Paper · 2024 · Interdepartmental Thematic Scientific Collection of Phytosanitary safety

Efficiency of systems of biological protection of potatoes against diseases

M. Solomiychuk; M. Pikovskyi

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Goal. To investigate the application of various potato protection schemes based on biological preparations and to determine their effectiveness against the most harmful diseases. Methods. Laboratory (pathogen identification, disease diagnosis) and field (vegetation indicators analysis) research methods. The study of the effectiveness of biological preparations was carried out on the basis of the Ukrainian Research Plant Quarantine Station of the Institute of Plant Protection against a natural infectious background. During the growing season, three foliar treatments with drugs were carried out. Results. The use of biological preparations of a fungicidal and stimulating nature contributed to the growth of yield and improvement of the marketability of potatoes. The highest yield was formed by treatment with the preparation BioHybervit BT and amounted to 21.3 t/ha. The best protection of potatoes against diseases was obtained with the use of Bactophyt BT, where the effectiveness against Alternaria was 66.8%, and against late blight — 89.8%. Stimulating drugs provided an immunoprotective effect of 65—70% against phytophthora and 40—47% against Alternaria. The best indicators of tuber formation and productivity were noted in scheme 4, which included the use of the following drugs: Vitastim BT, Trihopsyn BT, Gliocladin BT, Biospectr BT, Bactophyt BT and chelates 1 and 2, where the weight of tubers per plant was 693 g/plant. Conclusions. The use of a number of biological preparations during the growing season contributed to the control of the main potato diseases and the preservation of the crop. Biological drugs and growth stimulants that showed the highest efficiency were used for the development of potato protection schemes. The use of a system of biopreparations, which included 4 consecutive treatments with combinations of the stimulating nature drug Vitastim BT with BT fungicides and chelated microelements, provided the best protection. Against phytophthora this indicator was 78.4% and 78.9% against Alternaria.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological preparations of a fungicidal and stimulating nature contributed to the growth of potato yield.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
biological preparations of a fungicidal and stimulating naturee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
growthe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of systems of biological protection of potatoes against diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of biological preparations of a fungicidal and stimulating nature contributed to the growth of yield and improvement of the marketability of potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biological preparations of a fungicidal and stimulating nature improved the marketability of potatoes.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
biological preparations of a fungicidal and stimulating naturee1
Outcome
marketabilitye1
Direction
improvemente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of systems of biological protection of potatoes against diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of biological preparations of a fungicidal and stimulating nature contributed to the growth of yield and improvement of the marketability of potatoes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The BioHybervit BT treatment gave the highest potato yield, 21.3 t/ha.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
BioHybervit BTe2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
21.3 t/hae2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of systems of biological protection of potatoes against diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest yield was formed by treatment with the preparation BioHybervit BT and amounted to 21.3 t/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bactophyt BT gave the best protection of potatoes, with 66.8% effectiveness against Alternaria.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
Bactophyt BTe3
Interactor
AlternariaAlternariae3pathogen
Outcome
effectiveness against Alternariae3
Direction
beste3
Value
66.8%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria
Alternaria · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)http://phil.cdc.gov/phil_images/20030612/9/PHIL_3963_lores.jpg · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of systems of biological protection of potatoes against diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e3

“The best protection of potatoes against diseases was obtained with the use of Bactophyt BT, where the effectiveness against Alternaria was 66.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1018 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bactophyt BT gave the best protection of potatoes, with 89.8% effectiveness against late blight.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
Bactophyt BTe3
Interactor
late blighte4pathogen
Outcome
effectivenesse3
Direction
beste3
Value
89.8%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of systems of biological protection of potatoes against diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e3

“The best protection of potatoes against diseases was obtained with the use of Bactophyt BT, where the effectiveness against Alternaria was 66.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1018 · show in text ↑
e4

“and against late blight — 89.8%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stimulating drugs gave an immunoprotective effect of 65—70% against Phytophthora.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
Stimulating drugse2
Interactor
phytophthoraPhytophthorae2pathogen
Outcome
immunoprotective effecte2
Direction
providede2
Value
65—70%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of systems of biological protection of potatoes against diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e2

