Paper · 2025 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Symbiotic nitrogen fixation for sustainable chickpea yield and prospects for genome editing in changing climatic situations

Rohit Kumar Mahto; Chandana B. S.; Rajesh Kumar Singh; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) is a vital/essential legume crop valued for its nutritional, agricultural, and economic importance, with a relatively large genome size of approximately 738 megabases. Chickpea roots establish symbiotic relationships with soil microorganisms, resulting in the formation of root nodules essential for biological nitrogen fixation. In this study, 20 chickpea genotypes were selected from a genome-wide association panel to assess nodulation traits under eight different treatment combinations involving biofertilizers ( Rhizobium , vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhiza - VAM) and inorganic fertilizers (NPK) using a randomized block design with three replications. Pre-planting soil preparation included the application of fertilizers and biofertilizers. Comprehensive analyses including descriptive statistics, correlation, path analysis, principal component analysis, agglomerative hierarchical clustering, and gene expression studies were conducted. Among treatments, the NPK+ Rhizobium combination significantly enhanced nodulation across genotypes, while the Rhizobium +VAM (T7) treatment identified ICC-9085 as a superior donor for the number of nodules, aiming for sustainable chickpea productivity. Gene expression profiling through qRT-PCR revealed that the RZ+VAM treatment notably upregulated several key genes, including CaNFP, GST, Leghemoglobin, Nodulin6, and CaLYK3, with CaNFP emerging as a pivotal regulator of nodulation. The marked upregulation of CaNFP underlines its potential as a target for enhancing symbiotic efficiency. The availability of the chickpea draft genome opens new avenues for employing genome editing tools such as CRISPR/Cas systems. Targeted editing of the CaNFP gene offers a promising strategy to improve nodule formation, nitrogen fixation, and overall plant vigor. Integrating CaNFP gene through genome editing with potential genotypes and use of microbial treatments can accelerate the development of elite chickpea cultivars, enhancing productivity while reducing reliance on chemical fertilizers and supporting sustainable agricultural practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus Rhizobium significantly enhanced nodulation across chickpea genotypes.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
NPK+ Rhizobium combinatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the NPK+ Rhizobium combination significantly enhanced nodulation across genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under Rhizobium plus VAM, ICC-9085 was a superior donor for nodule number.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Material
ICC-9085e0
Treatment
Rhizobium +VAM (T7) treatmente0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
VAMe0symbiont
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the Rhizobium +VAM (T7) treatment identified ICC-9085 as a superior donor for the number of nodules”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RZ plus VAM upregulated CaNFP, GST and Leghemoglobin.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RZ+VAM treatmente0
Gene
CaNFPe0
Outcome
CaNFP, GST, Leghemoglobine0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the RZ+VAM treatment notably upregulated several key genes, including CaNFP, GST, Leghemoglobin, Nodulin6, and CaLYK3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RZ plus VAM upregulated Nodulin6 and CaLYK3.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
RZ+VAM treatmente0
Gene
Nodulin6e0
Outcome
Nodulin6, and CaLYK3e0
Direction
upregulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the RZ+VAM treatment notably upregulated several key genes, including CaNFP, GST, Leghemoglobin, Nodulin6, and CaLYK3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–52 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CaNFP was identified as a pivotal regulator of nodulation.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Gene
CaNFPe0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Qualifier
pivotal regulatore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CaNFP emerging as a pivotal regulator of nodulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1411–1463 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–52 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

CaNFP was proposed as a genome editing target to improve nodule formation, fixation and vigor.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Gene
CaNFPe0
Outcome
improve nodule formation, nitrogen fixation, and overall plant vigore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Targeted editing of the CaNFP gene offers a promising strategy to improve nodule formation, nitrogen fixation, and overall plant vigor.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1697–1832 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–52 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 51 positive, 1 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

48 papers: 43 positive, 5 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

mycorrhiza · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.