Paper · 2025 · Agriculture

Circadian-Mediated Regulation of Growth, Chloroplast Proteome, Targeted Metabolomics and Gene Regulatory Network in Spinacia oleracea Under Drought Stress

Ajila Venkat; Sowbiya Muneer

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The paramount objectives of this study were to analyze the beneficial role of the circadian clock in alleviating drought stress in an essential green leafy horticultural crop, spinach (Spinacia oleracea), and to attain knowledge on drought-stress adaptation for crop productivity. From dawn to dusk, a circadian core oscillator-based defense mechanism was noticed in relation to the strength of the chloroplast proteome and transcriptome, and the defense hormone fused it along with the molecular physiology using genotypes “Malav Jyoti” and “Delhi Green”. A photo-periodic rhythmicity containing a 4 h time interval (morning–evening loop) for 12 h in spinach was exhibited under drought-stressed (day-5) and drought re-irrigated (day-10) conditions. The circadian oscillator controlled 70% of the major part of growth and physiological measures such as the biomass, plant height, leaf-relative water content, and the shoot–root ratio under drought stress. Contrarily, drought stress resulted in the upregulation of antioxidative activities and stress markers, whereas it was diversified and maintained in the case of the re-irrigated state at certain rhythmic time intervals of the circadian clock. The physiological parameters we examined, such as net photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance, and antioxidative enzymes, exhibited the role of the circadian clock in drought stress by showing 80–90% improvements found in plants when they were re-watered after drought stress based on their circadian oscillations. Based on the physiological results, 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. were disclosed to be the rhythmic times for controlling drought stress. Moreover, an extensive study on a gene expression analysis of circadian clock-based genes (CCA1, LHY, TOC1, PRR3, PRR5, PRR7, PRR9, and RVE8) and drought-responsive genes (DREB1, DREB2, and PIP1) depicted the necessity of a circadian oscillator in alleviating drought stress. Hence, the findings of our study allowed for an intense understanding of photo-periodic rhythms in terms of the morning–evening loop, which is in line with the survival rate of spinach plants and occurs by altering cellular ROS-scavenging mechanisms, chloroplast protein profiles, gene regulation, and metabolite concentrations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A dawn-to-dusk circadian defense mechanism was observed with chloroplast proteome and transcriptome changes.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceat0
Outcome
circadian core oscillator-based defense mechanisme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“From dawn to dusk, a circadian core oscillator-based defense mechanism was noticed in relation to the strength of the chloroplast proteome and transcriptome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–437 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spinach displayed 4-hour rhythmicity across a 12-hour period in drought and re-irrigation conditions.

Outcome
photo-periodic rhythmicitye0
Value
4 he0
Qualifier
drought-stressed (day-5) and drought re-irrigated (day-10) conditionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A photo-periodic rhythmicity containing a 4 h time interval (morning–evening loop) for 12 h in spinach was exhibited under drought-stressed (day-5) and drought re-irrigated (day-10) conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–750 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The circadian oscillator controlled 70% of growth and physiological measures under drought.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceat0
Outcome
growth and physiological measurese0
Value
70%e0
Qualifier
under drought stresse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The circadian oscillator controlled 70% of the major part of growth and physiological measures such as the biomass, plant height, leaf-relative water content, and the shoot–root ratio under drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought upregulated antioxidative activities and stress markers.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceat0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
antioxidative activities and stress markerse0
Direction
upregulatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drought stress resulted in the upregulation of antioxidative activities and stress markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Re-irrigation maintained and diversified antioxidative activities and stress markers across circadian intervals.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceat0
Treatment
re-irrigated statee0
Outcome
antioxidative activities and stress markerse1
Direction
diversified and maintainede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was diversified and maintained in the case of the re-irrigated state at certain rhythmic time intervals of the circadian clock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1198 · show in text ↑
e1

“antioxidative activities and stress markers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Re-watered plants showed 80–90% improvements in examined physiological parameters.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceat0
Treatment
re-watered after drought stresse0
Outcome
net photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductancee0
Direction
improvementse0
Value
80–90%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net photosynthesis, transpiration, stomatal conductance, and antioxidative enzymes, exhibited the role of the circadian clock in drought stress by showing 80–90% improvements found in plants when they were re-watered after drought stress based on their circadian oscillations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1525 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The study identified 10 a.m. and 2 p.m. as rhythmic times for drought control.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceat0
Outcome
rhythmic times for controlling drought stresse0
Value
10 a.m. and 2 p.m.e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“10 a.m. and 2 p.m. were disclosed to be the rhythmic times for controlling drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1652 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Circadian and drought-responsive gene expression supported a role for the oscillator in drought alleviation.

Taxon
Spinacia oleraceaSpinacia oleraceat0
Gene
CCA1e0
Outcome
necessity of a circadian oscillator in alleviating drought stresse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“gene expression analysis of circadian clock-based genes (CCA1, LHY, TOC1, PRR3, PRR5, PRR7, PRR9, and RVE8) and drought-responsive genes (DREB1, DREB2, and PIP1) depicted the necessity of a circadian oscillator in alleviating drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1688–1928 · show in text ↑
t0

“Spinacia oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 116–133 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.