Paper · 2025 · Egyptian Journal of Soil Science

Biochar as a Potential Strategy for Enhancing Wheat Production in Arid Soils under deficit irrigation practices

Ibrahim Mohamed; Ahmed A Abdelhafez; Yasmine Ihab Mohamed Farid; et al.

14
claims
33
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Deficit irrigations, combined with biochar, could be an effective solution to aleviate drought stress in wheat; thereby enhancing its productivity in arid soils. To test this hypothesis, a greenhouse experiment of a randomized complete block design was conducted, comprising two factors: (1) two levels of deficit irrigations at 60 and 80% of soil field capacity (designated as FC60 and FC80, respectively) and (2) three biochar doses, i.e. 0, 5 and 10 g kg-1 (refered to as B0, B5 and B10, respectively). Plants grown on a soil irrigated at 100% of the field capacity without biochar application served as a reference control treatment. This brought the total number of treatments to seven. Results obtained in this study revealed that root biomass increased significantly with deficit irrigation; yet wheat shoots and grains decreased considerably. On the other hand, the application of biochar, generally enhanced shoot and grain yields while decreasing root growth. This in turn augmented both shoo-to-root and grain-to-shoot ratios. In this regard, the highest increase in grain yield was observed for B5+FC100, while the highest increase in shoot –to-root ratio was recorded for the B10+FC100 treatment. Biochar upgraded the coping strategies of wheat plants under drought stress by increasing the osmoregulator proline in shoots, Mn content in roots and Cu concentrations in different plant parts, especially at the highest application rate (B10). These two nutrients (Mn and Cu) are incorporated into detoxifying enzymes that neutralize superoxide radicals which accumulate under abiotic stress. Nevertheless, the high dose of biochar likely immobilized soil nutrients and reduced their concentrations in different plant parts. Overall, residual organic matter increased in biochar-amended soil, and its consequences on soil pH were not significant. This could guarantee sustainable crop production in such soils. In conclusion, the combination of deficit irrigation and biochar application can be used successfully to increase wheat production in arid soils, while optimizing irrigation water use and sustaining soil productivity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation significantly increased root biomass of wheat in a greenhouse experiment.

Treatment
deficit irrigatione3
Outcome
root biomasse3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
soil irrigated at 100% of the field capacity without biochar applicatione2
Setting
greenhousee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“To test this hypothesis, a greenhouse experiment of a randomized complete block design was conducted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–262 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants grown on a soil irrigated at 100% of the field capacity without biochar application served as a reference control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–636 · show in text ↑
e3

“root biomass increased significantly with deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deficit irrigation decreased shoot and grain yields of wheat considerably.

Treatment
deficit irrigatione3
Outcome
shoots and grainse4
Direction
decreasede4
Comparator
soil irrigated at 100% of the field capacity without biochar applicatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–62 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants grown on a soil irrigated at 100% of the field capacity without biochar application served as a reference control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–636 · show in text ↑
e3

“root biomass increased significantly with deficit irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 737–797 · show in text ↑
e4

“wheat shoots and grains decreased considerably”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–849 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application generally increased shoot and grain yields of wheat.

Treatment
the application of biochare5
Outcome
shoot and grain yieldse5
Direction
enhancede5
Qualifier
generallye5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–62 · show in text ↑
e5

“the application of biochar, generally enhanced shoot and grain yields while decreasing root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar application decreased root growth of wheat.

Treatment
the application of biochare5
Outcome
root growthe5
Direction
decreasinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–62 · show in text ↑
e5

“the application of biochar, generally enhanced shoot and grain yields while decreasing root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–968 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar augmented the shoot-to-root and grain-to-shoot ratios of wheat.

Treatment
the application of biochare5
Outcome
shoo-to-root and grain-to-shoot ratiose6
Direction
augmentede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–62 · show in text ↑
e5

“the application of biochar, generally enhanced shoot and grain yields while decreasing root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 870–968 · show in text ↑
e6

“This in turn augmented both shoo-to-root and grain-to-shoot ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield increase in wheat was observed for B5+FC100.

Treatment
B5+FC100e7
Outcome
grain yielde7
Direction
highest increasee7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–62 · show in text ↑
e7

“the highest increase in grain yield was observed for B5+FC100”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest shoot-to-root ratio increase in wheat was recorded for B10+FC100.

Treatment
B10+FC100 treatmente0
Outcome
shoot –to-root ratioe0
Direction
highest increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–62 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest increase in shoot –to-root ratio was recorded for the B10+FC100 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1208 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased osmoregulator proline in shoots of wheat under drought stress.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
shootse1
Treatment
Biochare1
Outcome
osmoregulator proline in shootse1
Direction
increasinge1
Qualifier
under drought stresse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biochar upgraded the coping strategies of wheat plants under drought stress by increasing the osmoregulator proline in shoots, Mn content in roots and Cu concentrations in different plant parts, especially at the highest application rate (B10)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1453 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar increased Mn content in roots and Cu concentrations in different plant parts of wheat, especially at the highest rate.

Taxon
wheat plantsTriticum aestivume1
Organ / stage
rootse1
Treatment
Biochare1
Outcome
Mn content in roots and Cu concentrations in different plant partse1
Direction
increasinge1
Qualifier
especially at the highest application rate (B10)e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–62 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biochar upgraded the coping strategies of wheat plants under drought stress by increasing the osmoregulator proline in shoots, Mn content in roots and Cu concentrations in different plant parts, especially at the highest application rate (B10)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1210–1453 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Mn and Cu are incorporated into detoxifying enzymes that neutralize superoxide radicals accumulating under abiotic stress in wheat.

Compound
Mn and Cue2
Outcome
neutralize superoxide radicalse2
Qualifier
incorporated into detoxifying enzymese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–62 · show in text ↑
e2

“These two nutrients (Mn and Cu) are incorporated into detoxifying enzymes that neutralize superoxide radicals which accumulate under abiotic stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1455–1602 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A high dose of biochar reduced nutrient concentrations in different plant parts of wheat.

Treatment
high dose of biochare3
Outcome
concentrations in different plant partse3
Direction
reducede3
Qualifier
likely immobilized soil nutrientse3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–62 · show in text ↑
e3

“the high dose of biochar likely immobilized soil nutrients and reduced their concentrations in different plant parts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1618–1734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar amendment increased residual organic matter in soil.

Treatment
biochar-amended soile4
Outcome
residual organic mattere4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–62 · show in text ↑
e4

“Overall, residual organic matter increased in biochar-amended soil, and its consequences on soil pH were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1856 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar amendment had no significant effect on soil pH.

Treatment
biochar-amended soile4
Outcome
soil pHe4
Direction
not significante4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–62 · show in text ↑
e4

“Overall, residual organic matter increased in biochar-amended soil, and its consequences on soil pH were not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1736–1856 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Combining deficit irrigation with biochar application can be used to increase wheat production in arid soils while optimizing irrigation water use.

Treatment
the combination of deficit irrigation and biochar applicatione5
Outcome
wheat productione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Enhancing Wheat Production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–62 · show in text ↑
e5

“In conclusion, the combination of deficit irrigation and biochar application can be used successfully to increase wheat production in arid soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1922–2066 · show in text ↑

biochar · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

biochar · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

23 papers: 21 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 59 positive, 4 negative or no effect

58 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

biochar · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 111 positive, 10 negative or no effect

110 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.