“Stimulating drugs provided an immunoprotective effect of 65—70% against phytophthora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stimulating drugs gave an immunoprotective effect of 40—47% against Alternaria.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
Stimulating drugse5
Interactor
AlternariaAlternariae5pathogen
Outcome
immunoprotective effecte5
Direction
providede5
Value
40—47%e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria
Alternaria · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)http://phil.cdc.gov/phil_images/20030612/9/PHIL_3963_lores.jpg · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of systems of biological protection of potatoes against diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e5

“Stimulating drugs provided an immunoprotective effect of 65—70% against phytophthora and 40—47% against Alternaria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Scheme 4 gave the best tuber formation and productivity among the potato protection schemes.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
scheme 4e6
Outcome
tuber formation and productivitye6
Direction
beste6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of systems of biological protection of potatoes against diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“The best indicators of tuber formation and productivity were noted in scheme 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1247 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In scheme 4 the weight of tubers per potato plant was 693 g/plant.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
scheme 4e6
Outcome
weight of tubers per plante7
Value
693 g/plante7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of systems of biological protection of potatoes against diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e6

“The best indicators of tuber formation and productivity were noted in scheme 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1169–1247 · show in text ↑
e7

“where the weight of tubers per plant was 693 g/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1387–1439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A number of biological preparations used during the growing season contributed to the control of the main potato diseases.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
a number of biological preparations during the growing seasone1
Outcome
control of the main potato diseasese1
Direction
contributed toe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of systems of biological protection of potatoes against diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of a number of biological preparations during the growing season contributed to the control of the main potato diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The system of four consecutive biopreparation treatments with Vitastim BT, BT fungicides and chelated microelements gave the best protection.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
4 consecutive treatments with combinations of the stimulating nature drug Vitastim BT with BT fungicides and chelated microelementse1
Outcome
protectione1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of systems of biological protection of potatoes against diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of a system of biopreparations, which included 4 consecutive treatments with combinations of the stimulating nature drug Vitastim BT with BT fungicides and chelated microelements, provided the best protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1966 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the best biopreparation system, the protection indicator against Phytophthora was 78.4%.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
4 consecutive treatments with combinations of the stimulating nature drug Vitastim BT with BT fungicides and chelated microelementse1
Interactor
phytophthoraPhytophthorae2pathogen
Outcome
indicatore2
Value
78.4%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phytophthora
Phytophthora · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Rasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of systems of biological protection of potatoes against diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of a system of biopreparations, which included 4 consecutive treatments with combinations of the stimulating nature drug Vitastim BT with BT fungicides and chelated microelements, provided the best protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1966 · show in text ↑
e2

“Against phytophthora this indicator was 78.4% and 78.9% against Alternaria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1968–2042 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the best biopreparation system, the protection indicator against Alternaria was 78.9%.

Taxon
potatoesSolanum tuberosumt0
Treatment
4 consecutive treatments with combinations of the stimulating nature drug Vitastim BT with BT fungicides and chelated microelementse1
Interactor
AlternariaAlternariae2pathogen
Outcome
indicatore2
Value
78.9%e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Alternaria
Alternaria · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)http://phil.cdc.gov/phil_images/20030612/9/PHIL_3963_lores.jpg · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Efficiency of systems of biological protection of potatoes against diseases”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–75 · show in text ↑
e1

“The use of a system of biopreparations, which included 4 consecutive treatments with combinations of the stimulating nature drug Vitastim BT with BT fungicides and chelated microelements, provided the best protection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1966 · show in text ↑
e2

“Against phytophthora this indicator was 78.4% and 78.9% against Alternaria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1968–2042 · show in text ↑

fungicide · quality: postharvest · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

transgenic · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fungicide · control · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 16 positive, 7 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

fungicide · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 61 positive, 4 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

transgenic · control · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.