Paper · 2025 · Tikrit Journal for Agricultural Sciences

Effect of soil amendments and irrigation levels on Growth Characteristics and Yield of Wheat and Barley

Mohammed D.Y. El-Jubouri; Mohammed Al-Dharob; Saadi Sattar Shahadha; et al.

10
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In light of the water scarcity for most Iraqi agricultural areas, especially after the decline in the water level of the Tigris and Euphrates rivers to nearly a third. Solutions become necessary to improve water-crop productivity and achieve the sustainable cultivation of strategic crops through using soil amendments, which reduces the soil water loss. Therefore, this research was conducted at, Al-Raeeid Research Station, Baghdad, Iraq, to study the effect of adding compost fertilizer (7500 kg ha-¹) and perlite (250 kg ha-¹) to wheat and barley crops that were irrigated with two irrigation levels (when exhausting 30% and 50% of the available soil water). The results showed that wheat growth and productivity decreased with increasing water stress of 50%, while opposite results were obtained from the barley crop. The wheat crop showed more sensitivity to the 50% level, but this level did not appear stressful for the barley crop. Also, adding compost and perlite improved wheat growth and yield indicators, which showed a greater response to compost, while barley responded to perlite more than to compost. This study concluded that the combination of compost and irrigation level of 30% presented the highest water-wheat productivity. In comparison, the combination of perlite and irrigation level of 50% presented the highest water-barley productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat growth and productivity decreased under 50% water stress.

Treatment
water stress of 50%e0
Outcome
growth and productivitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat growth and productivity decreased with increasing water stress of 50%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 687–762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley showed the opposite growth and productivity response to 50% water stress.

Treatment
water stress of 50%e0
Outcome
opposite resultse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water stress of 50%, while opposite results were obtained from the barley crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–821 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat was more sensitive to the 50% irrigation level.

Outcome
sensitivitye0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
50% levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wheat crop showed more sensitivity to the 50% level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–878 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 50% irrigation level did not appear stressful for barley.

Outcome
did not appear stressfule0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this level did not appear stressful for the barley crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–939 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost improved wheat growth and yield indicators.

Treatment
composte0
Outcome
growth and yield indicatorse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adding compost and perlite improved wheat growth and yield indicators, which showed a greater response to compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1060 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perlite improved wheat growth and yield indicators.

Treatment
perlitee0
Outcome
growth and yield indicatorse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adding compost and perlite improved wheat growth and yield indicators”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1016 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat responded more to compost than perlite.

Outcome
growth and yield indicatorse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
composte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat growth and yield indicators, which showed a greater response to compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1060 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Barley responded more to perlite than compost.

Treatment
perlitee0
Outcome
respondede0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
composte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley responded to perlite more than to compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1068–1116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost with 30% irrigation gave the highest water productivity for wheat.

Treatment
combination of compost and irrigation level of 30%e0
Outcome
water-wheat productivitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of compost and irrigation level of 30% presented the highest water-wheat productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1245 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Perlite with 50% irrigation gave the highest water productivity for barley.

Treatment
combination of perlite and irrigation level of 50%e0
Outcome
water-barley productivitye0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination of perlite and irrigation level of 50% presented the highest water-barley productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1364 · show in text ↑

growing medium · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 15 positive, 4 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.