Abstract
Triticale (Triticosecale Wittmack) are a hybrid created by man by crossing two species, namely Triticum aestivum and Secale cereale. They adopted the good ability to adapt to climatic conditions, high resistance to plant diseases and the utilization of low fertility soils from Secale cereale and the high production capacity and high protein content from Triticum aestivum. In general, triticale is used in feeding animals in different forms (concentrated fodder, straw, silage, pasture), especially in feeding pigs and birds. More recently, it was discovered that this plant has several properties, being similar to wheat. It is also used in the bioethanol, alcohol, cellulose industry and even in aquaculture. Fertilization is one of the most important in the cultivation technology of this plant, ensuring production increases both quantitatively and qualitatively. The experiment is located in the year 2021-2022, in northwest Romania, in Livada, Satu Mare county on a typical preluvosol with an acidic reaction, with a pH of 5.19 in the arable layer. It is placed after the method of subdivided plots, being an experiment with three experimental factors, of which only two factors were studied, the variety and fertilization and their influence on triticale production. Due to the severe climatic conditions, with high temperatures and lack of precipitation, additional fertilization with foliar fertilizer and biostimulator recorded significantly negative differences in production. It was found that the best fertilization option during that testing period was the basic fertilization of the soil with complex fertilizers in the fall and nitrogen-based fertilizers in the springtime.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Additional foliar fertilizer significantly reduced triticale production under hot, dry conditions.
- Taxon
- TRITICALE
×Triticosecalet0 - Treatment
- foliar fertilizere0
- Outcome
- productione0
- Direction
- negative differencese0
- Qualifier
- high temperatures and lack of precipitatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Due to the severe climatic conditions, with high temperatures and lack of precipitation, additional fertilization with foliar fertilizer and biostimulator recorded significantly negative differences in production.”
t0“TRITICALE”
Claim · model-written summary
Additional biostimulator significantly reduced triticale production under hot, dry conditions.
- Taxon
- TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- biostimulatore0
- Outcome
- productione0
- Direction
- negative differencese0
- Qualifier
- high temperatures and lack of precipitatione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Due to the severe climatic conditions, with high temperatures and lack of precipitation, additional fertilization with foliar fertilizer and biostimulator recorded significantly negative differences in production.”
t0“TRITICALE”
Claim · model-written summary
Basic fall complex fertilizer and spring nitrogen fertilizer was the best option in the test period.
- Taxon
- TRITICALE×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- basic fertilization of the soil with complex fertilizers in the fall and nitrogen-based fertilizers in the springtimee0
- Outcome
- best fertilization optione0
- Qualifier
- during that testing periode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best fertilization option during that testing period was the basic fertilization of the soil with complex fertilizers in the fall and nitrogen-based fertilizers in the springtime.”
t0“TRITICALE”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
94 papers more in this group
See all 98 papers →application · yield · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.