Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of wider spacing, nutrient levels and bio stimulant on growth and yield of rice (Oryza sativa L.) under transplanted field conditions

GK Warik; VV Sagvekar; TN Thorat; et al.

9
claims
17
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2024 at the Agronomy Farm, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Karjat, Raigad (M.S.) to assess the effects of spacing, nutrient levels, and bio-stimulant application on growth, yield, and quality of transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.). The study was arranged in a split-plot design with 18 treatment combinations replicated thrice, comprising three spacings (20 cm × 15 cm, 25 cm × 15 cm, and 30 cm × 15 cm), two nutrient levels (100% and 75% RDF), and three bio-stimulant treatments (control, irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm, and @ 100 ppm). Results indicated that wider spacing (30 cm × 15 cm) significantly enhanced growth parameters, yield attributes, grain yield, and nutrient uptake. Application of 100% RDF improved growth and yield over 75% RDF, while foliar application of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm proved superior to control and 100 ppm for growth, yield, and physiological traits. Economic analysis revealed that 30 cm × 15 cm spacing with 75% RDF and irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm yielded the highest net returns and benefit-cost ratio. The study suggests that applying 75% RDF with four foliar sprays of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm is a cost-effective strategy for maximizing yield and profitability in kharif rice under Konkan conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider 30 cm × 15 cm spacing significantly enhanced growth parameters and yield attributes.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
wider spacing (30 cm × 15 cm)e0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield attributese0
Direction
enhancede0
Setting
transplanted field conditionst0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wider spacing (30 cm × 15 cm) significantly enhanced growth parameters, yield attributes, grain yield, and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.) under transplanted field conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider 30 cm × 15 cm spacing significantly enhanced grain yield.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
wider spacing (30 cm × 15 cm)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wider spacing (30 cm × 15 cm) significantly enhanced growth parameters, yield attributes, grain yield, and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider 30 cm × 15 cm spacing significantly enhanced nutrient uptake.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
wider spacing (30 cm × 15 cm)e0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wider spacing (30 cm × 15 cm) significantly enhanced growth parameters, yield attributes, grain yield, and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–736 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100% RDF improved rice growth and yield over 75% RDF.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
100% RDFe0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
75% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 100% RDF improved growth and yield over 75% RDF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated chitosan at 50 ppm outperformed control and 100 ppm for growth and yield.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
foliar application of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppme0
Outcome
growth, yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control and 100 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm proved superior to control and 100 ppm for growth, yield, and physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irradiated chitosan at 50 ppm outperformed control and 100 ppm for physiological traits.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
foliar application of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppme0
Outcome
physiological traitse0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control and 100 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm proved superior to control and 100 ppm for growth, yield, and physiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 30 cm × 15 cm spacing, 75% RDF and 50 ppm chitosan combination yielded the highest net returns.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
30 cm × 15 cm spacing with 75% RDF and irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppme0
Outcome
net returnse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“30 cm × 15 cm spacing with 75% RDF and irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm yielded the highest net returns and benefit-cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same combination had the highest benefit-cost ratio.

Taxon
rice (Oryza sativa L.)Oryza sativat0
Treatment
30 cm × 15 cm spacing with 75% RDF and irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppme0
Outcome
benefit-cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“30 cm × 15 cm spacing with 75% RDF and irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm yielded the highest net returns and benefit-cost ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–104 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest 75% RDF plus four 50 ppm chitosan foliar sprays for profitable kharif rice in Konkan.

Outcome
applying 75% RDF with four foliar sprays of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppme0
Setting
Konkane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“applying 75% RDF with four foliar sprays of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm is a cost-effective strategy for maximizing yield and profitability in kharif rice under Konkan conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1302 · show in text ↑

chitosan · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

radiation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

43 papers: 27 positive, 16 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

density · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

density · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

395 papers: 330 positive, 65 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

391 papers more in this group

See all 395 papers →

application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

691 papers: 645 positive, 46 negative or no effect

644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

687 papers more in this group

See all 691 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.