Paper · 2025 · Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture

Bacillus altitudinis and Bacillus cereus strains improve soil fertility, nutrient acquisition, biomass production, and yield of wheat grown on calcareous soil

Muhammad Zahid Mumtaz; Rahila Aslam; Lingling Li; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Mineral-dissolving rhizobacteria are considered ecological friendly rhizonutrifying agents capable of promoting rhizospheric enzymatic activities, microbial biomass, and nutrient availability even under nutrient-deficient alkaline soil conditions. However, comprehensive studies on their effectiveness in calcareous soil are lacking. The current study hypothesized that beneficial rhizobacteria improve soil biochemical properties in calcareous soil through their impact on enzymatic activities, microbial biomass, and nutrient availability in the rhizosphere. Methods Rhizobacterial strains were isolated from wheat rhizosphere and characterized in vitro for their mineral solubilization potential, production of beneficial metabolites, and various enzymatic activities. A pot experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of sole and co-inoculation treatments on wheat growth, grain attributes, nutrient availability in soil and absorption in plants, soil enzymatic activities, and microbial biomass accumulation in wheat rhizosphere under calcareous soil conditions. Results The most effective mineral-dissolving rhizobacteria were identified as Bacillus altitudinis (strains SAM1, SAM7, SAM13, and SAM15) and Bacillus cereus (strain SAM9) through 16S rRNA partial gene sequencing. These strains demonstrated the dissolution of insoluble tricalcium phosphate, mica, zinc oxide, and manganese oxide, and promoted nutrient availability in the soil by producing organic acids. Inoculation enhanced wheat growth and grain development by promoting nutrient acquisition and stimulating rhizospheric microbial activity. Both sole and co-inoculation with rhizobacterial strains significantly increased soil enzymatic activities, microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, and nutrient availability in the wheat rhizosphere through organic matter decomposition. Among treatments, sole inoculation with B . cereus SAM9 and co-inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 + B. altitudinis SAM13 demonstrated the most dominant increase in wheat growth and grain attributes, nutrient availability in soil and absorption in plants, deposition of microbial biomass, and soil enzymatic activities. Conclusions The sole inoculation with B . cereus SAM9 and co-inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 + B. altitudinis SAM13 showed strong potential as bioinoculants for calcareous soils. These strains could be effectively integrated into commercial biofertilizer formulation as sustainable alternatives or supplements to chemical fertilizers, enhancing soil productivity and crop performance. Graphical Abstract

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacillus altitudinis strains and Bacillus cereus SAM9 were identified as the most effective mineral-dissolving rhizobacteria by 16S rRNA partial gene sequencing.

Interactor
Bacillus altitudinisBacillus altitudinise1symbiont
Second interactor
Bacillus cereusBacillus cereuse1symbiont
Outcome
mineral-dissolving rhizobacteriae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · Second interactorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grown on calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“The most effective mineral-dissolving rhizobacteria were identified as Bacillus altitudinis (strains SAM1, SAM7, SAM13, and SAM15) and Bacillus cereus (strain SAM9) through 16S rRNA partial gene sequencing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1308 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rhizobacterial strains dissolved insoluble tricalcium phosphate, mica, zinc oxide and manganese oxide in vitro.

Outcome
dissolution of insoluble tricalcium phosphate, mica, zinc oxide, and manganese oxidee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grown on calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–158 · show in text ↑
e2

“These strains demonstrated the dissolution of insoluble tricalcium phosphate, mica, zinc oxide, and manganese oxide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1425 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The rhizobacterial strains promoted soil nutrient availability by producing organic acids.

Compound
organic acidse3
Outcome
nutrient availability in the soile3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grown on calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–158 · show in text ↑
e3

“promoted nutrient availability in the soil by producing organic acids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1500 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with rhizobacteria enhanced wheat growth and grain development.

Treatment
Inoculatione4
Outcome
wheat growth and grain developmente4
Direction
enhancede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grown on calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–158 · show in text ↑
e4

“Inoculation enhanced wheat growth and grain development by promoting nutrient acquisition and stimulating rhizospheric microbial activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1639 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole and co-inoculation with rhizobacterial strains significantly increased soil enzymatic activities in the wheat rhizosphere.

Organ / stage
wheat rhizospheree5
Treatment
sole and co-inoculation with rhizobacterial strainse5
Interactor
rhizobacterial strainse5symbiont
Outcome
soil enzymatic activitiese5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grown on calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–158 · show in text ↑
e5

“Both sole and co-inoculation with rhizobacterial strains significantly increased soil enzymatic activities, microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, and nutrient availability in the wheat rhizosphere through organic matter decomposition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole and co-inoculation with rhizobacterial strains significantly increased microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus.

