Paper · 2025 · Agriculture

Responses of Tomato Growth and Soil Environment Properties to Integrated Deficit Water-Biogas Slurry Application Under Indirect Subsurface Drip Irrigation

Peng Xiang; Jian Zheng; Panpan Fan; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

To explore the feasibility of integrated deficit water-biogas slurry irrigation under indirect subsurface drip irrigation, three deficit irrigation levels (60%FC, 70%FC, and 80%FC; FC represents field capacity) were established during the three growth stages of tomatoes. The results indicated that biogas slurry irrigation treatments increased the soil organic matter content in the root zone and water use efficiency (WUE) and reduced soil pH. As the degree of deficit increased, the plant height and stem diameter of tomatoes decreased significantly (p < 0.05), particularly during the seedling and flowering-fruiting stages. A mild deficit during the seedling stage was beneficial for subsequent plant growth, yielding maximum leaf area (6871.42 cm2 plant−1). Moderate deficit treatment at the seedling stage maximized yield, which was 19.79% higher than the control treatment in 2020 and 19.22% higher in 2021. The WUE of severe deficit treatment at the maturity stage increased by 26.6% (2020) and 31.04% (2021) compared to the control treatment. Comprehensive evaluation using TOPSIS combined with the weighted method revealed that severe deficit treatment at the maturity stage provided the best comprehensive benefits for tomatoes. In summary, deficit irrigation at different growth stages positively influenced tomato growth, quality, and soil environment in response to water-biogas slurry irrigation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas slurry irrigation increased root-zone soil organic matter and water use efficiency.

Treatment
biogas slurry irrigation treatmentse0
Outcome
soil organic matter content in the root zone and water use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“biogas slurry irrigation treatments increased the soil organic matter content in the root zone and water use efficiency (WUE)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 299–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biogas slurry irrigation reduced soil pH.

Treatment
biogas slurryt0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and reduced soil pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–445 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato Growth and Soil Environment Properties to Integrated Deficit Water-Biogas Slurry Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–112 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing water deficit significantly reduced tomato height and stem diameter.

Treatment
degree of deficite0
Outcome
plant height and stem diametere0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
p < 0.05e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“As the degree of deficit increased, the plant height and stem diameter of tomatoes decreased significantly (p < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–563 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A mild seedling-stage deficit produced maximum later leaf area.

Treatment
mild deficit during the seedling stagee0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
maximume0
Value
6871.42 cm2 plant−1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A mild deficit during the seedling stage was beneficial for subsequent plant growth, yielding maximum leaf area (6871.42 cm2 plant−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–763 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate seedling-stage deficit increased 2020 yield by 19.79% versus control.

Treatment
Moderate deficit treatment at the seedling stagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
19.79%e0
Qualifier
2020e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate deficit treatment at the seedling stage maximized yield, which was 19.79% higher than the control treatment in 2020 and 19.22% higher in 2021.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate seedling-stage deficit increased 2021 yield by 19.22% versus control.

Treatment
Moderate deficit treatment at the seedling stagee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
19.22%e0
Qualifier
2021e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Moderate deficit treatment at the seedling stage maximized yield, which was 19.79% higher than the control treatment in 2020 and 19.22% higher in 2021.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 764–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe maturity-stage deficit increased 2020 water use efficiency by 26.6% versus control.

Treatment
severe deficit treatment at the maturity stagee0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.6%e0
Qualifier
2020e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WUE of severe deficit treatment at the maturity stage increased by 26.6% (2020) and 31.04% (2021) compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe maturity-stage deficit increased 2021 water use efficiency by 31.04% versus control.

Treatment
severe deficit treatment at the maturity stagee0
Outcome
WUEe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
31.04%e0
Qualifier
2021e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The WUE of severe deficit treatment at the maturity stage increased by 26.6% (2020) and 31.04% (2021) compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1052 · show in text ↑
t0

“Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–19 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined TOPSIS evaluation ranked severe maturity-stage deficit as best for tomato benefits.

Treatment
severe deficit treatment at the maturity stagee0
Outcome
best comprehensive benefitse0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comprehensive evaluation using TOPSIS combined with the weighted method revealed that severe deficit treatment at the maturity stage provided the best comprehensive benefits for tomatoes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1240 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

41 papers: 33 positive, 8 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

76 papers: 62 positive, 14 negative or no effect

61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

72 papers more in this group

See all 76 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 117 positive, 30 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

harvest time · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.