Paper · 2025 · Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment

Exploring cherry tomato quality in response to varied watering regimens and growing structures

Kusumiyati Kusumiyati; Farhan Ahmad; Muhamad Aditia Ghifari; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Cherry tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum ) are a high‐value vegetable worldwide. Tomato quality, which can influence nutritional value, is an essential factor for consumer choice. A research study conducted between December 2022 and May 2023 aimed to optimize the quality of cherry tomato cultivars Ruby and Fortesa. The study examined the effects of various watering capacities and growth structures. The study used a randomized complete design with a post hoc Tukey test and found that the cultivar selection was crucial, with Fortesa outperforming other cultivars regarding yield and quality parameters. Ruby simultaneously performed exceptionally well in characteristics such as fruit glucose content and antioxidant activity. Furthermore, the kind of growing structure had significant consequences; greenhouse and rain shelter designs produced higher output and higher quality tomatoes. Watering capacity continuously increased water‐use efficiency, especially at 50% of the evapotranspiration coefficient (ETc). These results highlight the critical role that cultivar selection, growing structures, and watering capacities play in optimizing cherry tomato yield and quality, and they may have future ramifications for sustainable agriculture and nutrition‐focused projects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Fortesa outperformed other cultivars for yield and quality parameters of cherry tomato.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
Fortesae1
Outcome
yield and quality parameterse1
Direction
outperforminge1
Comparator
other cultivarse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cherry tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
e1

“with Fortesa outperforming other cultivars regarding yield and quality parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–612 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Ruby performed exceptionally well for fruit glucose content and antioxidant activity.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
Rubye2
Outcome
fruit glucose content and antioxidant activitye2
Direction
performed exceptionally welle2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cherry tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
e2

“Ruby simultaneously performed exceptionally well in characteristics such as fruit glucose content and antioxidant activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–736 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse and rain shelter designs produced higher cherry tomato output than other growing structures.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
greenhouse and rain shelter designse3
Outcome
outpute3
Direction
highere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cherry tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
e3

“greenhouse and rain shelter designs produced higher output and higher quality tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greenhouse and rain shelter designs produced higher cherry tomato quality than other growing structures.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
greenhouse and rain shelter designse3
Outcome
qualitye3
Direction
highere3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cherry tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
e3

“greenhouse and rain shelter designs produced higher output and higher quality tomatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Watering capacity continuously increased water-use efficiency of cherry tomato, especially at 50% of ETc.

Taxon
Solanum lycopersicumSolanum lycopersicume0
Treatment
Watering capacitye4
Outcome
water‐use efficiencye4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
especially at 50% of the evapotranspiration coefficient (ETc)e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cherry tomatoes ( Solanum lycopersicum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–49 · show in text ↑
e4

“Watering capacity continuously increased water‐use efficiency, especially at 50% of the evapotranspiration coefficient (ETc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1023 · show in text ↑

rainfall · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

cultivation system · quality: general · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 78 positive, 25 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 117 positive, 30 negative or no effect

116 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.