Paper · 2025 · Plant Science Today

Impact of weed management practices on weed control efficiency and fibre quality in cotton under the high-density planting system

R Nageswari; T Sanjay Kumar; R Anitha; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Cotton enjoyed the synonyms ‘White Gold,’ ‘King of Fibre Crops,’ and ‘Friendly Fibre’, playing a vital role as both a cash and fibre crop in India. However, weeds pose a major challenge, causing an approximate 45% yield reduction in cotton nationwide. Effective weed management is crucial for optimizing cotton yield and fibre quality. This study evaluated the impact of various weed management practices on productivity and fibre quality. Field trials were conducted using multiple treatments, including pre-and post-emergence herbicides, hand weeding, and power weeding. Fibre quality parameters, such as fibre length, strength, fineness, micronaire, and elongation percentage, were measured across treatments. While results showed no significant differences in fibre quality among the treatments, the combination of preemergence (PE) application of Pendimethalin at the rate of 1.0 kg active ingredient ha-1 + Metolachlor at the rate of 1.0 kg active ingredient ha-1 followed by post-emergence (POE) application of Pyrithiobac sodium at the rate of 0.075 kg active ingredient ha-1 + quizalofop ethyl at the rate of 0.075 kg active ingredient ha-1 emerged as the most effective weed control strategy.This treatment provided effective weed suppression, reduced competition for resources, and resulted in a higher seed cotton yield than other treatments. The study concluded that, although fibre quality did not vary significantly, the integrated use of Pendimethalin and Metolachlor as preemergence herbicides and Pyrithiobac sodium and quizalofop ethyl as post-emergence herbicides offers an optimal solution for cotton growers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fibre quality did not differ significantly among treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
fibre qualitye0
Direction
no significant differencese0
Comparator
among the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“results showed no significant differences in fibre quality among the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined pre- and post-emergence herbicide treatment was the most effective weed control strategy.

Treatment
combination of preemergence (PE) application of Pendimethalin at the rate of 1.0 kg active ingredient ha-1 + Metolachlor at the rate of 1.0 kg active ingredient ha-1 followed by post-emergence (POE) application of Pyrithiobac sodium at the rate of 0.075 kg active ingredient ha-1 + quizalofop ethyl at the rate of 0.075 kg active ingredient ha-1e0
Outcome
weed control strategye0
Direction
most effectivee0
Comparator
various weed management practicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the combination of preemergence (PE) application of Pendimethalin at the rate of 1.0 kg active ingredient ha-1 + Metolachlor at the rate of 1.0 kg active ingredient ha-1 followed by post-emergence (POE) application of Pyrithiobac sodium at the rate of 0.075 kg active ingredient ha-1 + quizalofop ethyl at the rate of 0.075 kg active ingredient ha-1 emerged as the most effective weed control strategy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 800–1202 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“various weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 371–404 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated herbicide treatment suppressed weeds.

Treatment
This treatmente0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
weed suppressione0
Direction
effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment provided effective weed suppression, reduced competition for resources, and resulted in a higher seed cotton yield than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“weeds pose a major challenge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated treatment reduced competition for resources.

Treatment
This treatmente0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
competition for resourcese0
Direction
reducede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment provided effective weed suppression, reduced competition for resources, and resulted in a higher seed cotton yield than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–90 · show in text ↑
e1

“weeds pose a major challenge”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–185 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The integrated treatment increased seed cotton yield over other treatments.

Treatment
This treatmente0
Interactor
weedse1weed
Outcome
seed cotton yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This treatment provided effective weed suppression, reduced competition for resources, and resulted in a higher seed cotton yield than other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1202–1354 · show in text ↑
e1

“weeds pose a major challenge, causing an approximate 45% yield reduction in cotton nationwide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 157–250 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the integrated herbicide program for cotton growers.

Outcome
integrated use of Pendimethalin and Metolachlor as preemergence herbicides and Pyrithiobac sodium and quizalofop ethyl as post-emergence herbicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the integrated use of Pendimethalin and Metolachlor as preemergence herbicides and Pyrithiobac sodium and quizalofop ethyl as post-emergence herbicides offers an optimal solution for cotton growers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1630 · show in text ↑

quizalofop-ethyl · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

pendimethalin · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 36 positive, 2 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

metolachlor · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Pyrithiobac-sodium · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results agree

18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

herbicide · weed · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

108 papers: 100 positive, 8 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

104 papers more in this group

See all 108 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.