Abstract
The tests were performed on the property of the Agricultural and Chemical School "Doktor Đorđe Radić" in Kraljevo, on pseudogley soil. A trial involving the triticale cultivar Trijumf was conducted during two growing seasons (2015/16 and 2016/17), to evaluate the effect of different variants of mineral nutrients with lower and higher doses of phosphorus tested, as well as combinations of the same with lime and manure on productive characteristics of winter triticale. The soil on which the experiment was conducted is characterized by a low pH value (pH <5.0). The tests showed a significant variation in the productive characteristics of the tested fertilization variants. The highest 1000-grain mass and test weight in all fertilization variants were in the first vegetation period with moderate temperatures at the time of grain filling and a large amount of precipitation. Applying the combination of mineral nutrients with lime and manure led to a significant increase in 1000-grain mass and test weight of triticale compared to control. The highest average two-year 1000-grain mass and test weight of winter triticale was achieved with variant T5 fertilized with 120 kg/ha N, 100 kg/ha P2O5, 60 kg/ha K2O, with 5 t/ha CaCO3 and 20 t/ha manure (40.52 g; 73.94 kg/hl). An increase in test weight was markedly higher in the treatment involving liming and manure than in that with an increased rate of P fertilizer, mostly due to P immobilization in the highly acid environment. Analysis of variance revealed a highly significant effect of the growing season on the test weight and a highly significant effect of fertilization on 1000-grain mass was determined. In regions where liming is economically acceptable, this operation should be used to grow triticale on very acid soils to increase pH above the suboptimal level (pH 5.0), thereby fulfilling its grain yield potential.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
The highest 1000-grain mass and test weight were in the first vegetation period.
- Taxon
- TRITICALE
×Triticosecalet0 - Outcome
- 1000-grain mass and test weighte1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Setting
- first vegetation periode1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF TRITICALE TO MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZATION AND LIMING ON PSEUDOGLEY SOIL”
e1“The highest 1000-grain mass and test weight in all fertilization variants were in the first vegetation period with moderate temperatures at the time of grain filling and a large amount of precipitation”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined mineral nutrients with lime and manure significantly increased 1000-grain mass and test weight compared with control.
- Taxon
- TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- combination of mineral nutrients with lime and manuree2
- Outcome
- 1000-grain mass and test weighte2
- Direction
- increasee2
- Comparator
- controle2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF TRITICALE TO MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZATION AND LIMING ON PSEUDOGLEY SOIL”
e2“Applying the combination of mineral nutrients with lime and manure led to a significant increase in 1000-grain mass and test weight of triticale compared to control”
Claim · model-written summary
Variant T5 gave the highest two-year average 1000-grain mass of winter triticale, 40.52 g.
- Taxon
- TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- variant T5 fertilized with 120 kg/ha N, 100 kg/ha P2O5, 60 kg/ha K2O, with 5 t/ha CaCO3 and 20 t/ha manuree3
- Outcome
- 1000-grain masse3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 40.52 ge3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF TRITICALE TO MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZATION AND LIMING ON PSEUDOGLEY SOIL”
e3“The highest average two-year 1000-grain mass and test weight of winter triticale was achieved with variant T5 fertilized with 120 kg/ha N, 100 kg/ha P2O5, 60 kg/ha K2O, with 5 t/ha CaCO3 and 20 t/ha manure (40.52 g; 73.94 kg/hl)”
Claim · model-written summary
Variant T5 gave the highest two-year average test weight of winter triticale, 73.94 kg/hl.
- Taxon
- TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- variant T5 fertilized with 120 kg/ha N, 100 kg/ha P2O5, 60 kg/ha K2O, with 5 t/ha CaCO3 and 20 t/ha manuree3
- Outcome
- test weighte3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Value
- 73.94 kg/hle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF TRITICALE TO MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZATION AND LIMING ON PSEUDOGLEY SOIL”
e3“The highest average two-year 1000-grain mass and test weight of winter triticale was achieved with variant T5 fertilized with 120 kg/ha N, 100 kg/ha P2O5, 60 kg/ha K2O, with 5 t/ha CaCO3 and 20 t/ha manure (40.52 g; 73.94 kg/hl)”
Claim · model-written summary
Test weight increased more with liming and manure than with an increased rate of P fertilizer.
- Taxon
- TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- liming and manuree4
- Outcome
- increase in test weighte4
- Direction
- markedly highere4
- Comparator
- an increased rate of P fertilizere4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF TRITICALE TO MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZATION AND LIMING ON PSEUDOGLEY SOIL”
e4“An increase in test weight was markedly higher in the treatment involving liming and manure than in that with an increased rate of P fertilizer”
Claim · model-written summary
The smaller test-weight response to increased P was mostly due to P immobilization in the highly acid environment.
- Taxon
- TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Outcome
- increase in test weighte4
- Qualifier
- P immobilization in the highly acid environmente5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF TRITICALE TO MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZATION AND LIMING ON PSEUDOGLEY SOIL”
e4“An increase in test weight was markedly higher in the treatment involving liming and manure than in that with an increased rate of P fertilizer”
e5“mostly due to P immobilization in the highly acid environment”
Claim · model-written summary
Growing season had a highly significant effect on test weight.
- Taxon
- TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- growing seasone6
- Outcome
- test weighte6
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF TRITICALE TO MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZATION AND LIMING ON PSEUDOGLEY SOIL”
e6“a highly significant effect of the growing season on the test weight”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilization had a highly significant effect on 1000-grain mass.
- Taxon
- TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- fertilizatione7
- Outcome
- 1000-grain masse7
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF TRITICALE TO MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZATION AND LIMING ON PSEUDOGLEY SOIL”
e7“a highly significant effect of fertilization on 1000-grain mass was determined”
Claim · model-written summary
Liming should be used to raise pH above the suboptimal level when growing triticale on very acid soils.
- Taxon
- TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Outcome
- increase pH above the suboptimal levele0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“RESPONSE OF TRITICALE TO MINERAL AND ORGANIC FERTILIZATION AND LIMING ON PSEUDOGLEY SOIL”
e0“In regions where liming is economically acceptable, this operation should be used to grow triticale on very acid soils to increase pH above the suboptimal level”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: grain · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.