Paper · 2025 · Iraqi Journal of Market Research and Consumer Protection

THE EFFECT OF SOAKING WITH ATONIC, INOCULATION WITH BIO FERTILIZERS AND ORGANIC FERTILIZATION WITH WATER HYACINTHS COMPOST ON SOME GROWTH INDICATORS OF TUBEROSE PLANT (POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)

Z. H. Ali; S.A. Abdul-Latif

8
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The factorial experiment was conducted in green canopy of Department of Horticulture and Garden Engineering - College of Agricultural Engineering Sciences- University of Baghdad, for the spring season of 2022, to study the effect of soaking Polianthes tuberosa L. bulbs in Atonic solution and inoculation with bacterial biofertilizer Stenotrophomonas malophilia and fungal biofertilizer Glomus mosseae, along with the addition of two levels (3% and 4%) of water hyacinths compost (C:N=17) on some vegetative and floral growth traits of Peral variety of tuberose. The study was conducted using a randomized completely block design with three replicates. Tuberose bulbs were planted in black plastic bags containing 6 kg of a sandy loam soil. The total number of experimental units was 72, with each experimental unit containing 5 plants, resulting in a total of 360 plants in the experiment. The results showed that soaking the bulbs for 12 hours in Atonic before planting, as well as inoculation with biofertilizers and organic fertilization, led to a significant increase in all the studied vegetative and floral growth traits of this plant. The results of the triple interaction between the study factors showed the superiority of the treatment involving soaking with Atonic, inoculation with the biofertilizer combination, and fertilization with a 4% level of water hyacinths compost, significantly affecting the carbohydrate content, iron and manganese concentration in the leaves, fresh Peduncle weight, number of florets per plant and the number of bulbs. The recorded values were 4.271%, 549.7 mg kg-1 dry weight, 73.0 mg kg-1 dry weight, 126.70 g, and 55.33 flower plant-1, and 17 bulbs plant-1, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soaking tuberose bulbs for 12 hours in Atonic significantly increased all studied vegetative and floral growth traits.

Taxon
(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)t0
Treatment
soaking the bulbs for 12 hours in Atonic before plantinge1
Outcome
all the studied vegetative and floral growth traitse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–191 · show in text ↑
e1

“soaking the bulbs for 12 hours in Atonic before planting, as well as inoculation with biofertilizers and organic fertilization, led to a significant increase in all the studied vegetative and floral growth traits of this plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with biofertilizers significantly increased all studied vegetative and floral growth traits of tuberose.

Taxon
(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)t0
Treatment
inoculation with biofertilizerse1
Interactor
Glomus mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee2symbiont
Second interactor
Stenotrophomonas malophiliae2symbiont
Outcome
all the studied vegetative and floral growth traitse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–191 · show in text ↑
e1

“soaking the bulbs for 12 hours in Atonic before planting, as well as inoculation with biofertilizers and organic fertilization, led to a significant increase in all the studied vegetative and floral growth traits of this plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1141 · show in text ↑
e2

“soaking Polianthes tuberosa L. bulbs in Atonic solution and inoculation with bacterial biofertilizer Stenotrophomonas malophilia and fungal biofertilizer Glomus mosseae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilization significantly increased all studied vegetative and floral growth traits of tuberose.

Taxon
(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)t0
Treatment
organic fertilizatione1
Outcome
all the studied vegetative and floral growth traitse1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–191 · show in text ↑
e1

“soaking the bulbs for 12 hours in Atonic before planting, as well as inoculation with biofertilizers and organic fertilization, led to a significant increase in all the studied vegetative and floral growth traits of this plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined soaking, inoculation and 4% water hyacinth compost treatment raised carbohydrate content in the leaves.

