Paper · 2025 · Resources Environment and Sustainability

Combatting environmental impacts and microbiological pollution risks in Potato cropping: Benefits of forage cultivation in a semi-arid region

Xudong Sun; Yousif Abdelrahman Yousif Abdellah; Guangyan Wang; et al.

12
claims
12
verbatim quotes
3
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Continuous potato cropping in semi-arid regions, which are vulnerable to erosion, reduces tuber yields and leads to a decline in soil quality. This research delves into the impact of forage cultivation on soil bacterial and archaeal communities and the associated hazard-related virulence genes and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) within potato cropping systems. The study reveals that distinct crop rotation schemes significantly alter soil physicochemical properties. Compared to non-potato cultivation, continuous potato cropping substantially reduces soil organic carbon from 31.9 g kg − 1 to 15.7 g kg − 1 and total nitrogen from 3.7 g kg − 1 to 1.6 g kg − 1 , indicating a notable deterioration in soil fertility. Among the ten identified phyla, Proteobacteria demonstrates the highest relative abundance, from 34.6% to 38.4%, closely followed by Actinobacteria, ranging from 20.5% to 36.0%. These two phyla likely play a crucial role in maintaining soil health. Moreover, continuous potato cultivation (CPC) results in more specific ARGs than non-potato cultivation (NPC). This phenomenon implies that CPC may select for particular resistance traits within the soil microbiome, potentially due to changes in the composition of the soil microbiota. Forage crops (oats or a mixture of oats and peas) exhibit varying effects on ARGs at different growth stages. The differences observed between the flowering and maturity stages of oats suggest that plant growth and the composition of root exudates can influence microbial communities and the prevalence of ARGs. The Mantel test further indicates that specific soil properties impact the abundance of certain microbial taxa and determine the expression of key functional genes, including those associated with antibiotic resistance. These findings underscore the intricate interactions among microbial communities, genes, and soil health, providing essential guidance for formulating agricultural practices to manage soil health and mitigating problems such as antibiotic resistance in continuously cropped soils. Importantly, this study highlights the significant benefits of crop diversification, primarily through the incorporation of forage crops, in safeguarding soil health and maintaining microbial diversity within potato cropping systems. The results offer valuable perspectives for developing sustainable agricultural strategies, which can enhance soil fertility and promote ecosystem stability in semi-arid regions. • Continuous potato cropping decreases soil fertility with reduced SOC and TN. • Oat cultivation enhances mineral nitrogen availability and soil properties. • Forage cultivation alters the structure of soil archaeal communities. • 20 abundant antibiotic-resistance genes significantly vary across cultivations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop rotation schemes significantly altered soil physicochemical properties.

Treatment
crop rotation schemese0
Outcome
soil physicochemical propertiese0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“distinct crop rotation schemes significantly alter soil physicochemical properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 389–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous potato cropping reduced soil organic carbon from 31.9 to 15.7 g kg − 1 versus non-potato cultivation.

Treatment
continuous potato croppinge0
Outcome
soil organic carbone0
Direction
reducese0
Value
15.7 g kg − 1e0
Qualifier
31.9 g kg − 1e0
Comparator
non-potato cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared to non-potato cultivation, continuous potato cropping substantially reduces soil organic carbon from 31.9 g kg − 1 to 15.7 g kg − 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–613 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous potato cropping reduced soil total nitrogen from 3.7 to 1.6 g kg − 1.

Treatment
continuous potato croppinge0
Outcome
total nitrogene0
Direction
reducese0
Value
1.6 g kg − 1e0
Qualifier
3.7 g kg − 1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous potato cropping substantially reduces soil organic carbon from 31.9 g kg − 1 to 15.7 g kg − 1 and total nitrogen from 3.7 g kg − 1 to 1.6 g kg − 1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 509–666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteobacteria had the highest relative abundance, 34.6% to 38.4%.

Outcome
Proteobacteria demonstrates the highest relative abundancee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
34.6% to 38.4%e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Proteobacteria demonstrates the highest relative abundance, from 34.6% to 38.4%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–834 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinobacteria abundance ranged from 20.5% to 36.0%.

Outcome
Actinobacteriae0
Value
20.5% to 36.0%e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Actinobacteria, ranging from 20.5% to 36.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous potato cropping had more specific antibiotic resistance genes than non-potato cultivation.

Treatment
continuous potato cultivation (CPC)e0
Outcome
specific ARGse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
non-potato cultivation (NPC)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“continuous potato cultivation (CPC) results in more specific ARGs than non-potato cultivation (NPC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1081 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat or oat-pea forage crops had varying effects on antibiotic resistance genes by growth stage.

Organ / stage
different growth stagese0
Treatment
oats or a mixture of oats and pease0
Outcome
ARGse0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Forage crops (oats or a mixture of oats and peas) exhibit varying effects on ARGs at different growth stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1366 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil properties were associated with abundance of certain microbial taxa.

Outcome
abundance of certain microbial taxae0
Qualifier
specific soil propertiese0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“specific soil properties impact the abundance of certain microbial taxa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1680 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil properties were associated with expression of functional genes including antibiotic resistance genes.

Outcome
expression of key functional genese0
Qualifier
specific soil propertiese0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“specific soil properties impact the abundance of certain microbial taxa and determine the expression of key functional genes, including those associated with antibiotic resistance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1788 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oat cultivation enhanced mineral nitrogen availability and soil properties.

Treatment
Oat cultivatione0
Outcome
mineral nitrogen availability and soil propertiese0
Direction
enhancese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Oat cultivation enhances mineral nitrogen availability and soil properties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2565–2640 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage cultivation altered soil archaeal community structure.

Treatment
Forage cultivatione0
Outcome
structure of soil archaeal communitiese0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Forage cultivation alters the structure of soil archaeal communities.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2643–2712 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Twenty abundant antibiotic resistance genes varied significantly across cultivation systems.

Outcome
antibiotic-resistance genese0
Value
20e0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“20 abundant antibiotic-resistance genes significantly vary across cultivations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2715–2794 · show in text ↑

rotation · soil: chemistry · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

rotation · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.