Paper · 2025 · Agricultural Water Management

Remote sensing-based analysis of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency in winter wheat management

Weiguang Zhai; Qian Cheng; Fuyi Duan; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
27
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Winter wheat is one of the world’s most important food crops, and effective water and fertilizer management is crucial for optimizing its yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency. Unmanned aerial vehicle remote sensing provides a reliable tool for accurately monitoring winter wheat growth and dynamically adjusting water and fertilizer strategies to enhance yield. In this study, a water and fertilizer experiment was conducted in Xinxiang County, Henan Province, a region with a warm temperate continental monsoon climate, characterized by hot, humid summers and cold, dry winters. Various water (W1: 0 mm, W2: 50 mm, W3: 100 mm, W4: 150 mm) and nitrogen (N1: 0 kg/ha, N2: 90 kg/ha, N3: 210 kg/ha, N4: 330 kg/ha) treatments were applied. Subsequently, the effects of different water and fertilizer treatments on winter wheat yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency were evaluated, and the response patterns between winter wheat spectral features (normalized difference vegetation index, NDVI) and texture features (Contrast) and yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency were analyzed. The main findings are: (1) Winter wheat yield increased with higher irrigation and nitrogen levels but plateaued when irrigation reached 120 mm and nitrogen application was 225 kg/ha, beyond which further increases showed no significant improvement; (2) Water-fertilizer use efficiency decreased with increasing irrigation and nitrogen levels but improved with synergistic water-fertilizer interactions. The N3W3 treatment achieved high yield while maintaining superior water-fertilizer use efficiency (irrigation water use efficiency: 1.28 kg/m³, agronomic nitrogen efficiency: 13.33 kg/kg, and fertilizer benefit: 5961.30 RMB/ha), making it the most effective management strategy; (3) NDVI exhibited saturation under high-density conditions, limiting its sensitivity to subtle differences in winter wheat. Conversely, Contrast provided complementary insights into canopy structure, revealing variations in uniformity and resource efficiency under excessive water and nitrogen inputs. Integrating NDVI with Contrast enabled a more accurate assessment of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency, offering actionable insights for optimizing water-fertilizer management strategies. • Yield increased with irrigation and nitrogen but plateaued beyond 100 mm/210 kg/hm 2 . • Contrast can reveals canopy structure variations under excessive resource inputs. • Integrating NDVI and Contrast can assess water-fertilizer management. • Remote sensing potential for rapidly monitoring water-fertilizer use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat yield increased with higher irrigation and nitrogen levels.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation and nitrogen levelse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Remote sensing-based analysis of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency in winter wheat management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Winter wheat yield increased with higher irrigation and nitrogen levels but plateaued when irrigation reached 120 mm and nitrogen application was 225 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat yield plateaued when irrigation reached 120 mm and nitrogen was 225 kg/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation reached 120 mme1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
plateauede1
Value
120 mme1
Qualifier
nitrogen application was 225 kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Remote sensing-based analysis of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency in winter wheat management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Winter wheat yield increased with higher irrigation and nitrogen levels but plateaued when irrigation reached 120 mm and nitrogen application was 225 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1273 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-fertilizer use efficiency decreased with increasing irrigation and nitrogen levels.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increasing irrigation and nitrogen levelse2
Outcome
Water-fertilizer use efficiencye2
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Remote sensing-based analysis of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency in winter wheat management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Water-fertilizer use efficiency decreased with increasing irrigation and nitrogen levels but improved with synergistic water-fertilizer interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-fertilizer use efficiency improved with synergistic water-fertilizer interactions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
synergistic water-fertilizer interactionse2
Outcome
Water-fertilizer use efficiencye2
Direction
improvede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Remote sensing-based analysis of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency in winter wheat management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“Water-fertilizer use efficiency decreased with increasing irrigation and nitrogen levels but improved with synergistic water-fertilizer interactions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N3W3 treatment had irrigation water use efficiency of 1.28 kg/m³ with superior water-fertilizer use efficiency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N3W3e3
Outcome
irrigation water use efficiencye3
Direction
superiore3
Value
1.28 kg/m³e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Remote sensing-based analysis of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency in winter wheat management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“The N3W3 treatment achieved high yield while maintaining superior water-fertilizer use efficiency (irrigation water use efficiency: 1.28 kg/m³, agronomic nitrogen efficiency: 13.33 kg/kg, and fertilizer benefit: 5961.30 RMB/ha), making it the most effective management strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N3W3 treatment had agronomic nitrogen efficiency of 13.33 kg/kg.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N3W3e3
Outcome
agronomic nitrogen efficiencye3
Direction
superiore3
Value
13.33 kg/kge3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Remote sensing-based analysis of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency in winter wheat management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“The N3W3 treatment achieved high yield while maintaining superior water-fertilizer use efficiency (irrigation water use efficiency: 1.28 kg/m³, agronomic nitrogen efficiency: 13.33 kg/kg, and fertilizer benefit: 5961.30 RMB/ha), making it the most effective management strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N3W3 treatment had fertilizer benefit of 5961.30 RMB/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N3W3e3
Outcome
fertilizer benefite3
Direction
superiore3
Value
5961.30 RMB/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Remote sensing-based analysis of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency in winter wheat management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“The N3W3 treatment achieved high yield while maintaining superior water-fertilizer use efficiency (irrigation water use efficiency: 1.28 kg/m³, agronomic nitrogen efficiency: 13.33 kg/kg, and fertilizer benefit: 5961.30 RMB/ha), making it the most effective management strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The N3W3 treatment achieved high yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N3W3e3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
highe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Remote sensing-based analysis of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency in winter wheat management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“The N3W3 treatment achieved high yield while maintaining superior water-fertilizer use efficiency (irrigation water use efficiency: 1.28 kg/m³, agronomic nitrogen efficiency: 13.33 kg/kg, and fertilizer benefit: 5961.30 RMB/ha), making it the most effective management strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1772 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend N3W3 as the most effective water and fertilizer management strategy.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
N3W3e3
Outcome
most effective management strategye3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Remote sensing-based analysis of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency in winter wheat management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e3

“The N3W3 treatment achieved high yield while maintaining superior water-fertilizer use efficiency (irrigation water use efficiency: 1.28 kg/m³, agronomic nitrogen efficiency: 13.33 kg/kg, and fertilizer benefit: 5961.30 RMB/ha), making it the most effective management strategy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1772 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NDVI saturates under high-density conditions, limiting its sensitivity to subtle differences in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high-density conditionse4
Outcome
saturatione4
Qualifier
limiting its sensitivity to subtle differencese4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Remote sensing-based analysis of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency in winter wheat management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“NDVI exhibited saturation under high-density conditions, limiting its sensitivity to subtle differences in winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1897 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Contrast reveals variations in canopy uniformity under excessive water and nitrogen inputs.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
excessive water and nitrogen inputse5
Outcome
variations in uniformitye5
Qualifier
canopy structuree5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Remote sensing-based analysis of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency in winter wheat management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e5

“Conversely, Contrast provided complementary insights into canopy structure, revealing variations in uniformity and resource efficiency under excessive water and nitrogen inputs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1899–2075 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrating NDVI with Contrast gives a more accurate assessment of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Integrating NDVI with Contraste6
Outcome
assessment of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiencye6
Direction
more accuratee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Remote sensing-based analysis of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency in winter wheat management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“Integrating NDVI with Contrast enabled a more accurate assessment of yield and water-fertilizer use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2077–2187 · show in text ↑

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.