Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT)

Effect of Humic Acid Application Methods on Nutrients Availability and Growth and Yield of Okra(ABELMOSCHUS ESCULLANTUS L.)

Amin Hussain Jabal

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station, College of Agriculture, University of Basrah during the growing season of 2021- 2022 to study the effect of adding humic acids either to soil or spraying on plant along with recommended chemical fertilizers(NPK) on availability of N, P, and K and EC and pH of soil as well as growth and yield of okra. The results showed an increase in the availability of N,P and K by adding humic acid to the soil while spraying of humic acid had no clear differences with chemical fertilizers treatments. Addition of humic acid to soil decreased EC while addition as foliar application increase EC of soil. Addition of humic acid along with chemical fertilizers to soil or spraying on plant led to an increase in concentrations of N, P, and K in the leaves and their uptake with superiority of spraying treatment over soil application treatments. Increasing humic acid level spraying on plant from 0.5 to 1.0gL-1 significantly decreased N,P and K concentrations and uptakes. Similar findings were obtained for dry matter and fruits yield. The lower the level of humic acid ,The higher the dry matter and yield. The highest value of okra fruit yield 2791.06 kgha-1 was obtained with treatment involved spraying of 0.5gL-1 humic acid plus full recommended chemical fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-applied humic acid increased available soil N, P and K.

Treatment
adding humic acid to the soile0
Outcome
availability of N,P and Ke0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed an increase in the availability of N,P and K by adding humic acid to the soil while spraying of humic acid had no clear differences with chemical fertilizers treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar humic acid showed no clear difference from chemical fertilizer treatments for soil N, P and K availability.

Treatment
spraying of humic acide0
Outcome
availability of N,P and Ke0
Direction
no clear differencese0
Comparator
chemical fertilizers treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed an increase in the availability of N,P and K by adding humic acid to the soil while spraying of humic acid had no clear differences with chemical fertilizers treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 373–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil-applied humic acid decreased soil EC.

Treatment
Addition of humic acid to soile0
Outcome
ECe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of humic acid to soil decreased EC while addition as foliar application increase EC of soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar-applied humic acid increased soil EC.

Treatment
addition as foliar applicatione0
Outcome
EC of soile0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of humic acid to soil decreased EC while addition as foliar application increase EC of soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–663 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid with chemical fertilizers increased N, P and K concentrations in okra leaves.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
humic acid along with chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
concentrations of N, P, and K in the leavese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of humic acid along with chemical fertilizers to soil or spraying on plant led to an increase in concentrations of N, P, and K in the leaves and their uptake with superiority of spraying treatment over soil application treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid with chemical fertilizers increased okra N, P and K uptake.

Treatment
humic acid along with chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
N, P, and K in the leaves and their uptakee0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of humic acid along with chemical fertilizers to soil or spraying on plant led to an increase in concentrations of N, P, and K in the leaves and their uptake with superiority of spraying treatment over soil application treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar humic acid outperformed soil application for leaf nutrient concentration and uptake.

Treatment
spraying treatmente0
Outcome
Nutrients Availabilityt0
Direction
superioritye0
Comparator
soil application treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“with superiority of spraying treatment over soil application treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–903 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of Humic Acid Application Methods on Nutrients Availability and Growth and Yield of Okra(ABELMOSCHUS ESCULLANTUS L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising foliar humic acid from 0.5 to 1.0gL-1 significantly decreased leaf N, P and K concentrations.

Treatment
humic acid level spraying on plant from 0.5 to 1.0gL-1e0
Outcome
N,P and K concentrationse0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
0.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing humic acid level spraying on plant from 0.5 to 1.0gL-1 significantly decreased N,P and K concentrations and uptakes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising foliar humic acid from 0.5 to 1.0gL-1 significantly decreased N, P and K uptake.

Treatment
humic acid level spraying on plant from 0.5 to 1.0gL-1e0
Outcome
N,P and K concentrations and uptakese0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
0.5e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing humic acid level spraying on plant from 0.5 to 1.0gL-1 significantly decreased N,P and K concentrations and uptakes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 904–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower humic acid levels gave higher dry matter.

Treatment
lower the level of humic acide0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower the level of humic acid ,The higher the dry matter and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower humic acid levels gave higher yield.

Treatment
lower the level of humic acide0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lower the level of humic acid ,The higher the dry matter and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“Okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–95 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 0.5gL-1 humic acid with full recommended fertilizer produced the maximum okra fruit yield of 2791.06 kgha-1.

Treatment
spraying of 0.5gL-1 humic acid plus full recommended chemical fertilizerse0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2791.06 kgha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest value of okra fruit yield 2791.06 kgha-1 was obtained with treatment involved spraying of 0.5gL-1 humic acid plus full recommended chemical fertilizers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1332 · show in text ↑

application · soil: chemistry · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

other · soil: chemistry · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

other · growth · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 30 positive, 2 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

67 papers: 62 positive, 5 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

application · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 112 positive, 3 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

fertilization · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

373 papers: 355 positive, 18 negative or no effect

354 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

369 papers more in this group

See all 373 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.