pod rot incidence under shade compared with full sun.

Material
ICS-95, ICS-39, and FSV-155e4
Treatment
shadee4
Outcome
incidencee4
Direction
reducede4
Comparator
full sunt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Additionally, clones like ICS-95, ICS-39, and FSV-155 reduced their incidence under shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1512 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cacao production under agroforestry systems (AFS) can increase the incidence of diseases such as Moniliophthora roreri (Cif.) Evans et al., commonly known as Frosty Pod Rot (FPR) of cacao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–196 · show in text ↑
t0

“agroforestry systems and full sun”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clone FEC-2 was identified as the most promising clone, combining high productivity and tolerance.

Material
FEC-2e5
Outcome
productivity and tolerancee5
Direction
most promisinge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The Disease and Production Index (DPI) identified FEC-2 as the most promising clone, combining high productivity and tolerance, followed by ICS-95 and CCN-51, which also demonstrated disease tolerance and good yield levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1736 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cacao production under agroforestry systems (AFS) can increase the incidence of diseases such as Moniliophthora roreri (Cif.) Evans et al., commonly known as Frosty Pod Rot (FPR) of cacao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–196 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clones ICS-95 and CCN-51 also demonstrated disease tolerance and good yield levels.

Material
ICS-95 and CCN-51e5
Outcome
disease tolerance and good yield levelse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The Disease and Production Index (DPI) identified FEC-2 as the most promising clone, combining high productivity and tolerance, followed by ICS-95 and CCN-51, which also demonstrated disease tolerance and good yield levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1514–1736 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cacao production under agroforestry systems (AFS) can increase the incidence of diseases such as Moniliophthora roreri (Cif.) Evans et al., commonly known as Frosty Pod Rot (FPR) of cacao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–196 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clones FEAR-5, FSV-41, FLE-3 and ICS-1 were highly susceptible to frosty pod rot.

Material
FEAR-5, FSV-41, FLE-3, and ICS-1e6
Outcome
highly susceptiblee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Clones such as FEAR-5, FSV-41, FLE-3, and ICS-1 were highly susceptible, while EET-8, FSA-12, and FGH-4 were classified as moderately susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1738–1883 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cacao production under agroforestry systems (AFS) can increase the incidence of diseases such as Moniliophthora roreri (Cif.) Evans et al., commonly known as Frosty Pod Rot (FPR) of cacao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–196 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clones EET-8, FSA-12 and FGH-4 were moderately susceptible to frosty pod rot.

Material
EET-8, FSA-12, and FGH-4e6
Outcome
moderately susceptiblee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Clones such as FEAR-5, FSV-41, FLE-3, and ICS-1 were highly susceptible, while EET-8, FSA-12, and FGH-4 were classified as moderately susceptible”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1738–1883 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cacao production under agroforestry systems (AFS) can increase the incidence of diseases such as Moniliophthora roreri (Cif.) Evans et al., commonly known as Frosty Pod Rot (FPR) of cacao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–196 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Selecting resistant clones such as FEC-2 is recommended to improve the sustainability and productivity of cacao.

Material
FEC-2e7
Outcome
sustainability and productivity of cacaoe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“These findings highlight the importance of selecting resistant clones like FEC-2 to improve the sustainability and productivity of cacao in Amazonian agroforestry systems, mitigating losses caused by FPR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1885–2088 · show in text ↑

shade · disease · Theobroma cacao (cocoa)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.