Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Advanced Biochemistry Research

Optimizing fertility levels and spacing for enhanced nutritional quality in garden pea (Pisum sativum L) in the North-Western Himalayas

Shipra Thakur; Viveka Katoch; Aditya Barwal; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during 2019-20 and 2020-21 at Vegetable farm of Department of vegetable science, CSKHPKV, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh, India to study the effect of different plant spacings and fertility levels on the quality parameters of powdery mildew resistant pyramid line of garden pea (Pisum sativum L.) line 1-2. The treatments included three plant spacings (30×10 cm, 45×10 cm, and 60×10 cm) and four fertility levels i.e. 100% recommended dose of fertilizers (RDF), 75% RDF, 125% RDF and 50% N through urea + 50% N through farmyard manure (FYM) + 100% PK. Results revealed that spacing did not significantly influence any of the quality traits across the years. However, fertility levels had a significant effect, with the integrated nutrient treatment recording the highest TSS (18.24 °Brix) and ascorbic acid content (21.92 mg/100 g), while 125% RDF gave the maximum crude protein content (20.90%). The standard check Azad Pea-1consistently showed the lowest values across all parameters. These findings underscore the importance of optimized nutrient management, particularly the integration of organic and inorganic sources in improving the nutritional quality of garden pea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant spacing did not significantly influence any quality trait of garden pea.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
spacinge0
Outcome
quality traitse0
Direction
did not significantly influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
e0

“spacing did not significantly influence any of the quality traits across the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 603–685 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated nutrient treatment gave the highest TSS, 18.24 °Brix, in garden pea.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
integrated nutrient treatmente1
Outcome
TSSe1
Direction
higheste1
Value
18.24 °Brixe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertility levels had a significant effect, with the integrated nutrient treatment recording the highest TSS (18.24 °Brix) and ascorbic acid content (21.92 mg/100 g), while 125% RDF gave the maximum crude protein content (20.90%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated nutrient treatment gave the highest ascorbic acid content, 21.92 mg/100 g, in garden pea.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
integrated nutrient treatmente1
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente1
Direction
higheste1
Value
21.92 mg/100 ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertility levels had a significant effect, with the integrated nutrient treatment recording the highest TSS (18.24 °Brix) and ascorbic acid content (21.92 mg/100 g), while 125% RDF gave the maximum crude protein content (20.90%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–924 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

125% RDF gave the maximum crude protein content, 20.90%, in garden pea.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
125% RDFe1
Outcome
crude protein contente1
Direction
maximume1
Value
20.90%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertility levels had a significant effect, with the integrated nutrient treatment recording the highest TSS (18.24 °Brix) and ascorbic acid content (21.92 mg/100 g), while 125% RDF gave the maximum crude protein content (20.90%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 696–924 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The standard check Azad Pea-1 showed the lowest values across all quality parameters.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
Material
Azad Pea-1e2
Outcome
values across all parameterse2
Direction
loweste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
e2

“The standard check Azad Pea-1consistently showed the lowest values across all parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1014 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Optimized nutrient management, including integrated organic and inorganic sources, is recommended to improve the nutritional quality of garden pea.

Taxon
garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
integration of organic and inorganic sourcese3
Outcome
nutritional qualitye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“garden pea (Pisum sativum L)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
e3

“the integration of organic and inorganic sources in improving the nutritional quality of garden pea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1203 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

density · quality: general · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.