Abstract
Intensive rotational grazing is a recently proposed rangeland management strategy that has been praised by the public and media but has not been fully proven or widely accepted by rangeland ecologists . In this study, a three-year experiment was performed to evaluate the effects of intensive rotational grazing on the rangeland ecosystem in a typical steppe in Inner Mongolia, China. The experiment involved three treatments of rotational management with the same level of grazing intensity (1 sheep unit per ha in the first year and 1.3 sheep unit per ha for the next two years), including intensive rotational grazing (livestock rotated every 3–5 days), traditional rotational grazing (livestock rotated every 15 days), and continuous grazing (without livestock rotation). In addition, this experiment set up “no grazing treatment” as the reference and represents the widely used policy of “grazing forbidden”. Compared with previous studies, this study first implemented rotational grazing at a low level of grazing intensity to obey the rangeland policy of Chinese governments, which aimed to balance the forage demand of livestock and the ecosystem conservation. The results revealed that the aboveground biomass and root biomass (0–10 cm deep) were significantly higher in the intensive rotational grazing treatment than in the other two grazing treatments. Moreover, the biomass of the dominant species ( Leymus chinensis ) and its proportion in the community were also higher in the intensive grazing treatment. Intensive rotational grazing could also promote the weight gain of grazing sheep. However, intensive rotational grazing did not improve the carbon sequestration of rangeland. These results indicated that intensive rotational grazing had considerable advantages in realizing the sustainable management of grazing grasslands when grazing intensity was at a relatively low level, which aims to balance plant growth and livestock production of grasslands. Furthermore, our results suggest that intensive rotational grazing is beneficial for promoting the progressive succession of degraded grasslands and providing economic revenue for local herders, thus worth studying in more regions and rangeland scenarios.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Intensive rotational grazing increased aboveground biomass over the other grazing treatments.
Verbatim
e0“The results revealed that the aboveground biomass and root biomass (0–10 cm deep) were significantly higher in the intensive rotational grazing treatment than in the other two grazing treatments.”
t0“rangeland”
Claim · model-written summary
Intensive rotational grazing increased root biomass at 0–10 cm over the other grazing treatments.
Verbatim
e0“The results revealed that the aboveground biomass and root biomass (0–10 cm deep) were significantly higher in the intensive rotational grazing treatment than in the other two grazing treatments.”
t0“rangeland”
Claim · model-written summary
Intensive grazing increased biomass of Leymus chinensis.
- Taxon
- Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensise0
- Treatment
- intensive grazing treatmente0
- Outcome
- biomasse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Moreover, the biomass of the dominant species ( Leymus chinensis ) and its proportion in the community were also higher in the intensive grazing treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intensive grazing increased the community proportion of Leymus chinensis.
- Taxon
- Leymus chinensisLeymus chinensise0
- Treatment
- intensive grazing treatmente0
- Outcome
- proportion in the communitye0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Moreover, the biomass of the dominant species ( Leymus chinensis ) and its proportion in the community were also higher in the intensive grazing treatment.”
Claim · model-written summary
Intensive rotational grazing did not improve rangeland carbon sequestration.
- Taxon
- rangelande0
- Treatment
- intensive rotational grazinge0
- Outcome
- carbon sequestratione0
- Direction
- did not improvee0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“However, intensive rotational grazing did not improve the carbon sequestration of rangeland.”
The same questions in other papers
grazing · growth · Leymus chinensisPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.