Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2024 at the Agronomy Farm, Regional Agricultural Research Station, Karjat, Raigad (M.S.) to assess the effects of spacing, nutrient levels, and bio-stimulant application on growth, yield, and quality of transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.). The study was arranged in a split-plot design with 18 treatment combinations replicated thrice, comprising three spacings (20 cm × 15 cm, 25 cm × 15 cm, and 30 cm × 15 cm), two nutrient levels (100% and 75% RDF), and three bio-stimulant treatments (control, irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm, and @ 100 ppm). Results indicated that wider spacing (30 cm × 15 cm) significantly enhanced growth parameters, yield attributes, grain yield, and nutrient uptake. Application of 100% RDF improved growth and yield over 75% RDF, while foliar application of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm proved superior to control and 100 ppm for growth, yield, and physiological traits. Economic analysis revealed that 30 cm × 15 cm spacing with 75% RDF and irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm yielded the highest net returns and benefit-cost ratio. The study suggests that applying 75% RDF with four foliar sprays of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm is a cost-effective strategy for maximizing yield and profitability in kharif rice under Konkan conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Wider 30 cm × 15 cm spacing significantly enhanced growth parameters and yield attributes.
- Taxon
- rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- wider spacing (30 cm × 15 cm)e0
- Outcome
- growth parameters, yield attributese0
- Direction
- enhancede0
- Setting
- transplanted field conditionst0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wider spacing (30 cm × 15 cm) significantly enhanced growth parameters, yield attributes, grain yield, and nutrient uptake”
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.) under transplanted field conditions”
Claim · model-written summary
Wider 30 cm × 15 cm spacing significantly enhanced grain yield.
- Taxon
- rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- wider spacing (30 cm × 15 cm)e0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wider spacing (30 cm × 15 cm) significantly enhanced growth parameters, yield attributes, grain yield, and nutrient uptake”
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Wider 30 cm × 15 cm spacing significantly enhanced nutrient uptake.
- Taxon
- rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- wider spacing (30 cm × 15 cm)e0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptakee0
- Direction
- enhancede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“wider spacing (30 cm × 15 cm) significantly enhanced growth parameters, yield attributes, grain yield, and nutrient uptake”
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
100% RDF improved rice growth and yield over 75% RDF.
- Taxon
- rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 100% RDFe0
- Outcome
- growth and yielde0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- 75% RDFe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 100% RDF improved growth and yield over 75% RDF”
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irradiated chitosan at 50 ppm outperformed control and 100 ppm for growth and yield.
- Taxon
- rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- foliar application of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppme0
- Outcome
- growth, yielde0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- control and 100 ppme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar application of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm proved superior to control and 100 ppm for growth, yield, and physiological traits”
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Irradiated chitosan at 50 ppm outperformed control and 100 ppm for physiological traits.
- Taxon
- rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- foliar application of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppme0
- Outcome
- physiological traitse0
- Direction
- superiore0
- Comparator
- control and 100 ppme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“foliar application of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm proved superior to control and 100 ppm for growth, yield, and physiological traits”
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 30 cm × 15 cm spacing, 75% RDF and 50 ppm chitosan combination yielded the highest net returns.
- Taxon
- rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 30 cm × 15 cm spacing with 75% RDF and irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppme0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“30 cm × 15 cm spacing with 75% RDF and irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm yielded the highest net returns and benefit-cost ratio”
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The same combination had the highest benefit-cost ratio.
- Taxon
- rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Oryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 30 cm × 15 cm spacing with 75% RDF and irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppme0
- Outcome
- benefit-cost ratioe0
- Direction
- higheste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“30 cm × 15 cm spacing with 75% RDF and irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm yielded the highest net returns and benefit-cost ratio”
t0“rice (Oryza sativa L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest 75% RDF plus four 50 ppm chitosan foliar sprays for profitable kharif rice in Konkan.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0
- Outcome
- applying 75% RDF with four foliar sprays of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppme0
- Setting
- Konkane0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“applying 75% RDF with four foliar sprays of irradiated chitosan @ 50 ppm is a cost-effective strategy for maximizing yield and profitability in kharif rice under Konkan conditions”
The same questions in other papers
chitosan · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →radiation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
39 papers more in this group
See all 43 papers →density · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →density · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
391 papers more in this group
See all 395 papers →application · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
644 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
687 papers more in this group
See all 691 papers →fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.