Paper · 2025 · Plant Biotechnology Journal

Guava root exudate‐driven rhizosphere microorganisms changes transmitted to foliar‐feeding insects influence their feeding behaviour

Peiwen Zhang; Wei Lu; Lei Yue; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

The growth of different grafted guava was different as affected by grafting on different rootstock varieties, which also influenced the damage degree of Spodoptera litura larvae. The co-regulation of the pest gut by rhizosphere microorganisms and root exudates may contribute to this differential damage. In this study, the microorganisms of soil, plants, S. litura larvae and root exudates of guava grafted on different rootstock varieties were analysed and compared. The activities of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and catalase in the midgut of S. litura larvae feeding on heterograft leaves of guava (where rootstock and scion are of the different variety) were significantly higher than those in the midgut of S. litura larvae feeding on homograft leaves of guava (where rootstock and scion are of the same variety), and glutathione s-transferase activity showed an opposite result. Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia spp. were the two bacterial genera with the greatest difference in abundance in the midgut of S. litura larvae and exhibited a negative correlation with each other. The root system of guava influenced the root structure, soil nutrients and the population structure and diversity of rhizosphere microorganisms by regulating the type and amount of root exudates. Root exudates also influenced the physiological and biochemical status of S. litura larvae by regulating the rhizosphere microorganisms driving the tritrophic interaction of plant-microbes-insects. Based on our results and the observed differences in pest occurrence among different grafted plants, improving varieties through grafting may become an effective strategy to reduce the impact of insect pests on guava.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Larvae feeding on heterograft guava leaves had significantly higher midgut superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and catalase activities than larvae on homograft leaves.

Treatment
heterograft leaves of guavae1
Interactor
S. lituraSpodoptera liturae1pest
Outcome
superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and catalasee1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
homograft leaves of guavae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Guava root exudate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“The activities of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and catalase in the midgut of S. litura larvae feeding on heterograft leaves of guava (where rootstock and scion are of the different variety) were significantly higher than those in the midgut of S. litura larvae feeding on homograft leaves of guava (where rootstock and scion are of the same variety)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–822 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Larvae feeding on heterograft guava leaves had lower midgut glutathione s-transferase activity than larvae on homograft leaves.

Treatment
heterograft leaves of guavae1
Interactor
S. lituraSpodoptera liturae1pest
Outcome
glutathione s-transferase activitye2
Direction
lowerinferrede2
Comparator
homograft leaves of guavae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Guava root exudate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e1

“The activities of superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and catalase in the midgut of S. litura larvae feeding on heterograft leaves of guava (where rootstock and scion are of the different variety) were significantly higher than those in the midgut of S. litura larvae feeding on homograft leaves of guava (where rootstock and scion are of the same variety)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–822 · show in text ↑
e2

“glutathione s-transferase activity showed an opposite result”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–888 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Enterococcus and Escherichia, the two bacterial genera with the greatest abundance difference in larval midgut, were negatively correlated with each other.

Interactor
Enterococcus spp.Enterococcuse3symbiont
Second interactor
Escherichia spp.Escherichiae3symbiont
Outcome
abundancee3
Direction
negative correlatione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterococcus
Enterococcus · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo Credit: Content Providers(s): CDC/Dr. Mike Miller · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Escherichia
Escherichia · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by Eric Erbe, digital colorization by Christopher Pooley, both of USDA, ARS, EMU. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Guava root exudate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e3

“Enterococcus spp. and Escherichia spp. were the two bacterial genera with the greatest difference in abundance in the midgut of S. litura larvae and exhibited a negative correlation with each other”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1087 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The guava root system influenced the population structure and diversity of rhizosphere microorganisms by regulating root exudates.

Organ / stage
root systeme4
Outcome
population structure and diversity of rhizosphere microorganismse4
Qualifier
by regulating the type and amount of root exudatese4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Guava root exudate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e4

“The root system of guava influenced the root structure, soil nutrients and the population structure and diversity of rhizosphere microorganisms by regulating the type and amount of root exudates”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1283 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root exudates appear to influence the physiological and biochemical status of S. litura larvae by regulating rhizosphere microorganisms.

Interactor
S. lituraSpodoptera liturae5pest
Outcome
physiological and biochemical status of S. litura larvaee5
Qualifier
by regulating the rhizosphere microorganismse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Guava root exudate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–18 · show in text ↑
e5

“Root exudates also influenced the physiological and biochemical status of S. litura larvae by regulating the rhizosphere microorganisms driving the tritrophic interaction of plant-microbes-insects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1481 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Improving guava varieties through grafting may reduce the impact of insect pests.

Treatment
graftinge6
Outcome
reduce the impact of insect pestse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“improving varieties through grafting may become an effective strategy to reduce the impact of insect pests on guava”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1584–1699 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting on different rootstock varieties influenced the damage degree caused by Spodoptera litura larvae on guava.

Treatment
grafting on different rootstock varietiese7
Interactor
Spodoptera lituraSpodoptera liturae7pest
Outcome
damage degreee7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Spodoptera litura
Spodoptera litura · InteractorDonald Hobern from Canberra, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The growth of different grafted guava was different as affected by grafting on different rootstock varieties, which also influenced the damage degree of Spodoptera litura larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Guava growth differed between grafted plants on different rootstock varieties.

Treatment
grafting on different rootstock varietiese7
Outcome
growthe7
Direction
differente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Psidium guajava
Psidium guajava · TaxonFuadsyazwan ( talk ) · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The growth of different grafted guava was different as affected by grafting on different rootstock varieties, which also influenced the damage degree of Spodoptera litura larvae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–177 · show in text ↑