Organ / stage
wheat rhizospheree5
Treatment
sole and co-inoculation with rhizobacterial strainse5
Interactor
rhizobacterial strainse5symbiont
Outcome
microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and phosphoruse5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grown on calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–158 · show in text ↑
e5

“Both sole and co-inoculation with rhizobacterial strains significantly increased soil enzymatic activities, microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, and nutrient availability in the wheat rhizosphere through organic matter decomposition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole and co-inoculation with rhizobacterial strains significantly increased nutrient availability in the wheat rhizosphere.

Organ / stage
wheat rhizospheree5
Treatment
sole and co-inoculation with rhizobacterial strainse5
Interactor
rhizobacterial strainse5symbiont
Outcome
nutrient availability in the wheat rhizospheree5
Direction
increasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grown on calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–158 · show in text ↑
e5

“Both sole and co-inoculation with rhizobacterial strains significantly increased soil enzymatic activities, microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, and nutrient availability in the wheat rhizosphere through organic matter decomposition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1641–1888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 and co-inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 + B. altitudinis SAM13 gave the most dominant increase in wheat growth and grain attributes.

Treatment
sole inoculation with B . cereus SAM9 and co-inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 + B. altitudinis SAM13e7
Interactor
B. cereus SAM9Bacillus cereuse7symbiont
Second interactor
B. altitudinis SAM13Bacillus altitudinise7symbiont
Outcome
wheat growth and grain attributese7
Direction
most dominant increasee7
Comparator
Among treatmentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grown on calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–158 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among treatments, sole inoculation with B . cereus SAM9 and co-inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 + B. altitudinis SAM13 demonstrated the most dominant increase in wheat growth and grain attributes, nutrient availability in soil and absorption in plants, deposition of microbial biomass, and soil enzymatic activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1890–2204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole and co-inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 gave the most dominant increase in nutrient availability in soil and absorption in plants.

Treatment
sole inoculation with B . cereus SAM9 and co-inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 + B. altitudinis SAM13e7
Interactor
B. cereus SAM9Bacillus cereuse7symbiont
Second interactor
B. altitudinis SAM13Bacillus altitudinise7symbiont
Outcome
nutrient availability in soil and absorption in plantse7
Direction
most dominant increasee7
Comparator
Among treatmentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grown on calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–158 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among treatments, sole inoculation with B . cereus SAM9 and co-inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 + B. altitudinis SAM13 demonstrated the most dominant increase in wheat growth and grain attributes, nutrient availability in soil and absorption in plants, deposition of microbial biomass, and soil enzymatic activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1890–2204 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole and co-inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 gave the most dominant increase in microbial biomass deposition and soil enzymatic activities.

Treatment
sole inoculation with B . cereus SAM9 and co-inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 + B. altitudinis SAM13e7
Interactor
B. cereus SAM9Bacillus cereuse7symbiont
Second interactor
B. altitudinis SAM13Bacillus altitudinise7symbiont
Outcome
deposition of microbial biomass, and soil enzymatic activitiese7
Direction
most dominant increasee7
Comparator
Among treatmentse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bacillus cereus
Bacillus cereus · InteractorMogana Das Murtey and Patchamuthu Ramasamy · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grown on calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–158 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among treatments, sole inoculation with B . cereus SAM9 and co-inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 + B. altitudinis SAM13 demonstrated the most dominant increase in wheat growth and grain attributes, nutrient availability in soil and absorption in plants, deposition of microbial biomass, and soil enzymatic activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1890–2204 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sole inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 and co-inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 + B. altitudinis SAM13 show strong potential as bioinoculants for calcareous soils.

Outcome
strong potential as bioinoculants for calcareous soilse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grown on calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–158 · show in text ↑
e7

“The sole inoculation with B . cereus SAM9 and co-inoculation with B. cereus SAM9 + B. altitudinis SAM13 showed strong potential as bioinoculants for calcareous soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2218–2383 · show in text ↑
Recommendationhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The strains could be integrated into commercial biofertilizer formulations as alternatives or supplements to chemical fertilizers.

Outcome
commercial biofertilizer formulatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat grown on calcareous soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–158 · show in text ↑
e7

“These strains could be effectively integrated into commercial biofertilizer formulation as sustainable alternatives or supplements to chemical fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2385–2539 · show in text ↑

Bacillus cereus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Bacillus cereus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 58 positive, 7 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

inoculation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

532 papers: 476 positive, 56 negative or no effect

475 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

528 papers more in this group

See all 532 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.