Paper · 2025 · Plants

Optimizing Common Bean Symbiosis via Stage-Specific Reinoculation and Co-Inoculation

Tamires Ester Peixoto Bravo; Itamar Rosa Teixeira; Gisele Carneiro da Silva Teixeira; et al.

2
claims
6
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The common bean relies on biological nitrogen fixation to meet part of its nitrogen requirements. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of reinoculation with Rhizobium tropici, alone or combined with Azospirillum brasilense, at different phenological stages. The experiments were conducted in the winter of 2023 and the rainy season of 2023/24, and significant differences were observed between seasons, mainly due to temperature and water stress, which impacted nodulation, plant growth and grain yield. However, appropriate water management mitigated these limitations, allowing reinoculation combined with co-inoculation at the V4 stage to improve nodular and morphophysiological traits, ensuring adequate nutrition through biological nitrogen fixation. This strategy promoted nodulation and plant development, resulting in an 8.5% increase in yield compared to nitrogen fertilization (80 kg ha−1), reaching 2197.87 kg ha−1. These results suggest that reinoculation with co-inoculation at the V4 stage can enhance biological nitrogen fixation, reduce dependence on synthetic fertilizers and serve as a sustainable and economically viable alternative.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reinoculation combined with co-inoculation at the V4 stage improved nodular and morphophysiological traits of common bean.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
reinoculation combined with co-inoculation at the V4 stagee2
Interactor
Rhizobium tropiciMartinezella tropicie0symbiont
Second interactor
Azospirillum brasilenseAzospirillum brasilensee0symbiont
Outcome
nodular and morphophysiological traitse2
Direction
improvee2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Martinezella tropici
Martinezella tropici · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum brasilense
Azospirillum brasilense · Second interactorCristiane Colodel · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This study aimed to evaluate the effect of reinoculation with Rhizobium tropici, alone or combined with Azospirillum brasilense, at different phenological stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 98–259 · show in text ↑
e1

“The common bean relies on biological nitrogen fixation to meet part of its nitrogen requirements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e2

“allowing reinoculation combined with co-inoculation at the V4 stage to improve nodular and morphophysiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–691 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation at the V4 stage resulted in an 8.5% increase in yield compared with nitrogen fertilization.

Taxon
common beanPhaseolus vulgarise1
Treatment
reinoculation combined with co-inoculation at the V4 stagee2
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasee3
Value
8.5%e3
Comparator
nitrogen fertilizatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phaseolus vulgaris
Phaseolus vulgaris · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The common bean relies on biological nitrogen fixation to meet part of its nitrogen requirements”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–96 · show in text ↑
e2

“allowing reinoculation combined with co-inoculation at the V4 stage to improve nodular and morphophysiological traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–691 · show in text ↑
e3

“resulting in an 8.5% increase in yield compared to nitrogen fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–889 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Martinezella tropici · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

191 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.