Paper · 2025 · Scientia Horticulturae

Metabolomic and transcriptomic analyses of VOCs functions in different ripening periods tomato resistance responses to Botrytis cinerea infection

Hongdou Gao; Chengxin Wu; Zhen Jia; et al.

8
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The species and quantity of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and the disease resistance are different in red and green ripening periods of tomato. In this study, treatments against Botrytis cinerea infections occurred during the red (R B. ) and green (G B. ) ripening periods were investigated. G B. decreased disease incidence rate and enhanced the defense capacity by altering the key defense-related enzymes [NADPH-cytochrome c reductase (NCR), aminopyrine-n-demethylase (AND), aniline-4-hydroxylase (AH) and erythromycin N-demethylase (ERND)] activities. Gray mold development in tomatoes is associated with defense mechanisms and cell degradation. PUFAs are involved in maintaining cell integrity. PUFA-related enzymes, such as lipoxygenase (LOX) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), showed lower activity levels during G B. . Additionally, G B. enhanced the energy level by increasing NAD + , NADH, and ATP amounts. At the metabolic level, the VOCs composition was altered by the G B. , leading to a reduction in key precursors of PUFA synthesis, including aldehydes/alcohols (VAAs). Among them, the concentrations of key disease resistance-associated substances - hexanal, 2-hexanal, and citral - significantly declined during the G B. . Transcriptomic analysis revealed that G B. modulated gene expression changes corresponded to metabolomic changes, with 37 PUFAs-related genes down-regulated and 79 up-regulated compared to R B. . These findings indicate that G B. enhances disease-resistance capability and maintains cellular integrity. Thereby, fewer genes and VOCs need to be mobilized to increase resistance in postharvest tomatoes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment against Botrytis cinerea during green ripening (G B.) decreased disease incidence rate in tomato

Treatment
treatments against Botrytis cinerea infectionse1
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereae1pathogen
Outcome
disease incidence ratee2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato resistance responses to Botrytis cinerea infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatments against Botrytis cinerea infections occurred during the red (R B. ) and green (G B. ) ripening periods were investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 163–294 · show in text ↑
e2

“G B. decreased disease incidence rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green-ripening treatment (G B.) enhanced the defense capacity of tomato

Treatment
G B.e2
Outcome
defense capacitye3
Direction
enhancede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato resistance responses to Botrytis cinerea infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–145 · show in text ↑
e2

“G B. decreased disease incidence rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–333 · show in text ↑
e3

“enhanced the defense capacity by altering the key defense-related enzymes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 338–411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green-ripening treatment (G B.) lowered the activity levels of lipoxygenase (LOX) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) in tomato

Treatment
G B.e1
Gene
lipoxygenase (LOX) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH)e1
Outcome
activity levelse1
Direction
lowere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato resistance responses to Botrytis cinerea infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“PUFA-related enzymes, such as lipoxygenase (LOX) and alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), showed lower activity levels during G B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–826 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green-ripening treatment (G B.) increased NAD+, NADH and ATP amounts in tomato

Treatment
G B.e2
Outcome
NAD + , NADH, and ATP amountse1
Direction
increasinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato resistance responses to Botrytis cinerea infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“enhanced the energy level by increasing NAD + , NADH, and ATP amounts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–917 · show in text ↑
e2

“G B. decreased disease incidence rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–333 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green-ripening treatment (G B.) reduced key precursors of PUFA synthesis, including aldehydes/alcohols (VAAs), in tomato

Treatment
G B.e2
Outcome
key precursors of PUFA synthesis, including aldehydes/alcohols (VAAs)e3
Direction
reductione3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato resistance responses to Botrytis cinerea infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–145 · show in text ↑
e2

“G B. decreased disease incidence rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 296–333 · show in text ↑
e3

“leading to a reduction in key precursors of PUFA synthesis, including aldehydes/alcohols (VAAs)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 990–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green-ripening treatment (G B.) significantly reduced hexanal, 2-hexanal and citral concentrations in tomato

Treatment
G B.e1
Outcome
the concentrations of key disease resistance-associated substances - hexanal, 2-hexanal, and citrale1
Direction
declinede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato resistance responses to Botrytis cinerea infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“the concentrations of key disease resistance-associated substances - hexanal, 2-hexanal, and citral - significantly declined during the G B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green-ripening treatment (G B.) downregulated 37 PUFA-related genes in tomato compared with red-ripening treatment (R B.)

Treatment
G B.e1
Outcome
PUFAs-related genese1
Direction
down-regulatede1
Value
37e1
Comparator
R B.e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato resistance responses to Botrytis cinerea infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“G B. modulated gene expression changes corresponded to metabolomic changes, with 37 PUFAs-related genes down-regulated and 79 up-regulated compared to R B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Green-ripening treatment (G B.) upregulated 79 PUFA-related genes in tomato compared with red-ripening treatment (R B.)

Treatment
G B.e1
Outcome
PUFAs-related genese1
Direction
up-regulatede1
Value
79e1
Comparator
R B.e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato resistance responses to Botrytis cinerea infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–145 · show in text ↑
e1

“G B. modulated gene expression changes corresponded to metabolomic changes, with 37 PUFAs-related genes down-regulated and 79 up-regulated compared to R B.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1435 · show in text ↑

Botrytis cinerea · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

infection · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 29 positive, 27 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.