Paper · 2025 · Plant Science Today

Impact of planting patterns and weed control treatments on weed dynamics, growth and yield of transplanted rice under unpuddled and puddled conditions

Sasi Chandra Gummadi; US Walia; Singh Ramandeep

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Rice cultivation faces a major biotic challenge from weeds, which compete aggressively with the crop, hampering its growth and yield potential. Puddling operations in transplanted rice helps to supress weeds. However, the physico-chemical properties of soil are deteriorated with this practice. A field study was conducted for two years in Punjab, India during the kharif seasons of 2023 and 2024 to evaluate the weed dynamics, growth and yield of unpuddled transplanted rice under varying planting patterns and weed control treatments. The research was carried out in split plot design comprising of four planting patterns viz. two rows/ridge, two rows/ridge and one in furrow, flat (unpuddled), flat (puddled) in main plots and four weed control treatments, viz. pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as pre-em. fb bispyribac sodium 10 SC at 25 g/ha as post-em., pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as pre-em. fb penoxsulam 240 SC at 24 g ha-1 as post-em., pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as pre-em. fb fenoxaprop 6.7 EC at 67 g ha-1 as post-em. and unweeded (control) in sub-plots, with four replicates. The findings revealed that transplanting two rows per ridge and one in furrow significantly increased the paddy yield, with significant reduction in weed density and biomass in comparison to other planting patterns. Meanwhile, yields from flat unpuddled and flat puddled transplanting were found to be statistically similar. Among weed control treatments, the application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as pre-em. fb bispyribac 10 SC at 25 g ha-1 as post-em. effectively suppressed the population and biomass of weeds including grasses, sedges and broad-leaved weeds, as compared to all other weed control treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two rows per ridge plus one in furrow significantly increased paddy yield versus other patterns.

Treatment
two rows per ridge and one in furrowe0
Outcome
paddy yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
other planting patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“transplanting two rows per ridge and one in furrow significantly increased the paddy yield, with significant reduction in weed density and biomass in comparison to other planting patterns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same pattern significantly reduced weed density and biomass versus other patterns.

Treatment
two rows per ridge and one in furrowe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed density and biomasse0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
other planting patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“transplanting two rows per ridge and one in furrow significantly increased the paddy yield, with significant reduction in weed density and biomass in comparison to other planting patterns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flat unpuddled and flat puddled transplanting produced statistically similar yields.

Treatment
flat unpuddlede0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
flat puddled transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields from flat unpuddled and flat puddled transplanting were found to be statistically similar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1406 · show in text ↑
t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by bispyribac suppressed weed population and biomass more than other weed controls.

Treatment
pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as pre-em. fb bispyribac 10 SC at 25 g ha-1 as post-em.e0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
population and biomass of weedse0
Direction
suppressede0
Comparator
all other weed control treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of pendimethalin 0.75 kg ha-1 as pre-em. fb bispyribac 10 SC at 25 g ha-1 as post-em. effectively suppressed the population and biomass of weeds including grasses, sedges and broad-leaved weeds, as compared to all other weed control treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1438–1698 · show in text ↑
t0

“transplanted rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–111 · show in text ↑

pendimethalin · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

128 papers: 125 positive, 3 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

124 papers more in this group

See all 128 papers →

bispyribac · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

32 papers: 32 positive, 0 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

irrigation · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 25 positive, 7 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 201 in the opposite direction · 64 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.