Paper · 2005 · DergiPark (Istanbul University)

Research on Determination of Best Grafting Method and Best Graftage Time for Raising Grafted Young Walnut Trees During Summer Period in Tokat City Center

CELEP, Can

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study, the purpose was the to determine best graft method and best graft time for grafted young walnut trees during summer period in Tokat city center. Walnut seeds were planted to field in november, 2002. At the vegetation period of year 2003, young walnuts trees, ready to graftage between july and september were grafted. Using Patch budding, Cleft grafting, T budding and Whip grafting methods. The best grafttage method was obtained by using Patch budding (%72,08). Beside Patch budding, T budding was also found succesful (%64,87). Because of unmature of shoots and budding, the success of Cleft graftting was (%48,50) and Whip grafting was %39,87. It s found that, the best time for late summer grafts was between June 20 and 30, and between August 1 and 10. It is concluded that, irrigation, one week before the graftage, made graftage easear. Avarege temperature 20,6 ºC in July and 21,9 ºC in August affected the ratio of bud-take direckly. The best result of proteching grafted young walnut trees from cold was obtained using izocam procetion method (%63,78). Highest survival ratio was found using Patch budding method (%84,78). Lowest survival ratio was cacluded for , Cleft graftting (% 33,5).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Patch budding achieved 72.08% grafting success and was the best method.

Taxon
walnut treest0
Treatment
Patch buddinge0
Outcome
best grafttage methode0
Direction
beste0
Value
%72,08e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“walnut trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 99–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best grafttage method was obtained by using Patch budding (%72,08).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T budding achieved 64.87% success.

Taxon
walnut treest0
Treatment
T buddinge0
Outcome
succesfule0
Value
%64,87e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“walnut trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 99–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“T budding was also found succesful (%64,87).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleft grafting achieved 48.50% success.

Taxon
walnut treest0
Treatment
Cleft grafttinge0
Outcome
successe0
Value
%48,50e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“walnut trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 99–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“the success of Cleft graftting was (%48,50)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Whip grafting achieved 39.87% success.

Taxon
walnut treest0
Treatment
Whip graftinge0
Outcome
Whip graftinge0
Value
%39,87e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

t0

“walnut trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 99–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Whip grafting was %39,87”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–661 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best late summer grafting windows were June 20–30 and August 1–10.

Taxon
walnut treest0
Outcome
best time for late summer graftse0
Value
between June 20 and 30, and between August 1 and 10e0

Verbatim

t0

“walnut trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 99–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“the best time for late summer grafts was between June 20 and 30, and between August 1 and 10.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation one week before grafting made grafting easier.

Taxon
walnut treest0
Treatment
irrigation, one week before the graftagee0
Outcome
graftage easeare0
Direction
easeare0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“walnut trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 99–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“irrigation, one week before the graftage, made graftage easear.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 796–859 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average July and August temperatures directly affected bud take.

Taxon
walnut treest0
Outcome
ratio of bud-takee0
Qualifier
Avarege temperature 20,6 ºC in July and 21,9 ºC in Auguste0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Verbatim

t0

“walnut trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 99–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Avarege temperature 20,6 ºC in July and 21,9 ºC in August affected the ratio of bud-take direckly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Izocam protection produced the best cold protection result at 63.78%.

Taxon
walnut treest0
Treatment
izocam procetion methode0
Outcome
proteching grafted young walnut trees from colde0
Direction
beste0
Value
%63,78e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“walnut trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 99–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“The best result of proteching grafted young walnut trees from cold was obtained using izocam procetion method (%63,78).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Patch budding yielded the highest survival at 84.78%.

Taxon
walnut treest0
Treatment
Patch budding methode0
Outcome
survival ratioe0
Direction
Higheste0
Value
%84,78e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“walnut trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 99–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Highest survival ratio was found using Patch budding method (%84,78).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cleft grafting yielded the lowest survival at 33.5%.

Taxon
walnut treest0
Treatment
Cleft grafttinge0
Outcome
survival ratioe0
Direction
Loweste0
Value
% 33,5e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“walnut trees”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 99–111 · show in text ↑
e0

“Lowest survival ratio was cacluded for , Cleft graftting (% 33,5).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1149–1215 · show in text ↑

grafting · survival · Juglans (walnuts)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.