Paper · 2023 · Pest Management in Horticultural Ecosystems

Efficacy of thiamethoxam against whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) under open field conditions in okra

Vinod Kumar Dubey; Sanjay Kumar Sahoo; Gouri Shankar Giri; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur, Bihar, India during the summer season, 2021-22 to evaluate a neonicotinoid, thiamethoxam against whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) along with other new molecules. Among the various doses of foliar application thiamethoxam, sprayed twice at an interval of 10 days on okra, resulted in 87-90 per cent reduction over untreated control. Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30% FS formulation was also effective against B. tabaci upto 45 days from seed treatment. Foliar application of thiamethoxam (50 g a.i. per ha) gave highest yield and ICBR ratio and it was in line with the appliaction of thiamethoxam 37.5 and 25 g a.i. per ha. All the tested insecticide formulations were found to be safe for coccinellid beetles, except dimethoate 30 EC @ 600 g a.i. / ha, which have negative effect on coccinellid beetles as recorded in the okra ecosystem in comparison to the higher dose of thiamethoxam 25 WG (double dose @ 50 g a.i. ha-1). Results also showed that none of the insecticide formulations had phytotoxicity effect in okra ecosystem.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Twice sprayed thiamethoxam reduced whitefly by 87-90 per cent versus untreated control.

Treatment
thiamethoxam, sprayed twice at an interval of 10 dayse0
Interactor
Bemisia tabaciBemisia tabacit0pest
Outcome
whiteflyt0
Direction
reductione0
Value
87-90 per cente0
Comparator
untreated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“thiamethoxam, sprayed twice at an interval of 10 days on okra, resulted in 87-90 per cent reduction over untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–441 · show in text ↑
t0

“whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–69 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam seed treatment was effective against B. tabaci for up to 45 days.

Treatment
Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30% FS formulatione0
Interactor
B. tabaciBemisia tabacie0pest
Outcome
B. tabacie0
Qualifier
upto 45 dayse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Bemisia tabaci
Bemisia tabaci · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed treatment with thiamethoxam 30% FS formulation was also effective against B. tabaci upto 45 days from seed treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 443–564 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar thiamethoxam at 50 g a.i. per ha gave the highest okra yield.

Treatment
Foliar application of thiamethoxam (50 g a.i. per ha)e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of thiamethoxam (50 g a.i. per ha) gave highest yield and ICBR ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar thiamethoxam at 50 g a.i. per ha gave the highest ICBR ratio.

Treatment
Foliar application of thiamethoxam (50 g a.i. per ha)e0
Outcome
ICBR ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of thiamethoxam (50 g a.i. per ha) gave highest yield and ICBR ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiamethoxam at 37.5 and 25 g a.i. per ha was in line with the highest-yielding 50 g dose.

Outcome
yielde1
Comparator
thiamethoxam 37.5 and 25 g a.i. per hae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was in line with the appliaction of thiamethoxam 37.5 and 25 g a.i. per ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 658–735 · show in text ↑
e1

“Foliar application of thiamethoxam (50 g a.i. per ha) gave highest yield and ICBR ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tested insecticides other than dimethoate were safe for coccinellid beetles in okra.

Treatment
tested insecticide formulationse0
Interactor
coccinellid beetlese0other
Outcome
safe for coccinellid beetlese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All the tested insecticide formulations were found to be safe for coccinellid beetles, except dimethoate 30 EC @ 600 g a.i. / ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–865 · show in text ↑
t0

“okra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dimethoate negatively affected coccinellid beetles relative to high-dose thiamethoxam.

Treatment
dimethoate 30 EC @ 600 g a.i. / hae0
Interactor
coccinellid beetlese0other
Outcome
coccinellid beetlese0
Direction
negative effecte0
Comparator
higher dose of thiamethoxam 25 WG (double dose @ 50 g a.i. ha-1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dimethoate 30 EC @ 600 g a.i. / ha, which have negative effect on coccinellid beetles as recorded in the okra ecosystem in comparison to the higher dose of thiamethoxam 25 WG (double dose @ 50 g a.i. ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No tested insecticide formulation caused phytotoxicity in okra.

Treatment
insecticide formulationse0
Outcome
phytotoxicity effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Abelmoschus esculentus
Abelmoschus esculentus · TaxonKristine Paulus from New York, United States · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“none of the insecticide formulations had phytotoxicity effect in okra ecosystem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1142 · show in text ↑

dimethoate · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

thiamethoxam · Bemisia tabaci · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

thiamethoxam · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 112 positive, 3 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

application · Bemisia tabaci · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

seed treatment · Bemisia tabaci · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

insecticide · pest · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.