Paper · 2025 · Research on Crops

Melatonin enriched chitosan coating prolonged shelf life and preserved postharvest qualities of ambiently stored banana

DEBASHIS MANDAL; C. LALRINSANGI; NOEL LALHRUAITLUANGI; et al.

12
claims
32
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Banana, the cheapest energy boosting fruit, is globally consumed for its abundance in carbohydrates, fibre, minerals, particularly potassium, vitamins and phenolic compounds. Bananas are most frequently stored and traded in ambient conditions in many tropical developing countries. However, this leads to high perishability with low shelf life. Therefore, in the present experiment, Melatonin, a natural substance found to delay ripening and fruit senescence, has been used along with Chitosan, a biodegradable biopolymer, found to maintain postharvest quality, inhibit microbial growth and extend shelf life; in sole and in combination for evaluating response on quality and storability of banana cv. Vaibalhla (Tall Cavendish; AAA) at ambient condition (Temperature: 26±30C; Relative Humidity: 75±6%) in the Postharvest Research Laboratory, Department of Horticulture, Aromatic and Medicinal Plants, Mizoram University, Aizawl-796004, India during April-May, 2022. The nine postharvest treatments, viz., T1: Melatonin (MLT) 200 µM, T2: MLT 500 µM, T3: Chitosan (CH) 1%, T4: CH 1.5%, T5: MLT 200 µM + CH 1%, T6: MLT 500 µM + CH 1%, T7: MLT 200 µM + CH 1.5%, T8: MLT 500 µM + CH 1.5% and T9: Control (water dipped) were used in the present study with five replications following a complete randomised design. Results manifested that the MLT+CH combined application in mature green banana had maintained better fruit quality and shelf life during storage. Fruits treated with MLT 200 µM + CH 1% (T5) had minimum weight loss (9.87%), high fruit firmness (21.45/Ncm2), excellent skin colour (L: 87.67, a: 12.16, b: 62.97) with delayed accumulation of TSS (11.150Brix), total sugar (11.76%) and gradual breakdown of starch (2.12%) due to slow down ripening of fruits up to 12 days after storage (DAS). This combined treatment had retained high ascorbic acid (16.96 mg/100 g), phenolics (0.49 mg GAE/g), antioxidant activity (41.36% inhibition DPPH), with minimum fruit decay (8.33%) and thus recorded maximum shelf life (17.20 days) against the control (10.60 days). Therefore, MLT 200 µM + CH 1% was proved to be a favourable approach for long preserving physicochemical qualities while extending shelf life under ambient storage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined melatonin and chitosan maintained better banana fruit quality and shelf life.

Taxon
bananae0
Treatment
MLT+CH combined applicatione0
Outcome
fruit quality and shelf lifee0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the MLT+CH combined application in mature green banana had maintained better fruit quality and shelf life during storage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1333–1453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined coating minimized weight loss at 9.87%.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
MLT 200 µM + CH 1%e0
Outcome
weight losse0
Direction
minimume0
Value
9.87%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Fruits treated with MLT 200 µM + CH 1% (T5) had minimum weight loss (9.87%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined coating maintained fruit firmness at 21.45/Ncm2.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
MLT 200 µM + CH 1%e1
Outcome
fruit firmnesse0
Direction
highe0
Value
21.45/Ncm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“high fruit firmness (21.45/Ncm2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1564 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits treated with MLT 200 µM + CH 1% (T5) had minimum weight loss (9.87%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined coating yielded skin colour L 87.67.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
skin coloure0
Value
87.67e0

Verbatim

e0

“excellent skin colour (L: 87.67, a: 12.16, b: 62.97)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1566–1618 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined coating delayed TSS accumulation to 11.150Brix.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
MLT 200 µM + CH 1%e1
Outcome
TSSe0
Direction
delayede0
Value
11.150Brixe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“delayed accumulation of TSS (11.150Brix)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1624–1664 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits treated with MLT 200 µM + CH 1% (T5) had minimum weight loss (9.87%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined coating delayed total sugar accumulation to 11.76%.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
MLT 200 µM + CH 1%e1
Outcome
total sugare0
Value
11.76%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“total sugar (11.76%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1686 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits treated with MLT 200 µM + CH 1% (T5) had minimum weight loss (9.87%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined coating gave gradual starch breakdown to 2.12%.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
MLT 200 µM + CH 1%e1
Outcome
breakdown of starche0
Direction
gradual breakdowne0
Value
2.12%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“gradual breakdown of starch (2.12%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1691–1726 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits treated with MLT 200 µM + CH 1% (T5) had minimum weight loss (9.87%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coating retained high ascorbic acid at 16.96 mg/100 g.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
MLT 200 µM + CH 1%e1
Outcome
ascorbic acide0
Direction
highe0
Value
16.96 mg/100 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“retained high ascorbic acid (16.96 mg/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–1870 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits treated with MLT 200 µM + CH 1% (T5) had minimum weight loss (9.87%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coating retained phenolics at 0.49 mg GAE/g.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
MLT 200 µM + CH 1%e1
Outcome
phenolicse0
Value
0.49 mg GAE/ge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“phenolics (0.49 mg GAE/g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1872–1897 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits treated with MLT 200 µM + CH 1% (T5) had minimum weight loss (9.87%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coating retained antioxidant activity at 41.36% inhibition DPPH.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
MLT 200 µM + CH 1%e1
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Value
41.36% inhibition DPPHe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“antioxidant activity (41.36% inhibition DPPH)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–1944 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits treated with MLT 200 µM + CH 1% (T5) had minimum weight loss (9.87%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coating minimized fruit decay at 8.33%.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
MLT 200 µM + CH 1%e1
Outcome
fruit decaye0
Direction
minimume0
Value
8.33%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“minimum fruit decay (8.33%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–1978 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits treated with MLT 200 µM + CH 1% (T5) had minimum weight loss (9.87%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The coating extended shelf life to 17.20 days versus 10.60 days for control.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
MLT 200 µM + CH 1%e1
Outcome
shelf lifee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
17.20 dayse0
Qualifier
10.60 dayse0
Comparator
controle0

Verbatim

e0

“maximum shelf life (17.20 days) against the control (10.60 days)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1997–2061 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits treated with MLT 200 µM + CH 1% (T5) had minimum weight loss (9.87%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1530 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–119 · show in text ↑

chitosan · quality: postharvest · MusaResults differ

20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

melatonin · quality: phytochemicals · MusaPositive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

chitosan · quality: phytochemicals · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

melatonin · quality: sugar starch · MusaResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

melatonin · disease · MusaResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

chitosan · disease · MusaResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

melatonin · quality: postharvest · MusaResults agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

chitosan · quality: sugar starch · MusaResults agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.