Paper · 2021 · International Letters of Natural Sciences

Micro-Climate Conditions, Weed Diversity, Flowering and Yield of Young Cacao Plants as Affected by Shade Regimes

Idowu Babadele Famuwagun; Samuel O. Agele

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Experiments were conducted in 2015/2018 in two cacao plots established in 2012 and 2013 in Akure, Nigeria to investigate micro-climate conditions, weed densities, flowering and yield of cacao as affected by shade regimes. Established cacao plots under three plantain ( Musa spp ) shade regimes consisting of No-shade, Moderate and Dense shade were used. Air and soil temperature, relative humidity and Photosynthetic Active Radiation (PAR), weed population and species diversity, cacao flowering and pod production were measured. From the results, air and soil temperature measurements under No-shade plots had a significantly higher mean values (32°C) and soil (28°C) compared with moderately shaded [air, 30°C and soil, 26.5°C] and densely shaded [air, 30°C and soil, 26°C] plots in2015 and 2016 measurements but under 2017 measurements, no significant difference in the soil temperature of the plots under dense shade, moderate and the no-shade which were ascribed to canopy close-up of the cacao that led to reduced transmitted light through the canopy to the understories species. The vigour of weeds under no-shade plots were significantly higher compared with dense and moderately shaded plots. In 2013 established cacao plot, flower production was higher significantly in no-shade compared with those in moderate and dense shaded cacao plots in 2015 and 2016 measurement. Pod production under No-shade were significantly higher compared with other treatments in 2016 and 2017. Cherelle wilt rate was higher in shaded plots compared with the no-shade plots. Pod yield parameters were significantly higher under No-shade plots compared with shaded treatments during the three years of data measurement. Air temperature between 30°C to 33.7°C during flowering and fruit/pod setting was found to have positive influence on bean yield in cacao. The study concluded that excessive shade decreases yield of cocoa, while increases in temperature and relative humidity boosts some physiological processes for pod production in Cocoa

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air and soil temperature under no-shade cacao plots were significantly higher than under moderately shaded plots in 2015 and 2016.

Treatment
No-shadee1
Outcome
air and soil temperaturee1
Direction
significantly highere1
Value
32°Ce1
Comparator
moderately shadede1
Setting
Akure, Nigeriae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments were conducted in 2015/2018 in two cacao plots established in 2012 and 2013 in Akure, Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“air and soil temperature measurements under No-shade plots had a significantly higher mean values (32°C) and soil (28°C) compared with moderately shaded [air, 30°C and soil, 26.5°C] and densely shaded [air, 30°C and soil, 26°C] plots in2015 and 2016 measurements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2017 soil temperature did not differ significantly between dense shade, moderate shade and no-shade plots.

Treatment
dense shadee1
Outcome
soil temperaturee1
Direction
no significant differencee1
Comparator
the no-shadee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments were conducted in 2015/2018 in two cacao plots established in 2012 and 2013 in Akure, Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“under 2017 measurements, no significant difference in the soil temperature of the plots under dense shade, moderate and the no-shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–947 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed vigour was significantly higher under no-shade cacao plots than under dense and moderately shaded plots.

Treatment
No-shadee1
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
vigour of weedse1
Direction
significantly highere1
Comparator
dense and moderately shaded plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments were conducted in 2015/2018 in two cacao plots established in 2012 and 2013 in Akure, Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“The vigour of weeds under no-shade plots were significantly higher compared with dense and moderately shaded plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower production was significantly higher in no-shade cacao plots than in moderate and dense shade in 2015 and 2016.

Treatment
no-shadee1
Outcome
flower productione1
Direction
higher significantlye1
Comparator
moderate and dense shaded cacao plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments were conducted in 2015/2018 in two cacao plots established in 2012 and 2013 in Akure, Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“In 2013 established cacao plot, flower production was higher significantly in no-shade compared with those in moderate and dense shaded cacao plots in 2015 and 2016 measurement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1378 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod production under no-shade was significantly higher than under the other treatments in 2016 and 2017.

Treatment
No-shadee1
Outcome
Pod productione1
Direction
significantly highere1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments were conducted in 2015/2018 in two cacao plots established in 2012 and 2013 in Akure, Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pod production under No-shade were significantly higher compared with other treatments in 2016 and 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cherelle wilt rate was higher in shaded cacao plots than in no-shade plots.

Treatment
shaded plotse1
Outcome
Cherelle wilt ratee1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
the no-shade plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments were conducted in 2015/2018 in two cacao plots established in 2012 and 2013 in Akure, Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cherelle wilt rate was higher in shaded plots compared with the no-shade plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1485–1563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pod yield parameters were significantly higher under no-shade than under shaded treatments over three years.

Treatment
No-shadee1
Outcome
Pod yield parameterse1
Direction
significantly highere1
Comparator
shaded treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Experiments were conducted in 2015/2018 in two cacao plots established in 2012 and 2013 in Akure, Nigeria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–105 · show in text ↑
e1

“Pod yield parameters were significantly higher under No-shade plots compared with shaded treatments during the three years of data measurement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1565–1707 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Air temperature between 30°C and 33.7°C during flowering and pod setting had a positive influence on cacao bean yield.

Treatment
Air temperature between 30°C to 33.7°Ce1
Outcome
bean yielde1
Direction
positive influencee1
Value
30°C to 33.7°Ce1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Air temperature between 30°C to 33.7°C during flowering and fruit/pod setting was found to have positive influence on bean yield in cacao”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1846 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excessive shade decreases cocoa yield.

Treatment
excessive shadee1
Outcome
yield of cocoae1
Direction
decreasese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The study concluded that excessive shade decreases yield of cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–1913 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increases in temperature and relative humidity boost some physiological processes for pod production in cacao.

Treatment
increases in temperature and relative humiditye1
Outcome
pod productione1
Qualifier
boosts some physiological processese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Theobroma cacao
Theobroma cacao · TaxonLuisovalles · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“while increases in temperature and relative humidity boosts some physiological processes for pod production in Cocoa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1915–2031 · show in text ↑

shade · yield · Theobroma cacao (cocoa)Results differ

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

shade · disease · Theobroma cacao (cocoa)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

shade · soil: physics · Theobroma cacao (cocoa)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.