Abstract
Goal. To study the possibility of using biological preparations of ITI Biotechnca sowing of nightshade crops and to determine their effectiveness against harmful organisms. Methods. Laboratory (identification of pathogens) and field (analysis of vegetation indicators) research methods. The study of the effectiveness of biological preparations was carried out on the basis of the Ukrainian Research Plant Quarantine Station of the Institute of Plant Protection against a natural infectious background. During the growing season, three foliar treatments with drugs were carried out. Results. The research results showed that the use of ITI Biotechnik insecticides provided a better effect on larvae of the Colorado potato beetle of 1—2 ages. The effectiveness of drugs against the Colorado beetle for the drug Bitoxybacillin BT was 71.5%, for Actofit BT — 49.5%, Boverin BT — 80.4%, Metarizin BT — 65.2%. The use of insecticides of biological origin contributed to an increase in vegetation indicators, as well as an increase in the yield of potatoes compared to the control. The use of drugs of a fungicidal and stimulating nature contributed to the growth of yield and higher marketability of potatoes. The highest yield was formed in the Podolyanka variety when treated with BioGibervit BT and was 21.3 t/ha. The best protection against potato diseases was obtained with the use of Bactophyt BT, where the effectiveness against Alternaria was 66.8%, and against late blight — 89.8%. Stimulating drugs provided an immunoprotective effect of 65—70% against phytophthora and 40—47% against Alternaria. Conclusions. The use of a number of individual biopreparations produced by ITI Biotechnika during the growing season makes it possible to control pests, reduce the damage to plants by diseases, and increase the yield of potatoes. Biological drugs and growth stimulants that have shown the best effectiveness can be recommended for the formation of a potato protection system based on BT drugs.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 13
Claim · model-written summary
ITI Biotechnik insecticides acted better on Colorado potato beetle larvae of ages 1–2.
- Treatment
- ITI Biotechnik insecticidese0
- Interactor
- Colorado potato beetle
Leptinotarsa decemlineatae0pest - Outcome
- effect on larvae of the Colorado potato beetlee0
- Direction
- bettere0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the use of ITI Biotechnik insecticides provided a better effect on larvae of the Colorado potato beetle of 1—2 ages.”
Claim · model-written summary
Bitoxybacillin BT effectiveness against Colorado beetle was 71.5%.
- Treatment
- Bitoxybacillin BTe0
- Interactor
- Colorado beetlee0pest
- Outcome
- effectiveness of drugs against the Colorado beetlee0
- Value
- 71.5%e0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The effectiveness of drugs against the Colorado beetle for the drug Bitoxybacillin BT was 71.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Actofit BT effectiveness against Colorado beetle was 49.5%.
Not reportedTaxonOutcome
Verbatim
e0“for Actofit BT — 49.5%”
Claim · model-written summary
Boverin BT effectiveness against Colorado beetle was 80.4%.
Not reportedTaxonOutcome
Verbatim
e0“Boverin BT — 80.4%”
Claim · model-written summary
Metarizin BT effectiveness against Colorado beetle was 65.2%.
Not reportedTaxonOutcome
Verbatim
e0“Metarizin BT — 65.2%.”
Claim · model-written summary
Biological insecticides increased potato vegetation indicators and yield against controls.
- Taxon
- potatoes
Solanum tuberosume0 - Treatment
- insecticides of biological origine0
- Outcome
- vegetation indicatorse0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- the controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The use of insecticides of biological origin contributed to an increase in vegetation indicators, as well as an increase in the yield of potatoes compared to the control.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fungicidal and stimulating drugs increased potato yield and marketability.
- Taxon
- potatoesSolanum tuberosume0
- Treatment
- drugs of a fungicidal and stimulating naturee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- growthe0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The use of drugs of a fungicidal and stimulating nature contributed to the growth of yield and higher marketability of potatoes.”
Claim · model-written summary
Podolyanka treated with BioGibervit BT produced the highest yield, 21.3 t/ha.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield was formed in the Podolyanka variety when treated with BioGibervit BT and was 21.3 t/ha.”
Claim · model-written summary
Bactophyt BT protection effectiveness against Alternaria was 66.8%.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Treatment
- Bactophyt BTe0
- Interactor
- Alternaria
Alternariae0pathogen - Outcome
- effectiveness against Alternariae0
- Value
- 66.8%e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best protection against potato diseases was obtained with the use of Bactophyt BT, where the effectiveness against Alternaria was 66.8%”
Claim · model-written summary
Bactophyt BT protection effectiveness against late blight was 89.8%.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“and against late blight — 89.8%.”
Claim · model-written summary
Stimulating drugs gave 65—70% immunoprotection against phytophthora.
- Treatment
- Stimulating drugse0
- Interactor
- phytophthora
Phytophthorae0pathogen - Outcome
- immunoprotective effecte0
- Value
- 65—70%e0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Stimulating drugs provided an immunoprotective effect of 65—70% against phytophthora”
Claim · model-written summary
Stimulating drugs gave 40—47% immunoprotection against Alternaria.
- Interactor
- AlternariaAlternariae0pathogen
- Outcome
- against Alternariae0
- Value
- 40—47%e0
Not reportedTaxon
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“40—47% against Alternaria.”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend the most effective biological drugs and growth stimulants for a BT-based potato protection system.
- Taxon
- potatoSolanum tuberosume0
- Outcome
- potato protection system based on BT drugse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Biological drugs and growth stimulants that have shown the best effectiveness can be recommended for the formation of a potato protection system based on BT drugs.”
The same questions in other papers
insecticide · Leptinotarsa decemlineata · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →fungicide · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results
60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.