Paper · 2025 · ScienceAsia

Chitin-based biostimulant improves productivity and antioxidant activities of 'RD43' rice

Ratchata Chokwiwatkul; Thanin Chantarachot; Supaporn Junbuathong; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The rice variety 'RD43' produces white grains with superior dietary characteristics, medium to low levels of apparent amylose content and rapidly available glucose.In this study, we investigated the effects of chitin-based bio-stimulant (CB) on growth, yield components, starch properties, total protein content, and antioxidant capacity of 'RD43' rice grown in a pot system.Two types of CB were developed: Type I CB derived from fermented shrimp shell with Bacillus licheniformis SK-1 mixed (FC) with rice bran, and Type II CB derived from FC blended with rice bran and rice husk.Both Type I and Type II CB were applied to soil at concentrations of 0.01%, 0.1%, and 0.2% (w/w), whereas the general practice without soil supplements was used as a control.The application of 0.2% Type II CB resulted in the maximum tiller number and the rice yield enhancement of 69.8%, while 0.2% Type I CB application increased the yield by 56.8%.This was attributed to the increase in the number of spikelets and filled grains per panicle without the increase in panicle number per plant.While neither type of CB application affected starch properties or protein content, 0.2% Type II CB significantly increased the antioxidant activity of brown seeds.These findings reveal that CB application can boost the yield of 'RD43' rice and preserve starch quality and protein content.Moreover, the enhanced antioxidant activity further underscores the CB potential to elevate 'RD43' rice as a functional food, supporting both yield and health benefits in rice production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 0.2% Type II chitin-based biostimulant gave the maximum tiller number in rice compared with the control.

Treatment
0.2% Type II CBe0
Outcome
tiller numbere0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
the general practice without soil supplementse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RD43' rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of 0.2% Type II CB resulted in the maximum tiller number and the rice yield enhancement of 69.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–867 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas the general practice without soil supplements was used as a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 0.2% Type II chitin-based biostimulant enhanced rice yield by 69.8% compared with the control.

Treatment
0.2% Type II CBe0
Outcome
rice yielde0
Direction
enhancemente0
Value
69.8%e0
Comparator
the general practice without soil supplementse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RD43' rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“The application of 0.2% Type II CB resulted in the maximum tiller number and the rice yield enhancement of 69.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–867 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas the general practice without soil supplements was used as a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying 0.2% Type I chitin-based biostimulant increased rice yield by 56.8% compared with the control.

Treatment
0.2% Type I CB applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
56.8%e0
Comparator
the general practice without soil supplementse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RD43' rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“0.2% Type I CB application increased the yield by 56.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 875–930 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas the general practice without soil supplements was used as a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–754 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield gain was attributed to more spikelets and filled grains per panicle without more panicles per plant.

Outcome
number of spikelets and filled grains per paniclee0
Qualifier
without the increase in panicle number per plante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RD43' rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“the increase in the number of spikelets and filled grains per panicle without the increase in panicle number per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1072 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither type of chitin-based biostimulant application affected starch properties or total protein content.

Treatment
CB applicatione0
Outcome
starch properties or protein contente0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0
Comparator
the general practice without soil supplementse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RD43' rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“neither type of CB application affected starch properties or protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1155 · show in text ↑
e1

“whereas the general practice without soil supplements was used as a control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–754 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

0.2% Type II chitin-based biostimulant significantly increased the antioxidant activity of brown rice seeds.

Organ / stage
brown seedse0
Treatment
0.2% Type II CBe0
Outcome
antioxidant activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“RD43' rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–89 · show in text ↑
e0

“0.2% Type II CB significantly increased the antioxidant activity of brown seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1236 · show in text ↑

resistance inducer · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

resistance inducer · quality: phytochemicals · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

resistance inducer · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.