Abstract
The effect of date of sowing (15th October, 5th November and 25th November), method of sowing (Raised bed and flatbed) and seed rate (100, 112.5 and 125 kg/ha) was evaluated on growth, yield and seed quality attributes in garden pea cv. Pusa Pragati under field conditions. Date of sowing significantly affected the growth, yield and seed quality parameters. Sowing on 15th October (DOS 1) resulted in earliest emergence and days taken to initiate flowering whereas sowing on 25th November (DOS 3) needed longest duration for both these characters. Plant height and number of primary branches per plant was recorded highest for DOS 1 and the lowest for DOS 3. The yield traits (pods per plant, pod length, seeds per pod and seed yield per plant) and seed quality traits (seed index, germination, seedling length and dry weight, vigour indices) were recorded maximum for DOS 2 (sowing on 5th November) and minimum for DOS 1. Electrical conductivity results also showed that DOS 2 and DOS 3 had better seed quality than DOS 1. Method of sowing could not affect significantly on most of the plant growth parameters except plant height but seed yield/plant and seeds/pod were higher in raised bed method of sowing. Most of the quality parameters were quantitatively higher in raised bed but it was statistically at par with flatbed. Seed rate also could not affect the most of the growth, yield attributes and quality traits but seed yield per plant was increased on increasing the seed rate
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing date significantly affected garden pea growth, yield and seed quality.
- Taxon
- garden pea
Lathyrus oleraceust0 - Treatment
- Date of sowinge0
- Outcome
- growth, yield and seed quality parameterse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Date of sowing significantly affected the growth, yield and seed quality parameters”
t0“garden pea”
Claim · model-written summary
October 15 sowing produced earliest emergence and flowering initiation; November 25 required the longest duration for both.
- Taxon
- garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Sowing on 15th Octobere0
- Outcome
- emergence and days taken to initiate floweringe0
- Direction
- earlieste0
- Comparator
- sowing on 25th Novembere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Sowing on 15th October (DOS 1) resulted in earliest emergence and days taken to initiate flowering whereas sowing on 25th November (DOS 3) needed longest duration for both these characters”
t0“garden pea”
Claim · model-written summary
October 15 sowing gave the highest plant height and primary branch number, while November 25 gave the lowest.
- Taxon
- garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- DOS 1e0
- Outcome
- Plant height and number of primary branches per plante0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Comparator
- DOS 3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plant height and number of primary branches per plant was recorded highest for DOS 1 and the lowest for DOS 3”
t0“garden pea”
Claim · model-written summary
November 5 sowing maximized pod traits and seed yield, while October 15 minimized them.
- Taxon
- garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- DOS 2e0
- Outcome
- pods per plant, pod length, seeds per pod and seed yield per plante0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- DOS 1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield traits (pods per plant, pod length, seeds per pod and seed yield per plant) and seed quality traits (seed index, germination, seedling length and dry weight, vigour indices) were recorded maximum for DOS 2 (sowing on 5th November) and minimum for DOS 1”
t0“garden pea”
Claim · model-written summary
November 5 sowing maximized seed quality traits, while October 15 minimized them.
- Taxon
- garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- DOS 2e0
- Outcome
- seed index, germination, seedling length and dry weight, vigour indicese0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- DOS 1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The yield traits (pods per plant, pod length, seeds per pod and seed yield per plant) and seed quality traits (seed index, germination, seedling length and dry weight, vigour indices) were recorded maximum for DOS 2 (sowing on 5th November) and minimum for DOS 1”
t0“garden pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Electrical conductivity indicated better seed quality for November 5 and November 25 than October 15 sowing.
- Taxon
- garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- DOS 2 and DOS 3e0
- Outcome
- seed qualitye0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- DOS 1e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Electrical conductivity results also showed that DOS 2 and DOS 3 had better seed quality than DOS 1”
t0“garden pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing method did not significantly affect most garden pea growth parameters.
- Taxon
- garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Method of sowinge0
- Outcome
- most of the plant growth parameterse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Method of sowing could not affect significantly on most of the plant growth parameters except plant height”
t0“garden pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised bed sowing produced higher seed yield per plant and seeds per pod.
- Taxon
- garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- raised bed method of sowinge0
- Outcome
- seed yield/plant and seeds/pode0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed yield/plant and seeds/pod were higher in raised bed method of sowing”
t0“garden pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Raised beds gave quantitatively higher quality parameters, statistically at par with flatbeds.
- Taxon
- garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- raised bede0
- Outcome
- quality parameterse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- flatbede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Most of the quality parameters were quantitatively higher in raised bed but it was statistically at par with flatbed”
t0“garden pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed rate did not affect most growth, yield, or quality traits.
- Taxon
- garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- Seed ratee0
- Outcome
- growth, yield attributes and quality traitse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed rate also could not affect the most of the growth, yield attributes and quality traits”
t0“garden pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed yield per plant increased as seed rate increased.
- Taxon
- garden peaLathyrus oleraceust0
- Treatment
- seed ratee0
- Outcome
- seed yield per plante0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed yield per plant was increased on increasing the seed rate”
t0“garden pea”
The same questions in other papers
density · quality: general · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
tillage · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
65 papers more in this group
See all 69 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.