Paper · 2025 · Irrigation Science

Apple trees’ behavior to a single-season megadrought stress

Joan Girona; Mercè Mata; Jesús del Campo; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Extreme weather events such as megadroughts (long duration and intense droughts) are becoming common in regions with Mediterranean climates and threaten the continuity of fruit production. In this context, this study assesses the effects of a single-season megadrought on the physiological response and mortality of mature apple trees in a high-density orchard. Two treatments were imposed in two weighing lysimeters with four trees in each one, (i) Control: fully irrigated according to the crop evapotranspiration; and (ii) Drought: rainfed from 7 May 2023, until the end of the season. Trees’ evapotranspiration and trunk water potential were continuously monitored during the experiment in combination with periodic measurements of the soil water content, stomatal conductance, midday stem water potential, and apple size. The trunk water potential of apple trees in the drought lysimeter during the 2023 season fell below − 4.5 MPa, with stomatal conductance decreasing from 0.4 mmol m − 2 s − 1 before withholding irrigation to 0 mmol m − 2 s − 1 60 days later. In the following spring 2024, the four apple trees subjected to the megadrought were agronomically dead (did not sprout). Our results showed that, for apple trees, a threshold value of water potential of -3.5 MPa must not be surpassed to ensure the tree survival, while values below − 4.0 MPa for 27 days cause the death of the trees.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple trunk water potential under drought fell below − 4.5 MPa.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Treatment
Drought: rainfed from 7 May 2023, until the end of the seasone1
Outcome
trunk water potentiale0
Direction
fell belowe0
Value
− 4.5 MPae0
Comparator
Control: fully irrigated according to the crop evapotranspiratione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The trunk water potential of apple trees in the drought lysimeter during the 2023 season fell below − 4.5 MPa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–945 · show in text ↑
e1

“Control: fully irrigated according to the crop evapotranspiration; and (ii) Drought: rainfed from 7 May 2023, until the end of the season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–596 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple stomatal conductance dropped from 0.4 to 0 after irrigation was withheld.

Taxon
Apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
withholding irrigatione0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
decreasinge0
Value
0 mmol m − 2 s − 1e0
Qualifier
0.4 mmol m − 2 s − 1e0
Comparator
before withholding irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stomatal conductance decreasing from 0.4 mmol m − 2 s − 1 before withholding irrigation to 0 mmol m − 2 s − 1 60 days later”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 952–1075 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All four megadrought-exposed apple trees failed to sprout in spring 2024.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Treatment
megadroughte0
Outcome
agronomically dead (did not sprout)e0
Value
foure0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the following spring 2024, the four apple trees subjected to the megadrought were agronomically dead (did not sprout)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1197 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors set a water potential survival threshold of -3.5 MPa for apple trees.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticae0
Outcome
threshold value of water potentiale0
Value
-3.5 MPae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“for apple trees, a threshold value of water potential of -3.5 MPa must not be surpassed to ensure the tree survival”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1339 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water potential below − 4.0 MPa for 27 days caused apple tree death.

Taxon
Apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
values below − 4.0 MPa for 27 dayse0
Outcome
death of the treese0
Value
− 4.0 MPae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“values below − 4.0 MPa for 27 days cause the death of the trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–11 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: water · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

17 papers: 5 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · physiology: gas exchange · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.