Paper · 2013 · Madras Agricultural Journal

Influence of Nutrients, Organics and Bio-agents on Growth, Yield, Leaf Nutrient Status and Economics of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench) “CoBhH 1”

Balasankar D; Natarajan S; Pugalendhi L; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The present experiment was carried out on okra ‘COBhH 1’ during 2010-11 with the objective of studying the influence of nutrients, organics and bio-agents on growth, yield, leaf nutrient status and economics of okra. The results pooled over two seasons indicated that application of Pseudomonas fluorescens (seed treatment @ 10g kg-1 + soil application @ 2.5 kg ha-1 with FYM and foliar spray of humic acid @ 0.2 per cent improved the growth, yield and leaf nutrient contents. The parameters such as plant height, fruit length, fruit girth, fruit weight, fruits per plant, fruit yield per plant and per ha marketable fruit yield per plant and per ha were found highest with application of P. fluorescens. The shortestinter nodal length, the lowest first flowering node, earliness in flowering and higher leaf nutrient content of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S and micronutrients were observed with application of 0.2 % humic acid as foliar spray. The highest net return per hectare and benefit cost ratio were observed with application ofP. fluorescens.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pseudomonas fluorescens improved okra growth, yield and leaf nutrient contents.

Treatment
Pseudomonas fluorescens (seed treatment @ 10g kg-1 + soil application @ 2.5 kg ha-1 with FYM and foliar spray of humic acid @ 0.2 per cente0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
growth, yield and leaf nutrient contentse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of Pseudomonas fluorescens (seed treatment @ 10g kg-1 + soil application @ 2.5 kg ha-1 with FYM and foliar spray of humic acid @ 0.2 per cent improved the growth, yield and leaf nutrient contents.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–476 · show in text ↑
e1

“on okra ‘COBhH 1’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens gave the highest plant height, fruit size, fruit weight, fruit number and yield.

Treatment
application of P. fluorescense0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, fruit length, fruit girth, fruit weight, fruits per plant, fruit yield per plant and per ha marketable fruit yield per plant and per hae0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, fruit length, fruit girth, fruit weight, fruits per plant, fruit yield per plant and per ha marketable fruit yield per plant and per ha were found highest with application of P. fluorescens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–704 · show in text ↑
e1

“on okra ‘COBhH 1’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar humic acid gave shortest internodal length, lowest first flowering node and earlier flowering.

Treatment
application of 0.2 % humic acid as foliar spraye0
Outcome
shortestinter nodal length, the lowest first flowering node, earliness in floweringe0
Direction
shorteste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The shortestinter nodal length, the lowest first flowering node, earliness in flowering and higher leaf nutrient content of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S and micronutrients were observed with application of 0.2 % humic acid as foliar spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 705–934 · show in text ↑
e1

“on okra ‘COBhH 1’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar humic acid gave higher leaf N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S and micronutrient content.

Treatment
application of 0.2 % humic acid as foliar spraye0
Outcome
leaf nutrient content of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S and micronutrientse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher leaf nutrient content of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S and micronutrients were observed with application of 0.2 % humic acid as foliar spray.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–934 · show in text ↑
e1

“on okra ‘COBhH 1’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

P. fluorescens produced the highest net return and benefit cost ratio.

Treatment
application ofP. fluorescense0
Interactor
P. fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense0symbiont
Outcome
net return per hectare and benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest net return per hectare and benefit cost ratio were observed with application ofP. fluorescens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 935–1041 · show in text ↑
e1

“on okra ‘COBhH 1’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 39–56 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

application · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 112 positive, 3 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

phosphorus · Pseudomonas fluorescens · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · phenology · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.