Taxon
(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)t0
Treatment
soaking with Atonic, inoculation with the biofertilizer combination, and fertilization with a 4% level of water hyacinths composte1
Outcome
carbohydrate contente1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
4.271%e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–191 · show in text ↑
e1

“showed the superiority of the treatment involving soaking with Atonic, inoculation with the biofertilizer combination, and fertilization with a 4% level of water hyacinths compost, significantly affecting the carbohydrate content, iron and manganese concentration in the leaves, fresh Peduncle weight, number of florets per plant and the number of bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1560 · show in text ↑
e2

“The recorded values were 4.271%, 549.7 mg kg-1 dry weight, 73.0 mg kg-1 dry weight, 126.70 g, and 55.33 flower plant-1, and 17 bulbs plant-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment raised iron and manganese concentration in the leaves.

Taxon
(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)t0
Treatment
soaking with Atonic, inoculation with the biofertilizer combination, and fertilization with a 4% level of water hyacinths composte1
Outcome
iron and manganese concentration in the leavese1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
549.7 mg kg-1 dry weight, 73.0 mg kg-1 dry weighte2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–191 · show in text ↑
e1

“showed the superiority of the treatment involving soaking with Atonic, inoculation with the biofertilizer combination, and fertilization with a 4% level of water hyacinths compost, significantly affecting the carbohydrate content, iron and manganese concentration in the leaves, fresh Peduncle weight, number of florets per plant and the number of bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1560 · show in text ↑
e2

“The recorded values were 4.271%, 549.7 mg kg-1 dry weight, 73.0 mg kg-1 dry weight, 126.70 g, and 55.33 flower plant-1, and 17 bulbs plant-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment raised fresh peduncle weight.

Taxon
(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)t0
Treatment
soaking with Atonic, inoculation with the biofertilizer combination, and fertilization with a 4% level of water hyacinths composte1
Outcome
fresh Peduncle weighte1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
126.70 ge2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–191 · show in text ↑
e1

“showed the superiority of the treatment involving soaking with Atonic, inoculation with the biofertilizer combination, and fertilization with a 4% level of water hyacinths compost, significantly affecting the carbohydrate content, iron and manganese concentration in the leaves, fresh Peduncle weight, number of florets per plant and the number of bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1560 · show in text ↑
e2

“The recorded values were 4.271%, 549.7 mg kg-1 dry weight, 73.0 mg kg-1 dry weight, 126.70 g, and 55.33 flower plant-1, and 17 bulbs plant-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment raised the number of florets per plant.

Taxon
(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)t0
Treatment
soaking with Atonic, inoculation with the biofertilizer combination, and fertilization with a 4% level of water hyacinths composte1
Outcome
number of florets per plante1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
55.33 flower plant-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–191 · show in text ↑
e1

“showed the superiority of the treatment involving soaking with Atonic, inoculation with the biofertilizer combination, and fertilization with a 4% level of water hyacinths compost, significantly affecting the carbohydrate content, iron and manganese concentration in the leaves, fresh Peduncle weight, number of florets per plant and the number of bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1560 · show in text ↑
e2

“The recorded values were 4.271%, 549.7 mg kg-1 dry weight, 73.0 mg kg-1 dry weight, 126.70 g, and 55.33 flower plant-1, and 17 bulbs plant-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment raised the number of bulbs per plant.

Taxon
(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)t0
Treatment
soaking with Atonic, inoculation with the biofertilizer combination, and fertilization with a 4% level of water hyacinths composte1
Outcome
the number of bulbse1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Value
17 bulbs plant-1e2

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“(POLIANTHES TUBEROSA L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 167–191 · show in text ↑
e1

“showed the superiority of the treatment involving soaking with Atonic, inoculation with the biofertilizer combination, and fertilization with a 4% level of water hyacinths compost, significantly affecting the carbohydrate content, iron and manganese concentration in the leaves, fresh Peduncle weight, number of florets per plant and the number of bulbs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1560 · show in text ↑
e2

“The recorded values were 4.271%, 549.7 mg kg-1 dry weight, 73.0 mg kg-1 dry weight, 126.70 g, and 55.33 flower plant-1, and 17 bulbs plant-1, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1716 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

application · growth · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · growth · Agave amica (tuberose)Results agree

30 papers: 30 positive, 0 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.