Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Environmental Science

Soil saline-alkali heterogeneity is an important factor driving the spatial expansion of clonal plant in grassland

Luhao Qu; Jun Liu; Jiyun Yang; et al.

17
claims
32
verbatim quotes
9
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil salinity is well known heterogeneous and various within natural soil environment. In Songnen grassland of Northeast China, grazing aggravates the saline-alkali heterogeneity in soil habitat, which led to dominant clonal plant species forming a variety of adaptive strategies. However, based on the previous studies of morphological plasticity and clonal integration in clonal plants, there was a lack of mechanism research on the spatial expansion strategy of clonal plants population subjected to clipping in saline-alkali heterogeneity soil patches. To address this knowledge gap, we carried out an experiment by applying different clipping intensities (0%, 35%, 70% of the above-ground biomass removed) to explore the spatial expansion strategy and morphological plasticity of Leymus chinensis and their belowground rhizomes in different heterogeneous saline-alkali patches. We found that, clipping significantly decreased the plant average height and above-ground biomass in homogeneous patches, especially heavy clipping had a significant adverse impact on plant belowground (rhizome, fine root) biomass and leaf area. However, there was no significant difference in the biomass, average height, and leaf area among the clipping treatments in low saline-alkali heterogeneous patches. In addition, the number of leaves, daughter plants and rhizome internode buds were significantly affected by saline-alkali heterogeneity alone, and low saline-alkali heterogeneity had a positive effect on these parameters. Biomass accumulation and rhizome expansion were gradually inhibited by the increasing of clipping intensity in a homogeneous environment, but the inhibitory effect of clipping was not significant in saline-alkali patches soil. We concluded that L. chinensis can respond to grazing or mowing disturbance by increasing tiller and daughter-plant numbers in a saline-alkali heterogeneous environment. The saline-alkali patches promoted clonal plant population spatial expansion more than grazing or mowing disturbance did. This study emphasizes saline-alkali heterogeneity distribution patterns in grassland soil environment were the primary and important driving factor promoting the spatial expansion of L. chinensis .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping decreased mean plant height in homogeneous patches.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
clippinge0
Outcome
plant average heighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“clipping significantly decreased the plant average height and above-ground biomass in homogeneous patches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping decreased aboveground biomass in homogeneous patches.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
clippinge0
Outcome
above-ground biomasse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“clipping significantly decreased the plant average height and above-ground biomass in homogeneous patches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 898–1003 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy clipping adversely affected rhizome biomass.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
heavy clippinge0
Outcome
rhizomee0
Direction
adversee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“especially heavy clipping had a significant adverse impact on plant belowground (rhizome, fine root) biomass and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy clipping adversely affected fine-root biomass.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
heavy clippinge0
Outcome
fine roote0
Direction
adversee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“especially heavy clipping had a significant adverse impact on plant belowground (rhizome, fine root) biomass and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heavy clipping adversely affected leaf area.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
heavy clippinge0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
adversee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“especially heavy clipping had a significant adverse impact on plant belowground (rhizome, fine root) biomass and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1127 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping treatments did not differ significantly in biomass in low saline–alkali heterogeneous patches.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
clipping treatmentse0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference in the biomass, average height, and leaf area among the clipping treatments in low saline-alkali heterogeneous patches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping treatments did not differ significantly in mean height in low saline–alkali heterogeneous patches.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
clipping treatmentse0
Outcome
average heighte0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference in the biomass, average height, and leaf area among the clipping treatments in low saline-alkali heterogeneous patches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clipping treatments did not differ significantly in leaf area in low saline–alkali heterogeneous patches.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
clipping treatmentse0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference in the biomass, average height, and leaf area among the clipping treatments in low saline-alkali heterogeneous patches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low saline–alkali heterogeneity positively affected leaf number.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
low saline-alkali heterogeneitye0
Outcome
number of leavese0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the number of leaves, daughter plants and rhizome internode buds were significantly affected by saline-alkali heterogeneity alone, and low saline-alkali heterogeneity had a positive effect on these parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low saline–alkali heterogeneity positively affected daughter-plant number.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
low saline-alkali heterogeneitye0
Outcome
daughter plantse0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the number of leaves, daughter plants and rhizome internode buds were significantly affected by saline-alkali heterogeneity alone, and low saline-alkali heterogeneity had a positive effect on these parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Low saline–alkali heterogeneity positively affected rhizome internode bud number.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
low saline-alkali heterogeneitye0
Outcome
rhizome internode budse0
Direction
positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the number of leaves, daughter plants and rhizome internode buds were significantly affected by saline-alkali heterogeneity alone, and low saline-alkali heterogeneity had a positive effect on these parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing clipping intensity inhibited biomass accumulation in homogeneous soil.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
increasing of clipping intensitye0
Outcome
Biomass accumulatione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass accumulation and rhizome expansion were gradually inhibited by the increasing of clipping intensity in a homogeneous environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing clipping intensity inhibited rhizome expansion in homogeneous soil.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
increasing of clipping intensitye0
Outcome
rhizome expansione0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Biomass accumulation and rhizome expansion were gradually inhibited by the increasing of clipping intensity in a homogeneous environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1517–1653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The inhibitory effect of clipping was nonsignificant in saline–alkali patches.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Outcome
inhibitory effect of clippinge0

Verbatim

e0

“the inhibitory effect of clipping was not significant in saline-alkali patches soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leymus chinensis responded to disturbance by increasing tiller numbers in heterogeneous soil.

Taxon
L. chinensisLeymus chinensise0
Treatment
grazing or mowing disturbancee0
Outcome
tillere0
Direction
increasinge0

Verbatim

e0

“L. chinensis can respond to grazing or mowing disturbance by increasing tiller and daughter-plant numbers in a saline-alkali heterogeneous environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1912 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leymus chinensis responded to disturbance by increasing daughter-plant numbers in heterogeneous soil.

Taxon
L. chinensisLeymus chinensise0
Treatment
grazing or mowing disturbancee0
Outcome
daughter-plant numberse0
Direction
increasinge0

Verbatim

e0

“L. chinensis can respond to grazing or mowing disturbance by increasing tiller and daughter-plant numbers in a saline-alkali heterogeneous environment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1762–1912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Saline–alkali patches promoted clonal spatial expansion more than disturbance did.

Taxon
Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensist0
Treatment
saline-alkali patchese0
Outcome
clonal plant population spatial expansione0
Direction
promotede0
Comparator
grazing or mowing disturbancee0

Verbatim

e0

“The saline-alkali patches promoted clonal plant population spatial expansion more than grazing or mowing disturbance did.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1914–2035 · show in text ↑
t0

“Leymus chinensis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–801 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Leymus chinensisResults differ

26 papers: 9 positive, 17 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

mechanical · growth · Leymus chinensisPositive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.