Paper · 2025 · Plant Biotechnology Journal

Chitin Soil Amendment Triggers Systemic Plant Disease Resistance Through Enhanced Pattern‐Triggered Immunity

Moffat Makechemu; Yukihisa Goto; Marc W. Schmid; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Chitin triggers localised and systemic plant immune responses, making it a promising treatment for sustainable disease resistance. However, the precise molecular mechanisms underlying chitin-induced systemic effects in plants remain unknown. In this study, we investigated the effects of soil amendment with crab chitin flakes (hereafter chitin) on pattern-triggered immunity (PTI) and systemic disease resistance in various plant species. We found that soil amendment with chitin potentiates PTI and disease resistance against the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in lettuce, tomato and Arabidopsis as well as against the fungal pathogen Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici (Bgt), which causes powdery mildew in wheat. Using micrografting in Arabidopsis, we demonstrated that this systemic effect is dependent on active chitin perception in the roots. We also showed that induced systemic resistance (ISR) and pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs)/coreceptors, but not systemic acquired resistance (SAR), are involved in the systemic effects triggered by chitin soil amendment. These systemic effects correlated with the transcriptional upregulation of key PTI regulators in distal leaves upon chitin soil amendment. Notably, chitin-triggered systemic immunity was independent of microbes present in soil or chitin flakes. Together, these findings contribute to a better understanding of chitin-triggered systemic immunity, from active chitin perception in roots to the potentiation of PTI in the leaves, ultimately priming plants to mount enhanced defence responses against pathogen attacks. Our study provides valuable insights into the molecular mechanisms of chitin soil amendment and resulting induced immunity and highlights its potential use for sustainable crop protection strategies.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitin soil amendment potentiated pattern-triggered immunity.

Taxon
plantt0
Treatment
soil amendment with chitine0
Outcome
PTIe0
Direction
potentiatese0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“soil amendment with chitin potentiates PTI”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitin amendment increased resistance to Pseudomonas syringae in lettuce.

Taxon
lettuceLactuca sativae0
Treatment
chitint0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato str. DC3000e0pathogen
Outcome
disease resistancee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease resistance against the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in lettuce, tomato and Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chitin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitin amendment increased resistance to Pseudomonas syringae in tomato.

Treatment
chitint0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato str. DC3000e0pathogen
Outcome
disease resistancee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease resistance against the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in lettuce, tomato and Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chitin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitin amendment increased resistance to Pseudomonas syringae in Arabidopsis.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsise0
Treatment
chitint0
Interactor
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato str. DC3000e0pathogen
Outcome
disease resistancee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“disease resistance against the bacterial pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 in lettuce, tomato and Arabidopsis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–624 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chitin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitin amendment increased wheat resistance to Blumeria graminis.

Treatment
Chitint0
Interactor
Blumeria graminis f. sp. triticiBlumeria graminis f. sp. triticie0pathogen
Outcome
powdery mildewe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici
Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici · Interactor · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Clemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“against the fungal pathogen Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici (Bgt), which causes powdery mildew in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–740 · show in text ↑
t0

“Chitin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–6 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Systemic chitin response depended on active root chitin perception.

Taxon
ArabidopsisArabidopsise0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
systemic effecte0
Qualifier
active chitin perceptione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arabidopsis
Arabidopsis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Original uploader was Brona at en.wikipedia . User:Roepers at nl.wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Using micrografting in Arabidopsis, we demonstrated that this systemic effect is dependent on active chitin perception in the roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–873 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Induced systemic resistance and pattern-recognition receptors/coreceptors participated in the systemic chitin effect.

Taxon
plantt0
Treatment
chitin soil amendmente0
Gene
pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs)/coreceptorse0
Outcome
systemic effectse0

Verbatim

e0

“induced systemic resistance (ISR) and pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs)/coreceptors, but not systemic acquired resistance (SAR), are involved in the systemic effects triggered by chitin soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Systemic acquired resistance was not involved in the chitin-triggered systemic effect.

Taxon
plantt0
Outcome
systemic effectse0
Qualifier
systemic acquired resistance (SAR)e0

Verbatim

e0

“but not systemic acquired resistance (SAR), are involved in the systemic effects triggered by chitin soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitin amendment was associated with transcriptional upregulation of key PTI regulators in distal leaves.

Taxon
plantt0
Organ / stage
distal leavese0
Treatment
chitin soil amendmente0
Outcome
transcriptional upregulation of key PTI regulatorse0
Direction
upregulatione0

Verbatim

e0

“systemic effects correlated with the transcriptional upregulation of key PTI regulators in distal leaves upon chitin soil amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1237 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chitin-triggered systemic immunity did not depend on microbes in soil or chitin flakes.

Taxon
plantt0
Outcome
systemic immunitye0
Qualifier
microbes present in soil or chitin flakese0

Verbatim

e0

“chitin-triggered systemic immunity was independent of microbes present in soil or chitin flakes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1343 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–45 · show in text ↑

resistance inducer · Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato str. DC3000 · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

resistance inducer · Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato str. DC3000 · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

resistance inducer · Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

resistance inducer · Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato str. DC3000 · ArabidopsisResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.