Paper · 2025 · Horticulturae

Influence of Mineral Fertilizers and Application Methods on Raspberry Composition Cultivated in an Acid Soil

Biljana Sikirić; Vesna Mrvić; Nikola Koković; et al.

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Acid soils are often a limiting factor in the production of most cultivated plants. In practice, the application of inadequate, physiologically acidic fertilizers, urea and NPK, is often encountered, which further worsens the already poor physicochemical properties of such soils. In this study, the influence of different amounts of NPK and urea fertilizers and methods of their application on the chemical properties of a very acidic soil and the accumulation of essential biogenic elements (N, P, K, Ca, Mg, and Al) in raspberry plants (leaves and fruits) was evaluated. The field trial with the raspberry plants was set up on a very acidic soil (pH in KCl 3.6), type Dystric Cambisol, and was monitored for 2 years. The application of NPK and urea mainly increased soil acidity in the second year in all treatments (for 0.10–0.18 pH unit) (except for urea applied in rows). The application of higher amounts of NPK increased the content of available forms of P (for 9.3–30.8 mg/kg) and K (for 57–95 mg/kg) in soil in both years, as well as exchangeable Ca (for 200–510 mg/kg) and Mg in the first year (15–165 mg/kg). The introduction of fertilizers in rows, compared to fertilization of the entire surface, influenced the reduction in mobile Al (especially when applying NPK, from 5.89 to 7.13 mg/100 g), the increase in mineral N and K content in the soil, and the increase in Ca and Mg only when applying urea, i.e., P when applying NPK in rows. In the leaves, the application of fertilizers in rows increased the content of Ca and Mg in the first year and P and K in the second year. In the fruits, the content of all estimated elements was not in correlation with their content in leaves and the fertilizer application, which indicates the influence of other ecological and biological factors on plant nutrition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK and urea mainly increased soil acidity in the second year in all treatments of raspberry plantings.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Treatment
NPK and ureae1
Outcome
soil aciditye1
Direction
increasede1
Value
0.10–0.18 pH unite1
Qualifier
except for urea applied in rowse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of NPK and urea mainly increased soil acidity in the second year in all treatments (for 0.10–0.18 pH unit) (except for urea applied in rows)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–876 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher amounts of NPK increased available P in soil in both years.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Treatment
higher amounts of NPKe2
Outcome
available forms of Pe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
9.3–30.8 mg/kge2
Qualifier
in both yearse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of higher amounts of NPK increased the content of available forms of P (for 9.3–30.8 mg/kg) and K (for 57–95 mg/kg) in soil in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher amounts of NPK increased available K in soil in both years.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Treatment
higher amounts of NPKe2
Outcome
Ke2
Direction
increasede2
Value
57–95 mg/kge2
Qualifier
in both yearse2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of higher amounts of NPK increased the content of available forms of P (for 9.3–30.8 mg/kg) and K (for 57–95 mg/kg) in soil in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1031 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher amounts of NPK increased exchangeable Ca in soil.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Treatment
higher amounts of NPKe2
Outcome
exchangeable Cae3
Direction
increasede2
Value
200–510 mg/kge3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of higher amounts of NPK increased the content of available forms of P (for 9.3–30.8 mg/kg) and K (for 57–95 mg/kg) in soil in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1031 · show in text ↑
e3

“as well as exchangeable Ca (for 200–510 mg/kg) and Mg in the first year (15–165 mg/kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher amounts of NPK increased exchangeable Mg in soil in the first year.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Treatment
higher amounts of NPKe2
Outcome
Mge3
Direction
increasede2
Value
15–165 mg/kge3
Qualifier
in the first yeare3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of higher amounts of NPK increased the content of available forms of P (for 9.3–30.8 mg/kg) and K (for 57–95 mg/kg) in soil in both years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1031 · show in text ↑
e3

“as well as exchangeable Ca (for 200–510 mg/kg) and Mg in the first year (15–165 mg/kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application in rows, compared with the entire surface, reduced mobile Al in soil, especially with NPK.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Treatment
fertilizers in rowse4
Outcome
mobile Ale4
Direction
reductione4
Value
from 5.89 to 7.13 mg/100 ge4
Comparator
fertilization of the entire surfacee4

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e4

“The introduction of fertilizers in rows, compared to fertilization of the entire surface, influenced the reduction in mobile Al (especially when applying NPK, from 5.89 to 7.13 mg/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer application in rows increased mineral N and K content in soil.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Treatment
fertilizers in rowse4
Outcome
mineral N and K contente5
Direction
increasee5
Comparator
fertilization of the entire surfacee4

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e4

“The introduction of fertilizers in rows, compared to fertilization of the entire surface, influenced the reduction in mobile Al (especially when applying NPK, from 5.89 to 7.13 mg/100 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1121–1307 · show in text ↑
e5

“the increase in mineral N and K content in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1360 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea increased soil Ca and Mg only when applied in rows.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Treatment
ureae6
Outcome
Ca and Mge6
Direction
increasee6
Qualifier
only when applying ureae6

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e6

“the increase in Ca and Mg only when applying urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers applied in rows increased leaf Ca and Mg content in the first year.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Organ / stage
leavese7
Treatment
fertilizers in rowse7
Outcome
content of Ca and Mge7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
in the first yeare7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e7

“In the leaves, the application of fertilizers in rows increased the content of Ca and Mg in the first year and P and K in the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1589 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizers applied in rows increased leaf P and K content in the second year.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Organ / stage
leavese7
Treatment
fertilizers in rowse7
Outcome
P and Ke7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
in the second yeare7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e7

“In the leaves, the application of fertilizers in rows increased the content of Ca and Mg in the first year and P and K in the second year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1452–1589 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit element content was not correlated with leaf element content or with fertilizer application.

Taxon
Raspberryt0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
fertilizer applicatione0
Outcome
content of all estimated elementse0
Direction
no_changeinferrede0

Verbatim

t0

“Raspberry Composition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–81 · show in text ↑
e0

“In the fruits, the content of all estimated elements was not in correlation with their content in leaves and the fertilizer application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1726 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

nitrogen · quality: sugar starch · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Rubus idaeus (red raspberry)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.