Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted to test the efficacy of different dosesof thiamethoxam against okra sucking pests viz., Aphids, Aphis gossypii;leaf hopper, Amrasca biguttela biguttela, and whitefly, Bemisia tabaci andtheir predators in okra agroecosystem. Thiamethoxam 25% WG 25 g a.i./ha(84.71-91.73, 94.12 - 98.11% reduction over control) was highly effectiveagainst aphid, whitefly and leaf hoppers which was on par with 50 g a.i./ha (64.28 - 76.90, 83.70 – 87.92% reduction over control) and 75 g a.i./ha (73.48 - 81.26 and 85.26-92.42% reduction over control) after first andsecond spray, respectively. This was further followed by standard checkthiamethoxam 25% WG @ 25 g a.i./ha (Willoxam®). The plots treated withThiamethoxam 25% WG @ 25, 50 and 75 g a.i. /ha recorded the maximumpopulation of Coccinella spp recorded (4.22-5.10 and 4.33-6.21 nos.) afterfirst and second spray. Thiamethoxam 25% WG @ 75 g a.i./ha treated plotrecorded the maximum yield (8100 kg/ha-1) followed by thiamethoxam25%WG @ 25 and 50 g a.i./ha (7345 and 7690.5 kg/ha-1).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam at 25 g a.i./ha was highly effective in reducing aphid, whitefly and leafhopper populations in okra compared with the control.
- Taxon
- OKRA
.jpg?width=60)
Abelmoschus esculentust0 - Treatment
- Thiamethoxam 25% WG 25 g a.i./hae0
- Interactor
- aphide0pest
- Second interactor
- whiteflye0pest
- Outcome
- reduction over controle0
- Direction
- highly effectivee0
- Value
- 84.71-91.73, 94.12 - 98.11%e0
- Qualifier
- leaf hopperse0
- Comparator
- controle0
- Setting
- FIELDt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Thiamethoxam 25% WG 25 g a.i./ha(84.71-91.73, 94.12 - 98.11% reduction over control) was highly effectiveagainst aphid, whitefly and leaf hoppers which was on par with 50 g a.i./ha (64.28 - 76.90, 83.70 – 87.92% reduction over control) and 75 g a.i./ha (73.48 - 81.26 and 85.26-92.42% reduction over control) after first andsecond spray”
t0“FIELD EVALUATION OF THIAMETHOXAM 25 WG AGAINST SUCKING PESTS IN OKRA”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam at 50 g a.i./ha was on par with 25 g a.i./ha against aphid and whitefly in okra.
- Taxon
- OKRAAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- 50 g a.i./hae0
- Interactor
- aphide0pest
- Second interactor
- whiteflye0pest
- Outcome
- reduction over controle0
- Direction
- on par withe0
- Value
- 64.28 - 76.90, 83.70 – 87.92%e0
- Qualifier
- leaf hopperse0
- Comparator
- 25 g a.i./hae0
- Setting
- FIELDt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Thiamethoxam 25% WG 25 g a.i./ha(84.71-91.73, 94.12 - 98.11% reduction over control) was highly effectiveagainst aphid, whitefly and leaf hoppers which was on par with 50 g a.i./ha (64.28 - 76.90, 83.70 – 87.92% reduction over control) and 75 g a.i./ha (73.48 - 81.26 and 85.26-92.42% reduction over control) after first andsecond spray”
t0“FIELD EVALUATION OF THIAMETHOXAM 25 WG AGAINST SUCKING PESTS IN OKRA”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam at 75 g a.i./ha was on par with 25 g a.i./ha against aphid and whitefly in okra.
- Taxon
- OKRAAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- 75 g a.i./hae0
- Interactor
- aphide0pest
- Second interactor
- whiteflye0pest
- Outcome
- reduction over controle0
- Direction
- on par withe0
- Value
- 73.48 - 81.26 and 85.26-92.42%e0
- Qualifier
- leaf hopperse0
- Comparator
- 25 g a.i./hae0
- Setting
- FIELDt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Thiamethoxam 25% WG 25 g a.i./ha(84.71-91.73, 94.12 - 98.11% reduction over control) was highly effectiveagainst aphid, whitefly and leaf hoppers which was on par with 50 g a.i./ha (64.28 - 76.90, 83.70 – 87.92% reduction over control) and 75 g a.i./ha (73.48 - 81.26 and 85.26-92.42% reduction over control) after first andsecond spray”
t0“FIELD EVALUATION OF THIAMETHOXAM 25 WG AGAINST SUCKING PESTS IN OKRA”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam plots recorded the maximum population of Coccinella spp, a predator, in okra.
- Taxon
- OKRAAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Thiamethoxam 25% WG @ 25, 50 and 75 g a.i. /hae2
- Interactor
- Coccinella spp
Coccinellae2biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- population of Coccinella sppe2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 4.22-5.10 and 4.33-6.21 nos.e2
- Setting
- FIELDt0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e2“The plots treated withThiamethoxam 25% WG @ 25, 50 and 75 g a.i. /ha recorded the maximum population of Coccinella spp recorded (4.22-5.10 and 4.33-6.21 nos.) after first and second spray”
t0“FIELD EVALUATION OF THIAMETHOXAM 25 WG AGAINST SUCKING PESTS IN OKRA”
Claim · model-written summary
Thiamethoxam at 75 g a.i./ha gave the maximum okra yield, above 25 and 50 g a.i./ha.
- Taxon
- OKRAAbelmoschus esculentust0
- Treatment
- Thiamethoxam 25% WG @ 75 g a.i./hae3
- Outcome
- yielde3
- Direction
- maximume3
- Value
- 8100 kg/ha-1e3
- Comparator
- thiamethoxam25%WG @ 25 and 50 g a.i./hae3
- Setting
- FIELDt0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Thiamethoxam 25% WG @ 75 g a.i./ha treated plotrecorded the maximum yield (8100 kg/ha-1) followed by thiamethoxam25%WG @ 25 and 50 g a.i./ha (7345 and 7690.5 kg/ha-1)”
t0“FIELD EVALUATION OF THIAMETHOXAM 25 WG AGAINST SUCKING PESTS IN OKRA”
The same questions in other papers
thiamethoxam · control · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
thiamethoxam · yield · Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.