Paper · 2025 · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry

Drought stress disrupts biological nitrogen fixation and starch accumulation compromising growth and yield of cowpea plants

Andressa Aparecida Rodrigues Melo; Maycon Anderson Araújo; Nandhara Angélica Carvalho Mendes; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Water scarcity is one of the most important abiotic stresses in biological nitrogen fixation, often limiting the yield of leguminous plants. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of soil moisture on biological nitrogen fixation, cellular osmotic adjustment and cowpea yield. Water restriction started 20 days after sowing with different levels (20, 40, 60, and 80 %) of soil water retention capacity (SWRC). Cowpea plants did not complete life cycle under 20 % SWRC. Plants growing under SWRC less than 60 % decreased stomatal conductance, transpiration, photosynthetic rates and leaf pigments such as chlorophyll and carotenoids. Drought stress caused chlorosis in leaf tissues, reducing sucrose and total sugars in shoots and transport of these metabolites to the roots. Drought stress disrupted number and weight of nodule per plants affecting nitrogen compounds (ureides, nitrate, ammonia and amino acids) accumulation in roots and shoots of cowpea plants. Well-watered plants showed better biological nitrogen fixation, photosynthetic rates and starch accumulation in the leaves. Less stomatal conductance and transpiration rates induced by drought impaired nodulation, biological nitrogen fixation, dry mass of roots and shoots, growth and yield of cowpea plants. These results suggest that stomatal conductance, transpiration rates and nodulation were the main physiological responses limiting growth and yield of cowpea plants grown in soil moisture below than 60 % SWRC.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea did not finish its life cycle at 20% SWRC.

Taxon
cowpea plantsVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
20 % SWRCe0
Outcome
did not complete life cyclee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea plants did not complete life cycle under 20 % SWRC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Below 60% SWRC, stomatal conductance, transpiration and photosynthetic rates declined.

Taxon
cowpea plantsVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
SWRC less than 60 %e0
Outcome
stomatal conductance, transpiration, photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants growing under SWRC less than 60 % decreased stomatal conductance, transpiration, photosynthetic rates and leaf pigments such as chlorophyll and carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Below 60% SWRC, chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments declined.

Taxon
cowpea plantsVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
SWRC less than 60 %e0
Outcome
leaf pigments such as chlorophyll and carotenoidse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plants growing under SWRC less than 60 % decreased stomatal conductance, transpiration, photosynthetic rates and leaf pigments such as chlorophyll and carotenoids.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought caused leaf chlorosis.

Taxon
cowpea plantsVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
chlorosis in leaf tissuese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress caused chlorosis in leaf tissues”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced shoot sucrose and total sugars.

Taxon
cowpea plantsVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
sucrose and total sugars in shootse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress caused chlorosis in leaf tissues, reducing sucrose and total sugars in shoots and transport of these metabolites to the roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought reduced transport of sugars to roots.

Taxon
cowpea plantsVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
transport of these metabolites to the rootse0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress caused chlorosis in leaf tissues, reducing sucrose and total sugars in shoots and transport of these metabolites to the roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–774 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought disrupted nodule number and weight.

Taxon
cowpea plantsVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
number and weight of nodule per plantse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress disrupted number and weight of nodule per plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–838 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought affected root and shoot nitrogen compound accumulation.

Taxon
cowpea plantsVigna unguiculatat0
Treatment
Drought stresse0
Outcome
nitrogen compounds (ureides, nitrate, ammonia and amino acids) accumulation in roots and shootse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought stress disrupted number and weight of nodule per plants affecting nitrogen compounds (ureides, nitrate, ammonia and amino acids) accumulation in roots and shoots of cowpea plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–962 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Well watered plants had better nitrogen fixation and photosynthetic rates.

Taxon
cowpea plantsVigna unguiculatat0
Outcome
biological nitrogen fixation, photosynthetic ratese0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Well-watered plants showed better biological nitrogen fixation, photosynthetic rates and starch accumulation in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Well watered plants had better leaf starch accumulation.

Taxon
cowpea plantsVigna unguiculatat0
Outcome
starch accumulation in the leavese0
Direction
bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Well-watered plants showed better biological nitrogen fixation, photosynthetic rates and starch accumulation in the leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought induced lower conductance and transpiration impaired nodulation and fixation.

Taxon
cowpea plantsVigna unguiculatat0
Outcome
nodulation, biological nitrogen fixatione0
Direction
impairede0
Qualifier
Less stomatal conductance and transpiration rates induced by droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Less stomatal conductance and transpiration rates induced by drought impaired nodulation, biological nitrogen fixation, dry mass of roots and shoots, growth and yield of cowpea plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought induced lower conductance and transpiration impaired root and shoot dry mass, growth and yield.

Taxon
cowpea plantsVigna unguiculatat0
Outcome
dry mass of roots and shoots, growth and yielde0
Direction
impairede0
Qualifier
Less stomatal conductance and transpiration rates induced by droughte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Less stomatal conductance and transpiration rates induced by drought impaired nodulation, biological nitrogen fixation, dry mass of roots and shoots, growth and yield of cowpea plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors identify conductance, transpiration and nodulation as main limits on growth and yield below 60% SWRC.

Taxon
cowpea plantsVigna unguiculatat0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
limitinge0
Qualifier
stomatal conductance, transpiration rates and nodulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stomatal conductance, transpiration rates and nodulation were the main physiological responses limiting growth and yield of cowpea plants grown in soil moisture below than 60 % SWRC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“cowpea plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–123 · show in text ↑

drought · molecular: metabolites · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

soil water · physiology: pigments · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

soil water · physiology: photosynthesis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

drought · nutrient: content · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

drought · symbiosis · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · quality: sugar starch · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.