Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Soil Physicochemical Properties and Rhizosphere Biota of Sorghum as Influenced by Rice Crop Residue Management Techniques and Nitrogen Levels

Pydi Mohini Kumari; S. Prathibhasree; K. Anny Mrudhula; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The current investigation was conducted on a sandy clay loam soil at the Agricultural College Farm, Bapatla, during the rabi season of 2021–2022, to examine the impact of different nitrogen levels and rice crop residue management strategies on soil physicochemical properties and rhizosphere biota of sorghum. Because the grain is frequently caught in constant rain, which causes grain molds to damage its quality, sorghum harvested during the rainy season is mostly used as feed and for other industrial purposes. But because of its high grain quality, post-rainy sorghum is mostly consumed as food. It is also a major source of stover, particularly in dry seasons. The area planted to sorghum has drastically decreased, particularly during the rainy season. However, post-rainy sorghum has remained relatively stable and is primarily grown in three districts of Karnataka (Bijapur, Gulbarga, and Raichur) and six districts of Maharashtra (Solapur, Ahmednagar, Pune, Beed, Osmanabad, and Aurangabad), in addition to portions of Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu. The experiment was laid out in split-plot design with four rice crop residue management techniques (M1: No residue, M2: Burning of residue, M3: Incorporation of residue with rotovator without application of ANGRAU decomposer and M4: Incorporation of residue with rotovator after application of ANGRAU decomposer as main plot treatments and four nitrogen levels (Control, 40 kg ha−1, 80 kg ha−1and 120 kg ha−1) as sub plot treatments. Among soil physico chemical properties, pH, EC and available phosphorous did not differ significantly among the rice crop residue management techniques and nitrogen levels whereas the highest soil organic carbon, available nitrogen and available potassium were obtained with incorporation of residue with rotovator after application of ANGRAU decomposer (M4). Soil rhizosphere biota was significantly influenced by rice crop residue management techniques and was not influenced by nitrogen levels. Mean values for rice crop residue management techniques revealed that highest bacterial population was observed with incorporation of residue with rotovator after application of ANGRAU decomposer (M4) and lowest bacterial population was observed with burning of residue (M2). Highest fungal population was observed with incorporation of residue with rotovator after application of ANGRAU decomposer (M4) and lowest fungal population was observed with no residue (M1) which was on par with burning of residue (M2). Highest actinomycetes population was observed with incorporation of residue with rotovator after application of ANGRAU decomposer (M4) which was on par with incorporation of residue with rotovator without application of ANGRAU decomposer (M3) and lowest actinomycetes population was observed with burning of residue (M2) which was on par with no residue (M1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH, EC and available phosphorus did not differ significantly among rice residue management techniques and nitrogen levels.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
rice crop residue management techniques and nitrogen levelse2
Outcome
pH, EC and available phosphorouse2
Direction
did not differ significantlye2
Setting
Agricultural College Farm, Bapatlae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere biota of sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–308 · show in text ↑
e1

“conducted on a sandy clay loam soil at the Agricultural College Farm, Bapatla, during the rabi season of 2021–2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–144 · show in text ↑
e2

“pH, EC and available phosphorous did not differ significantly among the rice crop residue management techniques and nitrogen levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1534–1665 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporating residue with a rotovator after applying ANGRAU decomposer gave the highest soil organic carbon, available nitrogen and available potassium.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
incorporation of residue with rotovator after application of ANGRAU decomposere3
Outcome
soil organic carbon, available nitrogen and available potassiume3
Direction
higheste3
Setting
Agricultural College Farm, Bapatlae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere biota of sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–308 · show in text ↑
e1

“conducted on a sandy clay loam soil at the Agricultural College Farm, Bapatla, during the rabi season of 2021–2022”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 30–144 · show in text ↑
e3

“the highest soil organic carbon, available nitrogen and available potassium were obtained with incorporation of residue with rotovator after application of ANGRAU decomposer (M4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1674–1852 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere biota of sorghum was significantly influenced by rice crop residue management techniques.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
rice crop residue management techniquese4
Outcome
rhizosphere biotae4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere biota of sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–308 · show in text ↑
e4

“Soil rhizosphere biota was significantly influenced by rice crop residue management techniques and was not influenced by nitrogen levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–1990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizosphere biota of sorghum was not influenced by nitrogen levels.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
nitrogen levelse4
Outcome
rhizosphere biotae4
Direction
was not influencede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere biota of sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–308 · show in text ↑
e4

“Soil rhizosphere biota was significantly influenced by rice crop residue management techniques and was not influenced by nitrogen levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1854–1990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporation of residue with a rotovator after applying ANGRAU decomposer gave the highest bacterial population.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
incorporation of residue with rotovator after application of ANGRAU decomposer (M4)e5
Outcome
bacterial populatione5
Direction
higheste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere biota of sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–308 · show in text ↑
e5

“highest bacterial population was observed with incorporation of residue with rotovator after application of ANGRAU decomposer (M4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2062–2192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burning of residue gave the lowest bacterial population.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
burning of residue (M2)e6
Outcome
bacterial populatione6
Direction
loweste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere biota of sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–308 · show in text ↑
e6

“lowest bacterial population was observed with burning of residue (M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2197–2266 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporation of residue with a rotovator after applying ANGRAU decomposer gave the highest fungal population.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
incorporation of residue with rotovator after application of ANGRAU decomposer (M4)e7
Outcome
fungal populatione7
Direction
Higheste7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere biota of sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–308 · show in text ↑
e7

“Highest fungal population was observed with incorporation of residue with rotovator after application of ANGRAU decomposer (M4)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2268–2395 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No residue gave the lowest fungal population, on par with burning of residue.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
no residue (M1)e1
Outcome
fungal populatione1
Direction
loweste1
Comparator
burning of residue (M2)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere biota of sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–308 · show in text ↑
e1

“lowest fungal population was observed with no residue (M1) which was on par with burning of residue (M2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2400–2504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporation of residue with a rotovator after applying ANGRAU decomposer gave the highest actinomycetes population, on par with incorporation without the decomposer.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
incorporation of residue with rotovator after application of ANGRAU decomposer (M4)e1
Outcome
actinomycetes populatione1
Direction
Higheste1
Comparator
incorporation of residue with rotovator without application of ANGRAU decomposer (M3)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere biota of sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–308 · show in text ↑
e1

“Highest actinomycetes population was observed with incorporation of residue with rotovator after application of ANGRAU decomposer (M4) which was on par with incorporation of residue with rotovator without application of ANGRAU decomposer (M3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2506–2748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Burning of residue gave the lowest actinomycetes population, on par with no residue.

Taxon
sorghumSorghume0
Treatment
burning of residue (M2)e1
Outcome
actinomycetes populatione1
Direction
lowest actinomycetes populatione1
Comparator
no residue (M1)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rhizosphere biota of sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–308 · show in text ↑
e1

“lowest actinomycetes population was observed with burning of residue (M2) which was on par with no residue (M1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2753–2864 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · soil: chemistry · SorghumPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · soil: chemistry · SorghumPositive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

organic · soil: chemistry · SorghumPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.