Paper · 2025 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Morpho‐physiological and agronomic responses of wheat varieties under artificial shade in agroforestry systems

Anna Panozzo; Pranay Kumar Bolla; Giuseppe Barion; et al.

13
claims
28
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Solar radiation is a primary constraint in silvoarable agroforestry, with yield losses near the trees well documented in temperate climates. However, genetic variability for shade tolerance remains largely unexplored. This 2-year field trial investigated the impact of artificial shading - using nets that reduced photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) by moderate (-30%) and severe (-50%) levels relative to full sun - on the morpho-physiology and yield of common wheat. During the first growing season, three varieties were evaluated: the modern variety, Bologna, and two old, tall varieties, Piave and Terminillo. In the second season, only Bologna was retested under the same shading treatments, to further assess its performance. RESULTS: Shading treatments delayed crop phenology from heading onward. They were associated with a prolonged canopy stay-green, with effects accentuated by increasing shading severity. In the first year, moderate shading increased Bologna's grain yield by 8% (P ≤ 0.05) and raised protein content by 0.7%. In the second year, drier conditions and reduced radiation from March-June - causing more severe limitation of PAR, the amount of sunlight available for photosynthesis - led to a 40% yield loss. Old varieties suffered yield reductions due to lodging (-43% in Terminillo, -66% in Piave), yet showed notable increases in mineral content (up to +48% Mg in Piave) and grain protein (+1.7% in Terminillo and +3.4% in Piave). Under shaded conditions, increased gliadin content led to enhanced gluten accumulation, potentially improving dough extensibility. CONCLUSIONS: Although nets can mimic shading in wheat effectively, these results highlight the need to extend varietal screening to identify suitable genotypes and key morpho-physiological traits to optimize wheat cultivation in shaded environments such as agroforestry systems, with further validation in specific emerging models. © 2025 The Author(s). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society of Chemical Industry.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading treatments delayed wheat crop phenology from heading onward.

Treatment
Shading treatmentse0
Outcome
crop phenologye0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat varieties under artificial shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Shading treatments delayed crop phenology from heading onward”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–820 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shading was associated with a prolonged canopy stay-green in wheat, with effects accentuated by increasing shading severity.

Treatment
increasing shading severitye0
Outcome
canopy stay-greene0
Direction
prolongede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat varieties under artificial shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“They were associated with a prolonged canopy stay-green, with effects accentuated by increasing shading severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first year, moderate shading increased grain yield of Bologna wheat by 8% (P <= 0.05).

Material
Bolognae0
Treatment
moderate shadinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8%e0
Qualifier
In the first yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat varieties under artificial shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the first year, moderate shading increased Bologna's grain yield by 8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first year, moderate shading raised grain protein content of Bologna wheat by 0.7%.

Treatment
moderate shadinge0
Outcome
protein contente1
Direction
raisede1
Value
0.7%e1
Qualifier
In the first yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat varieties under artificial shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the first year, moderate shading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–971 · show in text ↑
e1

“raised protein content by 0.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1055 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the second year, drier conditions and reduced radiation led to a 40% yield loss.

Treatment
drier conditions and reduced radiatione0
Outcome
yield losse1
Direction
losse1
Value
40%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat varieties under artificial shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the second year, drier conditions and reduced radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1115 · show in text ↑
e1

“led to a 40% yield loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1250 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Old variety Terminillo suffered a 43% yield reduction due to lodging under shading.

Material
Terminilloe0
Treatment
artificial shadet0
Outcome
yield reductionse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
-43%e0
Qualifier
due to lodginge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat varieties under artificial shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Old varieties suffered yield reductions due to lodging (-43% in Terminillo, -66% in Piave)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Old variety Piave suffered a 66% yield reduction due to lodging under shading.

Material
Piavee0
Treatment
artificial shadet0
Outcome
yield reductionse0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
-66%e0
Qualifier
due to lodginge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat varieties under artificial shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Old varieties suffered yield reductions due to lodging (-43% in Terminillo, -66% in Piave)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1342 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under shading, the old variety Piave showed a notable increase in mineral content (up to +48% Mg).

Material
Piavee0
Treatment
artificial shadet0
Outcome
mineral contente0
Direction
increasese0
Value
up to +48% Mge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat varieties under artificial shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“yet showed notable increases in mineral content (up to +48% Mg in Piave) and grain protein (+1.7% in Terminillo and +3.4% in Piave)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under shading, the old variety Terminillo showed a notable increase in grain protein (+1.7%).

Material
Terminilloe0
Treatment
artificial shadet0
Outcome
grain proteine0
Direction
increasese0
Value
+1.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat varieties under artificial shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“yet showed notable increases in mineral content (up to +48% Mg in Piave) and grain protein (+1.7% in Terminillo and +3.4% in Piave)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under shading, the old variety Piave showed a notable increase in grain protein (+3.4%).

Material
Piavee0
Treatment
artificial shadet0
Outcome
grain proteine0
Direction
increasese0
Value
+3.4%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat varieties under artificial shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“yet showed notable increases in mineral content (up to +48% Mg in Piave) and grain protein (+1.7% in Terminillo and +3.4% in Piave)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under shaded conditions, gliadin content increased in wheat.

Treatment
shaded conditionse0
Outcome
gliadin contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat varieties under artificial shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under shaded conditions, increased gliadin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1477–1527 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased gliadin content under shading led to enhanced gluten accumulation, potentially improving dough extensibility.

Gene
gliadine0
Outcome
enhanced gluten accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat varieties under artificial shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“increased gliadin content led to enhanced gluten accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1502–1563 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors highlight the need to extend varietal screening to identify suitable genotypes for shaded wheat cultivation.

Outcome
extend varietal screeninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat varieties under artificial shade”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“these results highlight the need to extend varietal screening to identify suitable genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1675–1767 · show in text ↑

shade · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

shade · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

shade · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 9 positive, 60 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.