Paper · 2001 · European Journal of Horticultural Science

Effects of doubled atmospheric CO 2 concentration on apple trees I. Growth analysis

K. Chen; G. Q. Hu; F. Lenz

15
claims
34
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Summary Two year old apple ( Malus domestica Borkh. cv. 'Golden Delicious') trees on 'M9' were exposed to ambient (350 ± 10 ppm) and doubled (700 ± 10 ppm) atmospheric CO 2 for 120 d in growth chambers situated in an apple orchard. Doubled CO 2 promoted tree growth, indicated by more leaves and shoots, a larger average leaf area, and total leaf dry weight per tree, as well as a wider canopy and trunk diameter. Average shoot length and diameter, shoot length per tree, tree height, and total leaf area increased, whereas specific leaf area and leaf area ratio of the trees decreased at 700 ppm CO 2 . When compared to trees grown under 350 ppm CO 2 , 700 ppm CO 2 -treated trees stimulated the mean daily growth rate of total leaf area by 73-130%, total shoot length by 161-162%, and plant dry mass by 134-158%, respectively. Impacts of long-term atmospheric CO 2 enrichment on dry weight ratio in different components of the trees were more prominent in above-ground organs than in roots. High CO 2 raised leaf and shoot dry weight ratio, but reduced stem dry weight ratio, whereas root dry weight ratio and root/shoot ratio of the trees were not affected throughout the experiment. On average, net assimilation rate and relative growth rate were 0.6-1.7 g m -2 d -1 and 1.2-3.9 g kg -1 d -1 higher in trees grown at 700 than in those at 350 ppm CO 2 , but tended to decline with the duration of CO 2 treatment. The physiological and morphological mechanisms for the increased apple tree growth and plant development by the doubled atmospheric CO 2 concentration were associated with net assimilation rate and relative growth rate of the plants as well as cell differentiation and elongation of the plant organs. The adjustment of plant growth under long-term atmospheric CO 2 enrichment resulted from the plant adaptation to high CO 2 conditions, which was affected by carbon sink/source availability and strength.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubled CO 2 increased leaf and shoot numbers, average leaf area, leaf dry weight, canopy width, and trunk diameter.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
Doubled CO 2e0
Outcome
more leaves and shoots, a larger average leaf area, and total leaf dry weight per treee0
Direction
moree0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Doubled CO 2 promoted tree growth, indicated by more leaves and shoots, a larger average leaf area, and total leaf dry weight per tree, as well as a wider canopy and trunk diameter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 700 ppm CO 2, average shoot length and diameter, shoot length per tree, tree height, and total leaf area increased.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
700 ppm CO 2e0
Outcome
Average shoot length and diameter, shoot length per tree, tree height, and total leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Average shoot length and diameter, shoot length per tree, tree height, and total leaf area increased, whereas specific leaf area and leaf area ratio of the trees decreased at 700 ppm CO 2 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 414–603 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Specific leaf area and leaf area ratio decreased at 700 ppm CO 2.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
700 ppm CO 2e0
Outcome
specific leaf area and leaf area ratioe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“specific leaf area and leaf area ratio of the trees decreased at 700 ppm CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–601 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total leaf area daily growth rate increased by 73-130% at 700 ppm compared with 350 ppm CO 2.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
700 ppm CO 2e0
Outcome
mean daily growth rate of total leaf areae0
Direction
stimulatede0
Value
73-130%e0
Comparator
350 ppm CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When compared to trees grown under 350 ppm CO 2 , 700 ppm CO 2 -treated trees stimulated the mean daily growth rate of total leaf area by 73-130%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–749 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total shoot length daily growth rate increased by 161-162% at 700 ppm CO 2.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
700 ppm CO 2e1
Outcome
total shoot lengthe0
Direction
stimulatede1
Value
161-162%e0
Comparator
350 ppm CO 2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total shoot length by 161-162%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–781 · show in text ↑
e1

