Paper · 2025 · Agronomy Journal

Conservation management effects on soil and agronomic properties in a furrow‐irrigated corn system in east‐central Arkansas

Jeferson P. Pimentel; Christopher G. Henry; Kris R. Brye; et al.

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Cover crops can improve soil physical properties and help to sustain agricultural crop yields. A 6‐year study conducted from 2017 to 2022 examined the effects of conservation soil management practices in a furrow‐irrigated continuous corn ( Zea mays L.) system on a silt‐loam soil (Typic Albaqualf) in the Lower Mississippi River Delta region of eastern Arkansas. This study compared the effects of conventional tillage (CT), no‐tillage (NT), and no‐tillage with cover crops (CC) in selected soil physical and chemical properties (i.e., soil bulk density ( D b ), porosity (ƒ t ), field capacity (Θ FC ), Permanent wilting point (Θ PWP ), Plant available water (Θ PAW ), Total nitrogen (TN), and Soil organic matter (SOM), grain yield, and water‐use efficiency. This study provides novel insights into the medium‐term effects of combining conservation practices like CC and NT on crop yield, irrigation decisions, and soil dynamics in furrow‐irrigated systems, a largely underexplored area in Arkansas. After 6 years of consistent management, soil properties in the upper 15 cm, including D b , ƒ t , Θ FC , Θ PWP , Θ PAW , TN, and SOM, were unaffected by treatments. The 6 years of consistent management practices were insufficient to induce substantial variations in the selected soil physical properties across the three soil managements. Averaged across years, corn yield did not differ between the CT and NT. The CC system reduced corn yield by 1.41 Mg ha −1 year −1 over the 6‐year experiment compared to the NT system alone. Overall, this medium‐term study demonstrated that corn producers can safely convert from a CT system to a NT system without a yield penalty.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil physical and chemical properties in the upper 15 cm were unaffected by soil-management treatments after six years.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
soil propertiese0
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
upper 15 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 6 years of consistent management, soil properties in the upper 15 cm, including D b , ƒ t , Θ FC , Θ PWP , Θ PAW , TN, and SOM, were unaffected by treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1176 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–91 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn yield did not differ between conventional and no tillage, averaged across years.

Treatment
NTe0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Averaged across years, corn yield did not differ between the CT and NT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1351–1422 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cover crops with no tillage reduced corn yield by 1.41 Mg ha −1 year −1 compared with no tillage alone.

Treatment
CC systeme0
Outcome
corn yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.41 Mg ha −1 year −1e0
Comparator
NT system alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The CC system reduced corn yield by 1.41 Mg ha −1 year −1 over the 6‐year experiment compared to the NT system alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1423–1540 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Corn producers can convert from conventional to no tillage without a yield penalty.

Outcome
convert from a CT system to a NT system without a yield penaltye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“corn producers can safely convert from a CT system to a NT system without a yield penalty.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1591–1681 · show in text ↑

cover crop · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 104 positive, 118 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.