Paper · 2025 · Agriculture

Impact of High Nitrogen Doses and Living Mulch on Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of Young Apple Trees (cv. ‘Sampion’)

Maria Licznar-Małańczuk

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The experiment aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of using high doses of nitrogen (N) and delaying the sowing of living mulch in the apple tree (Malus domestica Borkh.) orchard as factors stimulating tree growth and influencing fruit quality. Blue fescue (Festuca ovina L.), as a cover crop, was sown in the tree rows in the second and fourth year after tree planting. It was compared to herbicide fallow control treatment. In each floor management, four N doses (50, 80, 110, and 140 kg ha−1) were used every year. The study indicated the dominance of living mulch, especially sowing in the second year after tree planting as a factor influencing the reduction in growth and yield but improving the red blush surface on the fruit skin. The growth of trees was also strongly influenced by biotic and abiotic stress factors, which did not allow for a clear assessment of N fertilization. With objectively low cropping levels and poor growth of all trees tested in the experiment, their N needs were satisfied by a dose of 50 kg ha−1. The application of the highest dose of 140 kg N ha−1 had a significant and negative impact on the red color of the fruit skin.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Living mulch sown in the second year after planting reduced growth and yield of young apple trees compared with herbicide fallow.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
living mulche1
Outcome
growth and yielde1
Direction
reductione1
Comparator
herbicide fallow control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the apple tree (Malus domestica Borkh.) orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“The study indicated the dominance of living mulch, especially sowing in the second year after tree planting as a factor influencing the reduction in growth and yield but improving the red blush surface on the fruit skin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–736 · show in text ↑
e2

“It was compared to herbicide fallow control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Living mulch sown in the second year after planting improved red blush surface on apple fruit skin compared with herbicide fallow.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
living mulche1
Outcome
red blush surface on the fruit skine1
Direction
improvinge1
Comparator
herbicide fallow control treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the apple tree (Malus domestica Borkh.) orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–177 · show in text ↑
e1

“The study indicated the dominance of living mulch, especially sowing in the second year after tree planting as a factor influencing the reduction in growth and yield but improving the red blush surface on the fruit skin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–736 · show in text ↑
e2

“It was compared to herbicide fallow control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–424 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest nitrogen dose of 140 kg N ha−1 significantly reduced red colour of apple fruit skin.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
the highest dose of 140 kg N ha−1e3
Outcome
red color of the fruit skine3
Direction
negative impacte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the apple tree (Malus domestica Borkh.) orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–177 · show in text ↑
e3

“The application of the highest dose of 140 kg N ha−1 had a significant and negative impact on the red color of the fruit skin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1159 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen needs of the young apple trees were satisfied by 50 kg ha−1.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
a dose of 50 kg ha−1e4
Outcome
N needse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the apple tree (Malus domestica Borkh.) orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–177 · show in text ↑
e4

“With objectively low cropping levels and poor growth of all trees tested in the experiment, their N needs were satisfied by a dose of 50 kg ha−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–1032 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree growth was strongly influenced by biotic and abiotic stress factors, which limited the assessment of nitrogen fertilization.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
biotic and abiotic stress factorse5
Outcome
growth of treese5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in the apple tree (Malus domestica Borkh.) orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 127–177 · show in text ↑
e5

“The growth of trees was also strongly influenced by biotic and abiotic stress factors, which did not allow for a clear assessment of N fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 738–886 · show in text ↑

cover crop · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

9 papers: 3 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

nitrogen · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 5 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.