Paper · 2009 · Shaanxi Forest Science and Technology

Experiment on Factors Affecting the Survival Rate of Walnut with High Grafting and Head Change

Wei Fan

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The experiments on different grafting date and different grafting methods were carried out.The meteorological factors 20 days after grafting were analyzed.The results indicated that the best grafting date for walnut falls between April l0 and May 1;the length of cutting surface of scion is 10~15 cm which shows a higher survival rate.Tongue grafting with film lashing to keep moisture and emperature gained a higher survivall rate,44% over the traditional soil packed to keep moisture and temperature.High temperature and sunny days after grafting are helpful to improve the survival rate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The best walnut grafting window is April l0 to May 1.

Taxon
walnute0
Outcome
best grafting datee0
Value
between April l0 and May 1e0

Verbatim

e0

“The results indicated that the best grafting date for walnut falls between April l0 and May 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 155–248 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scion cutting surfaces 10~15 cm long had higher survival.

Taxon
walnutt0
Treatment
10~15 cme0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
10~15 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the length of cutting surface of scion is 10~15 cm which shows a higher survival rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 249–335 · show in text ↑
t0

“Walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tongue grafting with film lashing raised survival 44% above soil packing.

Taxon
walnutt0
Treatment
Tongue grafting with film lashinge0
Outcome
survivall ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
44%e0
Comparator
traditional soil packede0

Verbatim

e0

“Tongue grafting with film lashing to keep moisture and emperature gained a higher survivall rate,44% over the traditional soil packed to keep moisture and temperature.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–502 · show in text ↑
t0

“Walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High temperature after grafting improved walnut survival.

Taxon
walnutt0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
improvee0
Setting
High temperaturee0

Verbatim

e0

“High temperature and sunny days after grafting are helpful to improve the survival rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sunny days after grafting improved walnut survival.

Taxon
walnutt0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
improvee0
Setting
sunny dayse0

Verbatim

e0

“High temperature and sunny days after grafting are helpful to improve the survival rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Walnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑

grafting · survival · Juglans (walnuts)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.