“When compared to trees grown under 350 ppm CO 2 , 700 ppm CO 2 -treated trees stimulated the mean daily growth rate of total leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant dry mass daily growth rate increased by 134-158% at 700 ppm CO 2.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
700 ppm CO 2e1
Outcome
plant dry masse0
Direction
stimulatede1
Value
134-158%e0
Comparator
350 ppm CO 2e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant dry mass by 134-158%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–813 · show in text ↑
e1

“When compared to trees grown under 350 ppm CO 2 , 700 ppm CO 2 -treated trees stimulated the mean daily growth rate of total leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO 2 had more prominent dry weight ratio effects in above-ground organs than roots.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Organ / stage
above-ground organse0
Treatment
long-term atmospheric CO 2 enrichmente0
Outcome
dry weight ratio in different components of the treese0
Direction
more prominente0
Comparator
rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Impacts of long-term atmospheric CO 2 enrichment on dry weight ratio in different components of the trees were more prominent in above-ground organs than in roots.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO 2 increased leaf and shoot dry weight ratios.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
High CO 2e0
Outcome
leaf and shoot dry weight ratioe0
Direction
raisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“High CO 2 raised leaf and shoot dry weight ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO 2 reduced stem dry weight ratio.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
High CO 2e1
Outcome
stem dry weight ratioe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but reduced stem dry weight ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1076 · show in text ↑
e1

“High CO 2 raised leaf and shoot dry weight ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root dry weight and root/shoot ratios were unaffected.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
High CO 2e1
Outcome
root dry weight ratio and root/shoot ratioe0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“root dry weight ratio and root/shoot ratio of the trees were not affected throughout the experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1186 · show in text ↑
e1

“High CO 2 raised leaf and shoot dry weight ratio”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net assimilation rate was 0.6-1.7 g m -2 d -1 higher at 700 than 350 ppm CO 2.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
700e0
Outcome
net assimilation ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.6-1.7 g m -2 d -1e0
Comparator
350 ppm CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net assimilation rate and relative growth rate were 0.6-1.7 g m -2 d -1 and 1.2-3.9 g kg -1 d -1 higher in trees grown at 700 than in those at 350 ppm CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative growth rate was 1.2-3.9 g kg -1 d -1 higher at 700 than 350 ppm CO 2.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
700e0
Outcome
relative growth ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.2-3.9 g kg -1 d -1e0
Comparator
350 ppm CO 2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net assimilation rate and relative growth rate were 0.6-1.7 g m -2 d -1 and 1.2-3.9 g kg -1 d -1 higher in trees grown at 700 than in those at 350 ppm CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1199–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net assimilation and relative growth rates tended to decline with treatment duration.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
CO 2 treatmente0
Outcome
net assimilation rate and relative growth ratee1
Direction
declinee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but tended to decline with the duration of CO 2 treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1415 · show in text ↑
e1

“On average, net assimilation rate and relative growth rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1245 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors associated elevated CO 2 growth response with assimilation and growth rates and cell differentiation and elongation.

Taxon
apple treeMalus domesticae0
Treatment
doubled atmospheric CO 2 concentratione0
Outcome
increased apple tree growth and plant developmente0
Qualifier
net assimilation rate and relative growth rate of the plants as well as cell differentiation and elongation of the plant organse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The physiological and morphological mechanisms for the increased apple tree growth and plant development by the doubled atmospheric CO 2 concentration were associated with net assimilation rate and relative growth rate of the plants as well as cell differentiation and elongation of the plant organs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1716 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors attributed long-term growth adjustment to adaptation affected by sink/source availability and strength.

Taxon
apple treesMalus domesticat0
Treatment
long-term atmospheric CO 2 enrichmente0
Outcome
adjustment of plant growthe0
Qualifier
carbon sink/source availability and strengthe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The adjustment of plant growth under long-term atmospheric CO 2 enrichment resulted from the plant adaptation to high CO 2 conditions, which was affected by carbon sink/source availability and strength.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1717–1919 · show in text ↑
t0

“apple trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–64 · show in text ↑

co2 · growth · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.