Paper · 2015 · Agronomy Journal

Improving Productivity of Managed Potato Cropping Systems in Eastern Canada: Crop Rotation and Nitrogen Source Effects

Judith Nyiraneza; Rick D. Peters; Vernon A. Rodd; et al.

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
32
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Strategies to improve sustainability are important in intensively managed potato ( Solanum tuberosum L.) systems. This study has assessed rotation systems and N sources to mitigate potato yield and soil organic matter decline in Prince Edward Island (PEI), Canada. Three‐year potato rotation systems were initiated in 2006: continuous potato (CP); potato–barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) underseeded with red clover ( Trifolium pratense L.)–red clover (PBR); and potato–barley–sorghum sudan grass ([ Sorghum bicolor L.) used as green manure])/winter rape ( Brassica napus subsp. rapifera ) (PBSW); and potato–barley–canola ([ Brassica napus susbsp. napus ] used as green manure)/winter rape (PBCW). Three different N sources (mineral N fertilizer, liquid hog manure, and lobster flake) were applied in a split‐plot fashion during the potato phase. Potatoes were grown in 2006, 2009, 2012, and again in 2013 to evaluate residual effects. In 2012, total N or total C in the whole soil, in particulate organic matter or in the slurry fractions were not affected by N sources or rotation systems. The PBSW and PBCW rotations generated significantly higher potato yields in 2009 and 2013, whereas the CP rotation produced significantly lower potato yields in 2 of 4 yr. The addition of lobster flake suppressed yield compared with other N sources in 3 of 4 yr. The PBR rotation, which is common in PEI can increase nitrate losses over winter. Alternatively, the PBSW and PBCW rotations may represent a good substitute to the PBR rotation as they can increase potato yield while minimizing nitrate losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen sources and rotations did not affect measured soil N and C fractions in 2012.

Treatment
N sources or rotation systemse0
Outcome
total N or total C in the whole soil, in particulate organic matter or in the slurry fractionse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 2012, total N or total C in the whole soil, in particulate organic matter or in the slurry fractions were not affected by N sources or rotation systems.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1088 · show in text ↑
t0

“Improving Productivity of Managed Potato Cropping Systems in Eastern Canada: Crop Rotation and Nitrogen Source Effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PBSW rotation produced significantly higher potato yields in 2009 and 2013.

Treatment
PBSWe0
Outcome
potato yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
2009 and 2013e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PBSW and PBCW rotations generated significantly higher potato yields in 2009 and 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PBCW rotation produced significantly higher potato yields in 2009 and 2013.

Treatment
PBCWe0
Outcome
potato yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
2009 and 2013e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PBSW and PBCW rotations generated significantly higher potato yields in 2009 and 2013”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1089–1178 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous potato produced significantly lower yields in two of four years.

Treatment
CP rotatione0
Outcome
potato yieldse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
2 of 4 yre0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the CP rotation produced significantly lower potato yields in 2 of 4 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1260 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lobster flake suppressed potato yield versus other N sources in three of four years.

Treatment
lobster flakee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
suppressede0
Value
3 of 4 yre0
Comparator
other N sourcese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The addition of lobster flake suppressed yield compared with other N sources in 3 of 4 yr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“Improving Productivity of Managed Potato Cropping Systems in Eastern Canada: Crop Rotation and Nitrogen Source Effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The PBR rotation can increase winter nitrate losses.

Treatment
PBR rotatione0
Outcome
nitrate lossese0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
PEIe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The PBR rotation, which is common in PEI can increase nitrate losses over winter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1433 · show in text ↑
t0

“Improving Productivity of Managed Potato Cropping Systems in Eastern Canada: Crop Rotation and Nitrogen Source Effects”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–118 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose PBSW and PBCW as substitutes for PBR to increase yield and minimize nitrate losses.

Outcome
good substitute to the PBR rotatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the PBSW and PBCW rotations may represent a good substitute to the PBR rotation as they can increase potato yield while minimizing nitrate losses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1449–1595 · show in text ↑

rotation · nutrient: content · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

rotation · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

42 papers: 26 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.