Paper · 2025 · Journal of Plant Ecology

Clipping-induced compensatory growth response of Leymus chinensis clones mediated by nitrogen availability under heterogeneous environments

Naeem Ullah Khalil; Wan-Yue Zhu; Xin-Ying Dou; et al.

15
claims
29
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Plants’ compensatory growth is the common response following grazing/mowing, particularly determined by the damage severity, availability of resources and plant functional types. Clonal plants exhibit unique clonal functional traits, yet the compensatory growth strategies underlying their responses to clipping intensity under various nitrogen (N) availability levels remain poorly understood. In this study, a pot experiment was conducted to test how the clonal plant species Leymus chinensis responds to clipping and N enrichment under heterogeneous soil conditions. Moderate clipping significantly enhanced the total biomass of younger ramets by 22% and 12%, under high and low N conditions, respectively, but had no impact on the total biomass of older ramets. The results suggested that L. chinensis exhibited over-compensatory growth characterized by prioritized biomass allocation to younger ramets rather than to older ramets, which facilitated its spatial expansion. However, severe clipping reduced the total biomass of younger ramets by 23%. Furthermore, the older ramets reduced biomass allocation to belowground parts and decreased the rhizome length (−28%), which negatively affected the growth of younger ramets. The younger ramets exhibited adaptation to clipping through the enhancement of antioxidant enzyme activities and the elevation of osmotic regulatory substance concentrations. N enrichment did not influence the total biomass of younger ramets or the entire clone. However, under moderate clipping, the biomass of older ramets increased relative to conditions without N enrichment. Our findings indicate that N availability affected the compensatory growth of the L. chinensis clone induced by clipping, thereby promoting the spatial expansion of this species. These results hold significant potential utilization of clonal plants for the restoration of patchy degraded grasslands.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate clipping increased younger ramet biomass by 22% under high nitrogen.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
Moderate clippinge0
Outcome
total biomass of younger rametse0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
22%e0
Qualifier
highe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate clipping significantly enhanced the total biomass of younger ramets by 22% and 12%, under high and low N conditions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate clipping increased younger ramet biomass by 12% under low nitrogen.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
Moderate clippinge0
Outcome
total biomass of younger rametse0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
12%e0
Qualifier
low N conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate clipping significantly enhanced the total biomass of younger ramets by 22% and 12%, under high and low N conditions, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate clipping did not affect older ramet biomass.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
Moderate clippinge1
Outcome
total biomass of older rametse0
Direction
no impacte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“but had no impact on the total biomass of older ramets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–773 · show in text ↑
e1

“Moderate clipping significantly enhanced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. chinensis showed over-compensatory growth with biomass prioritized to younger ramets.

Taxon
L. chinensisLeymus chinensise0
Organ / stage
younger rametse0
Outcome
over-compensatory growthe0

Verbatim

e0

“L. chinensis exhibited over-compensatory growth characterized by prioritized biomass allocation to younger ramets rather than to older ramets, which facilitated its spatial expansion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–984 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prioritized biomass allocation to younger ramets facilitated spatial expansion.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Outcome
spatial expansione0
Qualifier
prioritized biomass allocation to younger ramets rather than to older rametse0

Verbatim

e0

“prioritized biomass allocation to younger ramets rather than to older ramets, which facilitated its spatial expansion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 867–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe clipping reduced younger ramet biomass by 23%.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
severe clippinge0
Outcome
total biomass of younger rametse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
23%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“severe clipping reduced the total biomass of younger ramets by 23%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Older ramets reduced biomass allocation belowground.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Organ / stage
older rametse0
Outcome
biomass allocation to belowground partse0
Direction
reducede0

Verbatim

e0

“the older ramets reduced biomass allocation to belowground parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Older ramet rhizome length decreased by 28%.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Organ / stage
older rametse0
Outcome
rhizome lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
−28%e0

Verbatim

e0

“the older ramets reduced biomass allocation to belowground parts and decreased the rhizome length (−28%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1180 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced belowground allocation and rhizome length of older ramets negatively affected younger ramet growth.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Outcome
growth of younger rametse0
Direction
negatively affectede0
Qualifier
reduced biomass allocation to belowground parts and decreased the rhizome lengthe0

Verbatim

e0

“the older ramets reduced biomass allocation to belowground parts and decreased the rhizome length (−28%), which negatively affected the growth of younger ramets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1236 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Younger ramets enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities in adaptation to clipping.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
clippinge0
Outcome
antioxidant enzyme activitiese0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The younger ramets exhibited adaptation to clipping through the enhancement of antioxidant enzyme activities and the elevation of osmotic regulatory substance concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1411 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Younger ramets elevated osmotic regulatory substance concentrations in adaptation to clipping.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
clippinge0
Outcome
osmotic regulatory substance concentrationse0
Direction
elevatione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The younger ramets exhibited adaptation to clipping through the enhancement of antioxidant enzyme activities and the elevation of osmotic regulatory substance concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1238–1411 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen enrichment did not influence younger ramet biomass.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
N enrichmente0
Outcome
total biomass of younger rametse0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“N enrichment did not influence the total biomass of younger ramets or the entire clone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen enrichment did not influence entire clone biomass.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
N enrichmente0
Outcome
total biomass of younger ramets or the entire clonee0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“N enrichment did not influence the total biomass of younger ramets or the entire clone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1499 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under moderate clipping, nitrogen enrichment increased older ramet biomass.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
N enrichmente0
Outcome
biomass of older rametse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
under moderate clippinge0
Comparator
conditions without N enrichmente0

Verbatim

e0

“under moderate clipping, the biomass of older ramets increased relative to conditions without N enrichment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1616 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–65 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen availability affected clipping-induced compensatory growth and promoted spatial expansion.

Taxon
L. chinensisLeymus chinensise0
Outcome
spatial expansion of this speciese0
Qualifier
N availability affected the compensatory growthe0

Verbatim

e0

“N availability affected the compensatory growth of the L. chinensis clone induced by clipping, thereby promoting the spatial expansion of this species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1645–1795 · show in text ↑

mechanical · growth · Leymus chinensisPositive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.