Paper · 2025 · Horticulturae

Efficient Micropropagation by Ex Vitro Rooting of Myrtus communis L.

Raimondo Pardi; Giuseppe Natale Basile; Giuseppe De Mastro; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This survey aims to develop a successful protocol through in vitro multiplication and ex vitro rooting of a native shrub, i.e., Myrtus communis L., in order to obtain the rapid production of large number of healthy plants. The in vitro proliferation showed how the two different genotypes (MR and MB) produced higher values in terms of shoot lengths, mean multiplication index (MMI) and number of nodes when treated with 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) compared to the thidiazuron (TDZ) + 1-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) combination. Concerning in vitro rooting, the experiment resulted in a high rooting rate (75%) and an average number of roots (5.13) by quickly dipping the basal portions in an indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) concentration of 3300 mg L−1, followed by transfer to a hormone-free growth medium (BM). In comparison, the other two concentrations tested (0.3 and 0.6 mg L−1) resulted in higher root length values. During the acclimatization phase, the study showed how the different treatments affected the development of the test shoots differently. In particular, shoots of both genotypes pre-treated by quickly dipping them in Clonex® to induce ex vitro rooting showed abundant root production only 10 days after the treatment compared to the in vitro rooting, in which roots were formed after 30 days. This suggests that ex vitro pre-treatment with Clonex® not only accelerates the rooting process compared to in vitro treatment, resulting in lower costs and easier processing, but also significantly increases root density, contributing to improved transplant success and plantlets quality. These results support the thesis that ex vitro rooting optimises plant propagation protocols, offering economic and practical advantages for nurseries and other propagation systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BAP increased shoot length, multiplication index and nodes in both genotypes relative to TDZ+NAA.

Taxon
Myrtus communis L.Myrtus communist0
Treatment
6-benzylaminopurine (BAP)e0
Outcome
shoot lengths, mean multiplication index (MMI) and number of nodese0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
thidiazuron (TDZ) + 1-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) combinatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myrtus communis
Myrtus communis · TaxonGeorge E. Koronaios · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the two different genotypes (MR and MB) produced higher values in terms of shoot lengths, mean multiplication index (MMI) and number of nodes when treated with 6-benzylaminopurine (BAP) compared to the thidiazuron (TDZ) + 1-naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–526 · show in text ↑
t0

“Myrtus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA dip at 3300 mg L−1 yielded 75% rooting.

Taxon
Myrtus communis L.Myrtus communist0
Treatment
indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) concentration of 3300 mg L−1e0
Outcome
rooting ratee0
Direction
highe0
Value
75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myrtus communis
Myrtus communis · TaxonGeorge E. Koronaios · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high rooting rate (75%) and an average number of roots (5.13) by quickly dipping the basal portions in an indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) concentration of 3300 mg L−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“Myrtus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

IBA dip at 3300 mg L−1 yielded 5.13 roots on average.

Taxon
Myrtus communis L.Myrtus communist0
Treatment
indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) concentration of 3300 mg L−1e0
Outcome
average number of rootse0
Value
5.13e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myrtus communis
Myrtus communis · TaxonGeorge E. Koronaios · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high rooting rate (75%) and an average number of roots (5.13) by quickly dipping the basal portions in an indole-3-butyric acid (IBA) concentration of 3300 mg L−1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“Myrtus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two lower IBA concentrations produced longer roots.

Taxon
Myrtus communis L.Myrtus communist0
Treatment
0.3 and 0.6 mg L−1e0
Outcome
root length valuese0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myrtus communis
Myrtus communis · TaxonGeorge E. Koronaios · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the other two concentrations tested (0.3 and 0.6 mg L−1) resulted in higher root length values”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 824–918 · show in text ↑
t0

“Myrtus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clonex pretreatment produced abundant roots by day 10 versus day 30 for in vitro rooting.

Taxon
Myrtus communis L.Myrtus communist0
Treatment
Clonex®e0
Outcome
root productione0
Direction
abundante0
Value
10 dayse0
Qualifier
30 dayse0
Comparator
in vitro rootinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myrtus communis
Myrtus communis · TaxonGeorge E. Koronaios · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shoots of both genotypes pre-treated by quickly dipping them in Clonex® to induce ex vitro rooting showed abundant root production only 10 days after the treatment compared to the in vitro rooting, in which roots were formed after 30 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1072–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“Myrtus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–68 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors concluded ex vitro Clonex pretreatment accelerates rooting and increases root density.

Taxon
Myrtus communis L.Myrtus communist0
Treatment
Clonex®e0
Outcome
root densitye0
Direction
increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Myrtus communis
Myrtus communis · TaxonGeorge E. Koronaios · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ex vitro pre-treatment with Clonex® not only accelerates the rooting process compared to in vitro treatment, resulting in lower costs and easier processing, but also significantly increases root density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1533 · show in text ↑
t0

“Myrtus communis L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–68 · show in text ↑

N-benzyladenine · pest · Myrtus communisResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

indole-3-butyric acid · growth · Myrtus communisResults agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.