Paper · 2018 · International Journal Of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture

Cultivation of sorghum and sunflower in soils with amendment of sludge from industrial landfill

Leonardo Capeleto de Andrade; Robson Andreazza; Flávio Anastácio de Oliveira Camargo

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to evaluate the impacts of the amendment of industrial landfill sludge (ILS) in two different soils with cultivation of sunflower and sorghum plants. The plants grew in two types of soils (Typic Paleudult—TP, and Grossarenic Hapludult—GH) with different doses of ILS (0, 2, 5, 10, and 20 Mg ha −1 ). The evaluation of the pH, electrical conductivity, available concentrations of P, K, Ca, Mg, and Na, and the hydrolysis of FDA in the soils were tested. The height and dry mass of both plants were measured, as well as the stem diameter of the sunflower. The total concentration of Cu, Cd, Cr, and Pb was evaluated in the plants and soils, in addition to the translocation factor of those in the plants. The amendment of ILS in the soils was efficient to increase the pH and macronutrients, as to increase the biomass production. The largest production occurred with 10 Mg ha −1 , and the highest dose (20 Mg ha −1 ) had negative effects in all treatments. Both plants had low accumulation of Cu, Cd, and Pb in their tissues. Cr increased in the roots of sunflower plants (especially in the TP soil) without translocation to the shoots. The amendment of ILS in soils is an alternative to disposal with benefits to plants and soil quality. TP soil presented better results, being more secure to receive the sludge due to its higher content of clay when compared to the GH soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge amendment increased soil pH and macronutrients.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
amendment of ILSe1
Outcome
pH and macronutrientse1
Direction
increasee1
Qualifier
different doses of ILSe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum and sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e0

“with different doses of ILS (0, 2, 5, 10, and 20 Mg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 268–327 · show in text ↑
e1

“The amendment of ILS in the soils was efficient to increase the pH and macronutrients, as to increase the biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The largest biomass production of sorghum occurred at 10 Mg ha −1 of sludge.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
10 Mg ha −1e2
Outcome
productione2
Direction
higherinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum and sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e2

“The largest production occurred with 10 Mg ha −1 , and the highest dose (20 Mg ha −1 ) had negative effects in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest sludge dose of 20 Mg ha −1 had negative effects on sorghum in all treatments.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Treatment
highest dose (20 Mg ha −1 )e2
Outcome
effectse2
Direction
negative effectse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum and sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e2

“The largest production occurred with 10 Mg ha −1 , and the highest dose (20 Mg ha −1 ) had negative effects in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–983 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both sorghum and sunflower had low accumulation of Cu, Cd and Pb in their tissues.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Organ / stage
tissuese3
Outcome
accumulation of Cu, Cd, and Pbe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum and sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e3

“Both plants had low accumulation of Cu, Cd, and Pb in their tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 985–1052 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cr increased in the roots of sunflower in TP soil without translocation to the shoots.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Organ / stage
rootse4
Outcome
Cre4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
without translocation to the shootse4
Setting
TP soile4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum and sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e4

“Cr increased in the roots of sunflower plants (especially in the TP soil) without translocation to the shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1163 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TP soil gave better sorghum results than GH soil, being more secure to receive sludge because of its higher clay content.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
better resultse5
Qualifier
higher content of claye5
Comparator
GH soile5
Setting
TP soile5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum and sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e5

“TP soil presented better results, being more secure to receive the sludge due to its higher content of clay when compared to the GH soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1267–1403 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge amendment of soils is an alternative to disposal with benefits to plants and soil quality.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
alternative to disposal with benefits to plants and soil qualitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“sorghum and sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–36 · show in text ↑
e6

“The amendment of ILS in soils is an alternative to disposal with benefits to plants and soil quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1265 · show in text ↑

organic · soil: chemistry · SorghumPositive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

other · soil: chemistry · SorghumResults agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.