Paper · 2025 · Bionatura journal :

Critical Weed Interference Periods in Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): Yield Loss, Dominant Species, and Management Implications in Andean Agroecosystems

Jorge Merino; Alberto Pedreros; Susana Fischer; et al.

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Weed competition is a major biotic constraint in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivation, yet the timing and extent of its impact on yield remain poorly understood. This study quantified the effects of weed interference on quinoa yield and identified dominant weed species across two consecutive growing seasons in the Andean region. We evaluated eight weed management treatments (0 to 105 days after emergence, DAE) using a randomized complete block design. Dicotyledonous species dominated the weed community, including Amaranthus hybridus, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Chenopodium album, and the monocot Echinochloa crus-galli. Weed competition caused a drastic 90% yield reduction, plummeting from 1,352.36 kg ha⁻¹ (weed-free) to 11.55 kg ha⁻¹ when weeds remained until crop maturity. We observed critical yield losses when weeds competed beyond 30 DAE, highlighting the importance of early weed control. We also found significant negative correlations between weed biomass and quinoa growth parameters (plant biomass and grain number; P < 0.05). Echinochloa crus-galli and Polygonum aviculare emerged as key competitors, their dominance shifting with seasonal climatic variations. These findings provide the first empirical basis for integrated weed management in Andean quinoa systems, emphasizing targeted control during early phenological stages to mitigate yield losses. This study advances agroecological strategies for sustainable quinoa production in weed-prone environments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dicotyledonous species dominated the weed community.

Outcome
Dicotyledonous species dominated the weed communitye0
Setting
Andean regione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dicotyledonous species dominated the weed community, including Amaranthus hybridus, Ambrosia artemisiifolia, Chenopodium album, and the monocot Echinochloa crus-galli.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–633 · show in text ↑
e1

“quinoa yield and identified dominant weed species across two consecutive growing seasons in the Andean region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–340 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed competition reduced quinoa yield by 90% relative to weed-free cultivation.

Treatment
weeds remained until crop maturitye0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductione0
Value
90%e0
Qualifier
11.55 kg ha⁻¹e0
Comparator
weed-freee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed competition caused a drastic 90% yield reduction, plummeting from 1,352.36 kg ha⁻¹ (weed-free) to 11.55 kg ha⁻¹ when weeds remained until crop maturity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–791 · show in text ↑
e1

“quinoa yield and identified dominant weed species across two consecutive growing seasons in the Andean region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–340 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield losses became critical when weeds competed beyond 30 days after emergence.

Treatment
weeds competed beyond 30 DAEe0
Outcome
yield lossese0
Direction
lossese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“critical yield losses when weeds competed beyond 30 DAE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–859 · show in text ↑
e1

“quinoa yield and identified dominant weed species across two consecutive growing seasons in the Andean region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–340 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed biomass was negatively correlated with quinoa plant biomass and grain number.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
plant biomass and grain numbere0
Direction
negativee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant negative correlations between weed biomass and quinoa growth parameters (plant biomass and grain number; P < 0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1052 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Echinochloa crus-galli and Polygonum aviculare were key competitors with seasonally shifting dominance.

Interactor
Echinochloa crus-galliEchinochloa crus-gallie0weed
Second interactor
Polygonum avicularePolygonum avicularee0weed
Outcome
key competitorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Echinochloa crus-galli
Echinochloa crus-galli · InteractorMichael Becker · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Polygonum aviculare
Polygonum aviculare · Second interactorDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Echinochloa crus-galli and Polygonum aviculare emerged as key competitors, their dominance shifting with seasonal climatic variations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“quinoa yield and identified dominant weed species across two consecutive growing seasons in the Andean region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–340 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend targeted early weed control to reduce quinoa yield losses.

Outcome
targeted control during early phenological stagese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chenopodium quinoa
Chenopodium quinoa · TaxonKurt Stueber · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“emphasizing targeted control during early phenological stages to mitigate yield losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1381 · show in text ↑
e1

“quinoa yield and identified dominant weed species across two consecutive growing seasons in the Andean region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 230–340 · show in text ↑

stage · yield · Chenopodium quinoa (quinoa)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.